Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:04:10.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Glufosinate on Rice (Oryza sativa) Transformed with the BAR Gene and Red Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Sujatha Sankula
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, 302 Life Sciences Building, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Michael P. Braverman
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, 302 Life Sciences Building, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Farman Jodari
Affiliation:
Rice Research Station, Crowley, LA 70527
Steven D. Linscombe
Affiliation:
Rice Research Station, Crowley, LA 70527
James H. Oard
Affiliation:
Rice Research Station, Crowley, LA 70527

Abstract

Glufosinate at 1.1 and 2.2 kg/ha injured ‘Koshihikari’ rice lines that were transformed with the BAR gene from 0 to 53%. However, transgenic ‘Gulfmont’ rice was not injured. Rice yields of transgenic ‘Gulfmont’ lines and six of nine ‘Koshihikari’ lines were not affected by 2.2 kg/ha glufosinate. In field studies, flooding reduced the efficacy of glufosinate in controlling red rice, and greenhouse tests determined that glufosinate efficacy was reduced when red rice was submerged between 25 and 50% of its height. Plant heights and dry weights of red rice increased as flood water depth increased at all rates of glufosinate.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agracetus, Inc. 1991. Institutional Biosafety Reports. Construction and Use of Dominant Selectable Markers for Use in Transformation of Plant Cells. Updated Appendum. Middleton, WI. pp. 19.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1987. Rice Production Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, p. 28.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1995. Louisiana's Suggested Weed Control Guide for 1995. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service. pp. 3940.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., 1989. Hoe 39866 use in chemical fallow systems. Weed Technol. 3:420428.Google Scholar
Christou, P., Ford, T. L., and Kofron, M. 1991. Production of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants from agronomically important indica and japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Biotechnology 9:957962.Google Scholar
Copeland, E. B., 1924. Rice. London: McMillan. p. 352.Google Scholar
Craigmiles, J. P., 1978. Introduction. In Eastin, E. F., ed. Red Rice: Research and Control. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experimental Station. pp. 56.Google Scholar
D'Halluin, K., Bossut, M., Bonne, E., Mazur, B., Leemans, J., and Botterman, J. 1992a. Transformation of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) and evaluation of herbicide resistance of transgenic plants. Biotechnology 10:309314.Google Scholar
D'Halluin, K., De Block, M., Janssens, J., Leemans, J., Reynaerts, A., and Botterman, J. 1992b. The BAR gene as a selectable marker in plant engineering. Methods Enzymol. 216:415441.Google Scholar
Diarra, A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1985. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:644649.Google Scholar
Dodson, W. R., 1900. Rice weeds in Louisiana. Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 61:402433.Google Scholar
Droge, W., Broer, I., and Puhler, A. 1992. Transgenic plants containing the phosphinothricin-N-acetyl transferase gene metabolize the herbicide L-phosphinothricin (glufosinate) differently from untransformed plants. Planta 18:142151.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O., and Lydon, J. 1987. Herbicides from natural compounds. Weed Technol. 1:122127.Google Scholar
Kishore, G. M., and Shah, D. M. 1988. Amino acid biosynthesis inhibitors as herbicides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57:627.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. L., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1991. Red rice (Oryza sativa) control and suppression in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 5:811816.Google Scholar
Leemans, J., De Block, M., D'Halluin, K., Botterman, J., and De Greef, W. 1987. The use of glufosinate as a selective herbicide on genetically engineered resistant tobacco plants. Proc. Br. Crop. Prot. Conf. Weeds 8:867870.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Yamazaki, M., and Murakoshi, I. 1992. Transgenic medicinal plants: agrobacterium mediated gene transfer and production of secondary metabolites. J. Nat. Prod. 55:149162.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E., 1989. Herbicides for killing tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) infected with fescue endophyte (Acremonium coenophialum). Weed Technol. 3:485489.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J., 1981. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in water seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 29:663666.Google Scholar
Tachibana, K., and Kaneko, K. 1986. Development of a new herbicide, Bialaphos J. Pestic. Sci. 11:297304.Google Scholar
Tachibana, K., Watanabe, T., Sekizawa, Y., and Takematsu, T. 1986. Inhibition of glutamine synthetase and quantitative changes of free fatty acids in shoots of bialaphos treated Japanese barnyard millet. J. Pestic. Sci. 11:2731.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. T., 1993. Agricultural Chemicals, Book II: Herbicides. Fresno, CA: Thomson Publications. 308 p.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., and Swann, C. W. 1990. Timing of paraquat applications in weed control in Virginia-type peanuts (Arachis hypogea). Weed Sci. 38: 558562.Google Scholar