Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:38:48.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in the Canadian Prairies: 2007 to 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hugh J. Beckie ,
Chris Lozinski ,
Scott Shirriff  and
Clark. A. Brenzil
Hugh J. Beckie*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0X2, Canada
Chris Lozinski
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0X2, Canada
Scott Shirriff
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0X2, Canada
Clark. A. Brenzil
Affiliation:
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, 125-3085 Albert Street, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0B1, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A late-summer survey of herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds was conducted in Alberta in 2007, Manitoba in 2008, and Saskatchewan in 2009, totaling 1,000 randomly selected annually cropped fields. In addition, we screened 1,091 weed seed samples (each sample from one field) submitted by Prairie growers between 2007 and 2011. Of 677 fields where wild oat samples were collected, 298 (44%) had an HR biotype. Group 1 (acetyl CoA carboxylase inhibitor)-HR wild oat was confirmed in 275 fields (41%), up from 15% in previous baseline surveys (2001 to 2003). Group 2 (acetolactate synthase)-HR wild oat was found in 12% of fields (vs. 8% in 2001 to 2003). Group 8 (triallate, difenzoquat)-HR wild oat was identified in only 8% of fields (not tested in 2001 to 2003); the frequency of occurrence of group 1+2-HR wild oat was similar (8%, vs. 3% in 2001 to 2003). Group 1-HR green foxtail was found in 27% of 209 fields sampled for the weed (vs. 6% in 2001 to 2003). Group 2-HR spiny sowthistle was confirmed in all Alberta fields sampled (vs. 67% in 2001); common chickweed was found mainly in Alberta in 40% of fields (vs. 17% in 2001). Group 2-HR weed biotypes not previously detected in the baseline surveys included false cleavers mainly in Alberta (17% of fields) and Saskatchewan (21%), Powell amaranth in Manitoba (16% of fields), wild mustard (three populations in Saskatchewan and Manitoba), and wild buckwheat (one population in Alberta). No sampled weed populations across the Prairies were found to be resistant to herbicides from group 4 (synthetic auxins), group 9 (glyphosate), or group 10 (glufosinate). Based on the proportion of total field area at each site infested with HR weeds, it is estimated that 7.7 million ha (29% of annually cropped land) are infested with HR weeds (eight-fold increase from 2001 to 2003), in a total field area of 9.9 million ha (37%)—over a two-fold increase. Of 816 cases of HR wild oat identified from submitted samples, 69% were group 1-HR, 15% group 2-HR, and 16% group 1+2-HR. Additionally, there were 10 populations of group 1-HR green foxtail in Saskatchewan or Manitoba, and six populations of group 1-HR Persian darnel in southern Alberta and Saskatchewan. Various group 2-HR broadleaf weeds were identified, including 17 wild mustard populations mainly from Saskatchewan and 39 cleavers populations across the three Prairie provinces. Herbicide-use data from 2006 to 2010 indicated continued reliance on group 1 herbicides in cereal crops and group 2 herbicides in pulse crops.

Un estudio observacional sobre malezas resistentes a herbicidas (HR) se realizó al final del verano en Alberta en 2007, Manitoba en 2008 y Saskatchewan en 2009, para un total de 1,000 muestras aleatoriamente seleccionadas de campos cultivados anualmente. Adicionalmente, evaluamos 1,091 muestras de semillas de malezas (cada muestra proveniente de un campo) remitidas por productores de las Praderas entre 2007 y 2011. De 677 campos donde se colectó muestras de Avena fatua, 298 (44%) tuvieron un biotipo HR. Se confirmó Avena fatua HR grupo 1(inhibidores de acetyl CoA carboxylase) en 275 campos (41%), lo cual fue un incremento del 15% con base en estudios de referencia previos (2001–2003). Se encontró A. fatua HR grupo 2 (acetolactate synthase) en 12% de los campos (vs. 8% en 2001 a 2003). A. fatua HR grupo 8 (triallate, difenzoquat) fue identificada en solamente 8% de los campos (no se evaluó en 2001 a 2003). La frecuencia de presencia de A. fatua HR grupos 1+2 fue similar (8%, vs. 3% en 2001 a 2003). Setaria viridis HR grupo 1 fue encontrada en 27% de 209 campos muestreados por esta maleza (vs. 6% en 2001 al 2003). Se confirmó Sonchus asper HR grupo 2 en todos los campos muestreados en Alberta (vs. 67% en 2001); mientras que Stellaria media HR se encontró principalmente en Alberta en 40% de los campos (vs. 17% en 2001). Biotipos de malezas HR grupo 2 que no habían sido detectados en los estudios previos incluyeron Galium spurium principalmente en Alberta (17% de los campos) y en Saskatchewan (21%), Amaranthus powellii en Manitoba (16% de los campos), Sinapis arvensis (tres poblaciones en Saskatchewan y Manitoba) y Polygonum convolvulus (una población en Alberta). De las poblaciones de malezas muestreadas a lo largo de las Praderas, no se encontró ninguna que fuera resistentes a herbicidas del grupo 4(auxinas sintéticas), grupo 9 (glyphosate) o grupo 10 (glufosinate). Basándose en la proporción del área total de campos infestados con malezas HR en cada sitio, se estimó que 7.7 millones ha (29% de la tierra cultivada anualmente) están infestadas con malezas HR (un incremento de ocho veces desde 2001 a 2003), en un área total de 9.9 millones ha (37%)—más del doble de incremento. De 816 casos de A. fatua HR identificados en las muestras remitidas, 69% fueron HR grupo 1, 15% HR grupo 2 y 16% HR grupo 1+2. Adicionalmente, hubo 10 poblaciones de S. viridis HR grupo 1 en Saskatchewan o Manitoba, y seis poblaciones de Lolium persicum HR grupo 1 en el sur de Alberta y Saskatchewan. Varias malezas de hoja ancha HR grupo 2 fueron identificadas, incluyendo 17 poblaciones de S. arvensis predominantemente de Saskatchewan y 39 poblaciones de G. spurium a lo largo de tres provincias de las Praderas. Datos de uso de herbicidas de 2006 a 2010 indicaron que ha continuado la dependencia en herbicidas grupo 1 en cultivos de cereales y de herbicidas grupo 2 en cultivos de granos de especies dicotiledóneas.

Keywords

Common chickweed, Stellaria media (L.) Vill. STEMEfalse cleavers, Galium spurium L. GALSPgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. SETVIPersian darnel, Lolium persicum Boiss. & Hohen. ex Boiss. LOLPSPowell amaranth, Amaranthus powellii S. Wats. AMAPOspiny sowthistle, Sonchus asper (L.) Hill SONASwild buckwheat, Polygonum convolvulus L. POLCOwild mustard, Sinapis arvensis L. SINARwild oat, Avena fatua L. AVEFAACCase inhibitorALS inhibitorherbicide resistanceresistance managementsurvey
Type
Education/Extension
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 171 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 2003. A National Ecological Framework for Canada: GIS Data. http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/ecostrat/gis_data.html. Accessed: February, 2012.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Harker, K. N., Hall, L. M., Holm, F. A., and Gulden, R. H. 2011a. Risk assessment of glyphosate resistance in western Canada. Weed Technol. 25 :159–164.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Heap, I. M., Smeda, R. J., and Hall, L. M. 2000. Screening for herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Technol. 14 :428–445.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Brenzil, C. A., Hall, L. M., Holzgang, G., Lozinski, C., and Shirriff, S. 2008. Weed resistance monitoring in the Canadian Prairies. Weed Technol. 22 :530–543.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., and Légère, A. 1999a. Nature, occurrence, and cost of herbicide-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis) across Saskatchewan ecoregions. Weed Technol. 13 :626–631.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., Légère, A., Kelner, D. J., Van Acker, R. C., and Meers, S. 1999b. Nature, occurrence, and cost of herbicide-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) in small-grain production areas. Weed Technol. 13 :612–625.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., and Sauder, C. A. 2012a. Basis for herbicide resistance in Canadian populations of wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 60 :10–18.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., and Sauder, C. A. 2012b. Acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor-resistant wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus) in Alberta. Weed Technol. 26 :151–155.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., Sauder, C. A., Kelln, G. M., and Lozinski, C. 2012c. Acetolactate synthase inhibitor-resistant false cleavers (Galium spurium) in western Canada. Weed Technol. 26 :151–155.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., Sauder, C. A., Lozinski, C., and Shirriff, S. 2011b. Occurrence and molecular characterization of acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia) in western Canada. Weed Technol. 25 :170–175.Google Scholar
Broster, J. C., Koetz, E. A., and Wu, H. 2011. Herbicide resistance in wild oats (Avena spp.) in southern New South Wales. Plant Prot. Q. 26 :106–107.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2012. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: September 2012.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Hall, L. M., Brenzil, C. A., Andrews, T., Brown, K. R., and Van Acker, R. C. 2005. Prairie weed surveys of cereal, oilseed and pulse crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Weed Survey Series Publ. 05–1. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada : Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 395 p.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Sharma, M. P., Harker, K. N., Maurice, D., Baig, M. N., and Blackshaw, R. E. 1994. Wild oat (Avena fatua) populations resistant to triallate are also resistant to difenzoquat. Weed Sci. 42 :195–199.Google Scholar
Owen, M. J. and Powles, S. B. 2009. Distribution and frequency of herbicide-resistant wild oat (Avena spp.) across the Western Australian grain belt. Crop Pasture Sci. 60 :25–31.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2006. November estimate of production of principal field crops, Canada, 2006. Field Crop Reporting Series, Vol. 85, No. 8. Catalogue No. 22-002-XIB, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 31 p.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2007a. Area of Commercial Fertilizer, Herbicides, Insecticides and Fungicides Applied by Province. Census of Agriculture 2006. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/agrc05i-eng.htm. Accessed: June, 2012.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2007b. November estimate of production of principal field crops, Canada, 2007. Field Crop Reporting Series, Vol.86, No.8. Catalogue No. 22-002-XIE. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada : 30 p.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2008. November estimate of production of principal field crops, Canada, 2008. Field Crop Reporting Series, Vol. 87, No. 8. Catalogue No. 22-002-XIE, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 31 p.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2009. November estimate of production of principal field crops, Canada, 2009. Field Crop Reporting Series, Vol.88, No.8. Catalogue No. 22-002-XIE, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada : 71 p.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2011. November estimate of production of principal field crops, Canada, 2011. Field Crop Reporting Series, Vol. 90, No. 8. Catalogue No. 22-002-XIE, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 46 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Sci. 33 :34–43.Google Scholar
Travlos, I. S., Giannopolitis, C. N., and Economou, G. 2011. Diclofop resistance in sterile wild oat (Avena sterilis L.) in wheat fields in Greece and its management by other post-emergence herbicides. Crop Prot. 30 :1449–1454.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I., Sauder, C. A., and Beckie, H. J. 2010. Acetolactate synthase (ALS) target-site mutations in ALS inhibitor-resistant Russian thistle (Salsola tragus). Weed Sci. 58 :244–251.Google Scholar