Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:14:05.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Reduced Rates of Glyphosate and Chlorimuron in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

P. Roy Vidrine ,
James L. Griffin  and
David C. Blouin
P. Roy Vidrine*
Affiliation:
Dean Lee Research Station, 8105 Tom Bowman, Alexandria, LA 71302
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, 302 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, 161 Agricultural Administration, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70894
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted over 2 yr in Louisiana to evaluate entireleaf morningglory and hemp sesbania control by glyphosate isopropylamine salt applied alone at 420, 560, and 700 g ae/ha and in combination with chlorimuron at 4, 6, 9, and 11 g ai/ha. Comparison treatments included glyphosate alone at 840 g/ha, glyphosate at 1,400 g/ha plus chlorimuron at 13 g/ha, and sethoxydim at 210 g ai/ha plus chlorimuron at 11 g/ha. Entireleaf morningglory and hemp sesbania were controlled no more than 77% with glyphosate rates as high as 840 g/ha. Chlorimuron added to glyphosate increased entireleaf morningglory control in two of the three experiments to 83 to 88% and hemp sesbania control to 86 to 98%. Response to chlorimuron was not rate dependent. In most cases, glyphosate–chlorimuron mixtures did not antagonize barnyardgrass control, and increasing rate of glyphosate did not always increase control. Soybean was injured no more than 6% by chlorimuron at one location, but injury was as great as 30% at another location, which was possibly due to smaller soybean size. Differences in weed control and soybean injury among the glyphosate and glyphosate–chlorimuron combinations were not reflected in soybean yields. Because injury occurred early season, sufficient time remained for soybean to recover and produce acceptable yields. Weed control by sethoxydim plus chlorimuron was less consistent than that by glyphosate plus chlorimuron, and soybean yield in most cases was inferior to the glyphosate treatments.

Keywords

Chlorimuron; glyphosate; sethoxydim; barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #3 ECHCG; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; hemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex. A. W. Hill # SEBEX; soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrHerbicide mixturestransgenic soybeanWATweek after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 731 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ambach, R. M. and Ashford, R. 1982. Effects of variation in drop makeup on phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 30: 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ateh, C. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 394–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, F. L. 1995. Weed control in Roundup tolerant soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 46.Google Scholar
Delannay, X., Bauman, T. T., and Beighley, D. H. et al. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35: 1461–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stages of soybean development for soybean (Glycine max L.) Merril. Crop Sci. 11: 929–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimenez, A. E., York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Batts, R. B. 1998. Annual grass control by glyphosate plus bentazon, chlorimuron, fomesafen, or imazethapyr mixtures. Weed Technol. 12: 134–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. E. 1994. Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol. 8: 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Application rate and timing of acifluorfen, bentazon, chlorimuron, and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6: 526–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanie, A. J., Griffin, J. L., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1994. Weed control with non-selective herbicides in soybean (Glycine max) stale seedbed culture. Weed Technol. 8: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45: 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. L., Shaw, D. S., and Snipes, C. E. 2001. Weed control from herbicide combinations with three formulations of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15: 552–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 2000. Weed control programs in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 14: 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retzinger, E. J, Jr and Mallory-Smith, C. 1997. Classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 11: 384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selleck, G. W. and Baird, D. D. 1981. Antagonism of glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 29: 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46: 652–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1994. Reduced rates of Roundup (glyphosate) or Ignite (glufosinate) for postemergence weed control. Abstr. Ark. Agric. Pestic. Assoc. 33: 11.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., and Majek, B. A. 2000. Optimum glyphosate timing with or without residual herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) under full-season conventional tillage. Weed Technol. 14: 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidrine, P. R. and Caylor, J. P. 1999. Weed Control Research Results for 1999. Los Angeles Agricultural Experiment Station Research Summary No. 119:157–161.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Blouin, D. C. 1995. Grass control in soybean (Glycine max) with graminicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 9: 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with lactofen plus chlorimuron. Weed Technol. 7: 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. S., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33: 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar