Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:12:29.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicides for Killing Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea) Infected With Fescue Endophyte (Acremonium coenophialum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Albert E. Smith
Albert E. Smith*
Affiliation:
Univ. Ga., Griffin, GA 30223
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The importance of tall fescue as a pasture grass is diminished when infected with the fescue endophyte. The availability of fungus-free seed has necessitated the development of systems to kill the infected sod before interseeding fungus-free seed. Field studies were conducted to evaluate the response of fescue sod to foliar-applied herbicides as single and sequential applications during the fall and spring. Sequential applications of paraquat at 0.14, 0.28, and 0.56 kg ai/ha in September and October and glyphosate at 0.84 and 1.7 kg/ha applied as single or sequential applications in September and October resulted in more than 90% kill of the tall fescue sod. Spring treatments of paraquat and glyphosate were less effective than those applied in the fall. Dalapon, fluazifop-P, HOE-39866 [glufosinate (proposed name)], sethoxydim, and simazine did not effectively kill the sod.

Keywords

Dalapon, 2,2-dichloropropanoic acidfluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidglufosinate, ammonium-DL-homoalanin-4-yl(methyl)phosphinateglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineparaquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ionsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onesimazine, 6-chloro-N,N′-diethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminetall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb. ♯3 FESARfescue endophyte, Acremonium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and GamsAcremonium coenophialumendophytepasture renovationherbicide system
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 485 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bacon, C. W., Porter, J. K., Robbins, J. D., and Luttrell, E. S. 1977. Epichloe typhina from toxic tall fescue grasses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35:576–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hoveland, C. S., Haaland, R. L., King, C. C. Jr., Anthony, W. B., Clark, E. M., McGuire, J. A., Smith, L. A., Grimes, H. W., and Holliman, J. L. 1980. Association of Epichloe typhina fungus and steer performance on tall fescue pasture. Agron. J. 72:1064–1065.Google Scholar
3. Little, T. M., and Hills, F. J. 1978. Agricultural Experimentation. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Neill, J. C. 1941. The endophytes of Lolium and Festuca . N.A.J. Sci. Technol. 23A:185–195.Google Scholar
5. Pedersen, J. F., McGuire, J. A., Schmidt, S. P., King, C. C. Jr., Hoveland, C. S., and Smith, L. A. 1986. Steer performance as affected by tall fescue cultivar and level of Acremonium coenophialum . N.Z.J. Exp. Agric. 14:307–312.Google Scholar
6. Sampson, K. 1933. The systemic infection of grasses by Epichloe typhina (Pers.) Tul. Trans. Br. Myco. Soc. 18:30–47.Google Scholar
7. Stuedemann, J. A., and Hoveland, C. S. 1988. Fescue endophyte: History and impact on animal agriculture. J. Prod. Agric. 1:39–44.Google Scholar
8. Stuedemann, J. A., Wilkinson, S. R., Belesky, D. P., Hoveland, C. S., Devine, O. J., Thompson, F. N., McCampbell, H. C., Townsend, W. E., and Ciordia, H. 1986. Effect of level of fungus and nitrogen fertilization rate of KY-31 tall fescue on steer performance. J. Anim. Sci. 63 (Suppl. 1): 290–291.Google Scholar
9. Williams, M. J., Backman, P. A., Crawford, M. A., Schmidt, S. P., and King, C. C. Jr. 1984. Chemical control of the tall fescue endophyte and its relationship to cattle performance. N.Z.J. Exp. Agric. 12:165–171.Google Scholar