Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:06:38.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Greenhouse Assessment of Differences in Clomazone Tolerance among Sweetpotato Cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

H. F. Harrison Jr.  and
D. M. Jackson
H. F. Harrison Jr.*
Affiliation:
U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2700 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414
D. M. Jackson
Affiliation:
U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2700 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differences in clomazone tolerance among sweetpotato cultivars were first observed in April 2007 after use of the herbicide for weed control in fields containing the sweetpotato breeding project at the U.S. Vegetable Laboratory. Susceptible cultivars and experimental clones exhibited severe foliar chlorosis and reduced growth, whereas the most tolerant were not injured. Twelve cultivars and experimental clones were included in a greenhouse experiment to quantify the differences in clomazone tolerance. In the greenhouse, the clomazone concentration that caused moderate injury or reduction in shoot growth to the most tolerant clones was approximately 10 times the concentration that caused a similar response in the most susceptible clones. Two older cultivars, Excel and Sumor, that were developed before the registration of clomazone for use in sweetpotato were susceptible. Clomazone is an important component in sweetpotato weed management, and susceptibility is an undesirable trait that should be avoided in new sweetpotato cultivars.

Las diferencias de la tolerancia al clomazone entre los cultivares de camote se observaron por primera vez en abril de 2007, después del uso del herbicida para el control de malezas en campos donde se realizó el proyecto de mejoramiento del camote en el U.S. Vegetable Laboratory. Los cultivares susceptibles y clones experimentales mostraron clorosis foliar severa y crecimiento reducido, mientras que los más tolerantes no se dañaron. Doce cultivares y clones experimentales se incluyeron en un ensayo de invernadero para cuantificar las diferencias en la tolerancia al clomazone. En el invernadero, la concentración de clomazone que causó un daño moderado o reducción en el crecimiento de los brotes en los clones más tolerantes, fue aproximadamente 10 veces la concentración que causó una respuesta similar en los clones más susceptibles. Resultaron susceptibles dos de los cultivares más antiguos, Excel y Sumor, que fueron desarrollados antes del registro de clomazone para usar en el camote. Clomazone es un componente importante en el manejo de malezas en el cultivo de camote y su susceptibilidad es un rasgo no deseable que debe evitarse en los nuevos cultivares de camote.

Keywords

Clomazonesweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) LamHerbicide toleranceinjurysusceptibility
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 501 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, . 2005. Command 3ME herbicide product label. EPA Reg. No. 279-3158. Philadelphia FMC Corp. 19 p.Google Scholar
CoStat version 6.4. 1998. CoHort Software. Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010. FAO Statistics. http://faostat.org. Accessed Dec 16, 2010.Google Scholar
Harrison, H. F. Jr. and Keinath, A. P. 2003. Glasshouse assessment of clomazone response in US pumpkin cultivars. Crop Prot. 22:795–798.Google Scholar
Hopen, H. J., Hughes, R. L., and Michaelis, B. A. 1992. Selectivity among cabbage cultivars to clomazone. Weed Technol. 7:471–477.Google Scholar
Jones, A. 1986. Sweet potato heritability estimates and their use in breeding. Hortscience 21:14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keifer, D. W. 1989. Tolerance of corn (Zea mays) lines to clomazone. Weed Sci. 37:622–628.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. T., Shankle, M. W., and Miller, D. K. 2006. Efficacy and tolerance of flumioxazin on sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol. 20:334–339.Google Scholar
Mudge, C. R., Webster, E. P., Leon, C. T., and Zhang, W. 2005. Rice (Oryza sativa) cultivar tolerance to clomazone in water seeded production. Weed Technol. 19:907–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North Carolina Sweetpotato Commission. 2010. Home Page. http://www.ncsweetpotatoes.com. Accessed December 16, 2010.Google Scholar
Porter, W. C. 1990. Clomazone for weed control in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Weed Technol. 4:648–651.Google Scholar
Scherder, E. F., Talbert, R. E., and Clark, S. D. 2004. Rice (Oryza sativa) cultivar tolerance to clomazone. Weed Technol. 18:140–144.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. K., ed. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 224–226.Google Scholar
Sikkema, P. H., Shropshire, C., and Soltani, N. 2006. Effect of clomazone on various market classes of dry beans. Crop Prot. 26:943–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. Crop Profile for Sweetpotatoes in Mississippi. Office of Pest Management Policy and Pesticide Impact Assessment. http://www.ipmcenters.org/cropprofiles/docs/mssweetpotatoes.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2010.Google Scholar
USDA. 2001a. Crop Profile for Sweetpotatoes in Louisiana. Office of Pest Management Policy and Pesticide Impact Assessment. http://www.ipmcenters.org/cropprofiles/docs/lasweetpotatoes.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2010.Google Scholar
USDA. 2001b. Crop Profile for Sweetpotatoes in Virginia. Office of Pest Management Policy and Pesticide Impact Assessment. http://www.ipmcenters.org/CropProfiles/docs/VAsweetpotato.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2010.Google Scholar
USDA. 2003. Crop Profile for Sweetpotatoes in Texas. Office of Pest Management Policy and Pesticide Impact Assessment. http://www.ipmcenters.org/cropprofiles/docs/txsweetpotatoes.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2010.Google Scholar
USDA. 2005a. Crop Profile for sweetpotatoes in North Carolina. Office of Pest Management Policy and Pesticide Impact Assessment. http://www.ipmcenters.org/cropprofiles/docs/ncsweetpotatoes.pdf. Accessed Dec. 14, 2010.Google Scholar
USDA. 2005b. Crop Profile for Sweetpotatoes in New Jersey. Office of Pest Management Policy and Pesticide Impact Assessment. http://www.ipmcenters.org/cropprofiles/docs/njsweetpotatoes.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2010.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., Blouin, D. C., and Linscombe, S. D. 2004. Differential tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties to clomazone. Weed Technol. 18:73–77.Google Scholar