Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:09:45.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hemp Dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Selective Postemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Corey V. Ransom  and
James J. Kells
Corey V. Ransom
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
James J. Kells*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
*
Corresponding author's E-mail address: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1994 to 1996 in Michigan to evaluate postemergence (POST) herbicides for hemp dogbane control in corn. Studies were initiated at no-tillage and chisel-plowed sites each of the three years. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron were evaluated alone and in combination with 2,4-D amine or dicamba. In 1995 and 1996, CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron was also applied alone and in combination with 2,4-D or dicamba. Control varied among years and sites. Nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, and CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron applied alone controlled 30% of the hemp dogbane, and dicamba or 2,4-D alone controlled 42 and 66%, respectively. Tank mixtures of nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, or CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron with dicamba were more effective and more consistent than dicamba alone. Combinations of nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, or CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron with 2,4-D gave the most effective and consistent control across sites, with an average of 93% control. In general, treatments controlled only shoots that had emerged at the time of application. New shoots emerged following herbicide application at the chisel-tillage sites in 1994 and 1995 but not at the no-tillage sites. However, in 1996, shoot emergence following treatment occurred in both no-tillage and chisel-tillage sites.

Keywords

Dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidnicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamideprimisulfuron, 2-[[[[[4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidCGA-152005 (proposed common name, prosulfuron), 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[2-(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-phenylsulfonyl]-urea2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidhemp dogbane, Apocynum cannabinum L. # APPCAcorn, Zea mays L., # ZEAMXPerennial weedtillageAPPCAZEAMXGDD, growing degree daysNIS, nonionic surfactantPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 631 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address of senior author: Malheur Experiment Station. Oregon State University, 595 Onion Avenue, Ontario, OR 97914

References

Literature Cited

Balbach, H. E. 1965. Variation and Speciation in Populations of Apocynaceae in North America. . University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL. p. 1.Google Scholar
Barnes, D. and Brenchley, R. 1972. Response of hemp dogbane to the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate (MON-2139). Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 27:54–55.Google Scholar
Becker, R. 1981. Today's weed: hemp dogbane. Weeds Today. 12:15–16.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. B., Stoltenberg, D. E., Becker, R. L., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1994. Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Sci. 42:205–209.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., Evetts, L. L., and Mumm, R. F. 1981. Germination of exhumed weed seed in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 29:577–586.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Wilson, R. G., Weisberg, S., and Hubbard, K. G. 1996. Seed longevity of 41 weed species buried 17 years in eastern and western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 44:74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, J. D. 1997. Hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum L.) management in corn and glyphosate-resistant soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:90.Google Scholar
Evetts, L. C. and Burnside, O. C. 1973. Watch out for hemp dogbane. Nebr. Farm Ranch Home Q. 19:19–20.Google Scholar
Glenn, S. and Anderson, N. G. 1993. Hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) and wild blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis) control in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:47–51.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Berry, M. A. 1991. Use of a grower survey for estimating weed problems. Weed Technol. 5:460–466.Google Scholar
Orfanedes, M. S. and Wax, L. M. 1991. Differential response of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to clopyralid, Dowco 433, and 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 5:782–788.Google Scholar
Ransom, C. V., Kells, J. J., Wax, L. M., and Orfanedes, M. S. 1998. Morphological variation among hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) populations. Weed Sci. 46:71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, L. R. and Jeffery, L. S. 1972. Hemp dogbane growth and control. Weed Sci. 20:156–159.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979a. Control of hemp dogbane with foliar and soil applied herbicides. Agron. J. 71:723–729.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979b. Distribution, competition, and phenology of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 27:565–570.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1985. Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production. In Weise, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America Monogr. 2. pp. 26–40.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr., and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453–457.Google Scholar
Woodson, R. E. Jr. 1930. Studies in the Apocynaceae 1. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 17:1–212.Google Scholar