Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:18:08.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicide Seed Treatments for Control of Purple Witchweed (Striga hermonthica) in Sorghum and Millet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bouréma Dembélé
Affiliation:
Institut d'Economie Rurale, Avenue Mohamed 5, BP 258 Bamako, Mali
Daouda Dembélé
Affiliation:
Institut d'Economie Rurale, Avenue Mohamed 5, BP 258 Bamako, Mali
James H. Westwood*
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Blacksburg, VA 24061
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A promising approach for the control of parasitic weeds is herbicide seed priming, which consists of soaking crop seeds in a herbicide solution such that the herbicide is later present in the crop seedling to inhibit growth of attaching parasites. This technique is effective where selectivity exists between crop and parasite; for example, varieties of imidazolinone-resistant maize. However, seed priming has not been reported for sorghum or pearl millet, two crops that are greatly affected by purple witchweed. Research was initiated to evaluate herbicides for potential use as seed priming agents in these crops. Auxin-mimic and acetolactate synthase-inhibitor class herbicides were evaluated; specifically, clopyralid, 2,4-DB, dicamba, picloram, and prosulfuron. For sorghum, immersion of seed in 0.5% (w/v) ae 2,4-DB for 5 min 1 d before planting reduced purple witchweed densities to levels 20 to 50% of nontreated controls. However, this concentration was at the threshold of crop toxicity and reduced sorghum yields in some experiments. None of the herbicides tested consistently reduced purple witchweed on pearl millet. This research illustrates both the potential and limitations of adapting seed priming technology for sorghum and pearl millet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aviv, D., Amsellem, Z., and Gressel, J. 2002. Transformation of carrots with mutant acetolactate synthase for Orobanche (broomrape) control. Pest Manage. Sci. 58:11871193.Google Scholar
Berner, D. K., Awad, A. E., and Aigbokhan, E. I. 1994. Potential of imazaquin seed treatment for control of Striga gesnerioides and Alectra vogelii in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Plant Dis. 78:1823.Google Scholar
Berner, D., Ikie, F. O., and Green, J. M. 1997. ALS-inhibiting herbicide seed treatments control Striga hermonthica in ALS-modified corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11:704707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsky, R. J., Singh, L., and Ndikawa, R. 1994. Effect of herbicide and handweeding on current and subsequent season Striga hermonthica density on sorghum. Int. J. Pest Manage. 40:111116.Google Scholar
Díaz-Sánchez, J., Jurado-Exósito, M., López-Granados, F., Castejón-Muñoz, M., and García-Torres, L. 2003. Pronamide applied to sunflower seeds for Orobanche cumana control. Weed Technol. 17:314319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Sánchez, J., López-Martínez, N., López-Granados, F., De Prado, R., and García-Torres, L. 2002. Absorption, translocation, and fate of herbicides in Orobanche cumana–sunflower system. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 74:915.Google Scholar
Foy, C. L., Jain, R., and Jacobsohn, R. 1989. Recent approaches for chemical control of broomrape (Orobanche spp). Rev. Weed Sci. 4:123152.Google Scholar
Gworgwor, N. A., Hudu, A. I., and Joshua, S. D. 2002. Seed treatment of sorghum varieties with brine (NaCl) solution for control of Striga hermonthica in sorghum. Crop Prot. 21:10151021.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, G., Marnotte, P., and Dembél&eacute, D. 1997. Emploi d'herbicides pour lutter contre le Striga hermonthica . Revue Agric. Dev. 13:5862.Google Scholar
Jurado-Expósito, M., Castejón-muñoz, M., and García-Torres, L. 1996. Broomrape (Orobanche crenata) control with imazethapyr applied to pea (Pisum sativum) seed. Weed Technol. 10:774780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurado-Expósito, M., Castejón-muñoz, M., and García-Torres, L. 1999. Uptake and translocation of imazethapyr in peas as affected by parasitism of Orobanche crenata and herbicide application methods. Weed Res. 39:129136.Google Scholar
Jurado-Expósito, M., García-Torres, L., and Castejón-muñoz, M. 1997. Broad bean and lentil seed treatments with imidazolinones for the control of broomrape (Orobanche crenata). J. Agric. Sci. 129:307314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanampiu, F., Ransom, J., Gressel, J., Jewell, D., Friesen, D., Grimanelli, D., and Hoisington, D. 2002a. Appropriateness of biotechnology to African agriculture: Striga and maize as paradigms. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 69:105110.Google Scholar
Kanampiu, F. K., Ransom, J. K., Friesen, D., and Gressel, J. 2002b. Imazapyr and pyrithiobac movement in soil and from maize seed coats to control Striga in legume intercropping. Crop Prot. 21:611619.Google Scholar
Kanampiu, F. K., Ransom, J. K., and Gressel, J. 2001. Imazapyr seed dressings for Striga control on acetolactate synthase target-site resistant maize. Crop Prot. 20:885895.Google Scholar
Kim, S. K., Adetimirin, V. O., Th&eacute, C., and Dossou, R. 2002. Yield losses in maize due to Striga hermonthica in West and Central Africa. Int. J. Pest Manage. 48:211217.Google Scholar
Oerke, E-C., Dehne, H-W., Schonbeck, F., and Weber, A. 1994. Crop Production and Crop Protection. Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pp. 372387.Google Scholar
Paré, J., Dembélé, B., Ouédraogo, O., Raynal-Roques, A., Tuquet, C., and Sallé, G. 1997. Dynamics of flowering and embryology of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. (Scrophulariaceae): implications for chemical control). Int. J. Pest Manage. 43:285290.Google Scholar