Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:11:29.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicidal Control of Velvet Lupine (Lupinus leucophyllus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael H. Ralphs
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Sery., U.S. Dep. Agric., Poisonous Plant Res. Lab., 1150 E. 1400 N., Logan, UT 84321
M. Coburn Williams
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Sery., U.S. Dep. Agric., Poisonous Plant Res. Lab., 1150 E. 1400 N., Logan, UT 84321
David L. Turner
Affiliation:
Dep. Appl. Stat., Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322

Abstract

Several herbicides were evaluated for the control of velvet lupine (Lupinus leucophyllus Dougl. #3 LUPLE), a plant poisonous to sheep on western mountain ranges, and a secondary target species, mountain big sagebrush [Artemisia tridentata Nutt. # ARTTR]. Change in foliar cover of the two target species and associated vegetation was used to evaluate efficacy of the herbicides. Velvet lupine cover was reduced by greater than 50% in the 1983 trial by the butyl ester of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] at 2.2 and 4.5 kg ae/ha, the butoxyethanol ester of 2,4,5-T [(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ae/ha, the dimethylamine salt of dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) at 2.2 kg ae/ha, and 2,4-D plus dicamba at 1.1 plus 0.6 kg/ha. Cover of velvet lupine and other forbs was reduced by drought in the spring of 1985 and obscured the comparison among herbicides in the 1984 trial. Cover of mountain big sagebrush was consistently reduced (>88%) by 2,4-D at 4.5 kg/ha in both trials, and by three rates of the butoxyethyl ester of triclopyr {[(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acid} (>67%) in the 1984 trial. Grass cover increased in plots where herbicides effectively reduced velvet lupine, forbs, and mountain big sagebrush.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bohmont, D. W. 1952. Chemical control of poisonous range plants. Wyo. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 313. p. 69.Google Scholar
2. Couch, J. F. 1926. Relative toxicity of the lupine alkaloids. J. Agric. Res. 32:5167.Google Scholar
3. Davis, A. L. 1982. The occurrence of anagyrine in a collection of western America lupines. J. Range Manage. 35:8184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Keeler, R. F. 1973, Lupin alkaloids from teratogenic and nonteratogenic lupins. II. Identification of the major alkaloids by tandem gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in plants producing crooked calf disease. Teratology 7:3136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Keeler, R. F., James, L. F., Shupe, J. L., and Van Kampen, K. R. 1977. Lupin-induced crooked calf disease and a management method to reduce incidence. J. Range Manage. 30:97102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kingsburg, J. M. 1964. Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. p. 333337.Google Scholar
7. Marsh, H. 1965. Newsoms Sheep Diseases. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, p. 343345.Google Scholar
8. Mueggler, W. F. 1952. Effects of several chemicals on tall larkspur and associated tailcup lupine. USDA/FS Res. Note INT 4.Google Scholar
9. NAS/NRC. 1962. Basic problems and techniques in range research. National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council Pub. No. 890. Washington, DC. p. 4765.Google Scholar
10. Parker, K. G. 1959. Lupine. In. Chemical Control of Range Weeds. USDA/USDI Range Seeding Equipment Committee. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC. p. F15.Google Scholar
11. Shupe, J. L., Binns, W., James, L. F., and Keeler, R. F. 1967. Lupine, a case of crooked calf disease. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 151:198203.Google Scholar
12. Welsh, S. L. 1978. Utah flora: Fabaceae (Leguminosae). Great Basin Nat. 38:225307.Google Scholar