Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:14:28.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of cover crop sensitivity to residual herbicides applied in the previous soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] crop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2019

Derek M. Whalen Open the ORCID record for Derek M. Whalen [Opens in a new window] ,
Mandy D. Bish ,
Bryan G. Young ,
Aaron G. Hager ,
Shawn P. Conley ,
Daniel B. Reynolds ,
Lawrence E. Steckel ,
Jason K. Norsworthy  and
Kevin W. Bradley
Derek M. Whalen*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
Mandy D. Bish
Affiliation:
Extension Weed Specialist, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Aaron G. Hager
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
Shawn P. Conley
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
Daniel B. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA
Lawrence E. Steckel
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Jackson, TN, USA
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Kevin W. Bradley
Affiliation:
Professor, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Derek M. Whalen, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, the use of cover crops has increased in U.S. crop production systems. An important aspect of successful cover crop establishment is the preceding crop and herbicide program, because some herbicides have the potential to persist in the soil for several months. Few studies have been conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of cover crops to common residual herbicides used in soybean production. The same field experiment was conducted in 2016 in Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, and repeated in Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, and Missouri in 2017 to evaluate the potential of residual soybean herbicides to carryover and reduce cover crop establishment. Herbicides applied during the soybean growing season included acetochlor; acetochlor plus fomesafen; chlorimuron plus thifensulfuron; fomesafen; fomesafen plus S-metolachlor followed by acetochlor; imazethapyr; pyroxasulfone; S-metolachlor; S-metolachlor plus fomesafen; sulfentrazone plus S-metolachlor; sulfentrazone plus S-metolachlor followed by fomesafen plus S-metolachlor; and sulfentrazone plus S-metolachlor followed by fomesafen plus S-metolachlor followed by acetochlor. Across all herbicide treatments, the sensitivity of cover crops to herbicide residues in the fall, from greatest to least, was forage radish = turnip > annual ryegrass = winter oat = triticale > cereal rye = Austrian winter pea = hairy vetch = wheat > crimson clover. Fomesafen (applied 21 and 42 days after planting [(DAP]); chlorimuron plus thifensulfuron and pyroxasulfone applied 42 DAP; sulfentrazone plus S-metolachlor followed by fomesafen plus S-metolachlor; and sulfentrazone plus S-metolachlor followed by fomesafen plus S-metolachlor followed by acetochlor caused the highest visual ground cover reduction to cover crop species at the fall rating. Study results indicate cover crops are most at risk when following herbicide applications in soybean containing certain active ingredients such as fomesafen, but overall there is a fairly low risk of cover crop injury from residual soybean herbicides applied in the previous soybean crop.

Keywords

Mark VanGessel, University of DelawareCover crop establishmentground cover reductionherbicide carryover injuryAcetochlorchlorimuronfomesafenimazethapyrpyroxasulfoneS-metolachlorsulfentrazonethifensulfuronannual ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum Lam.Austrian winter pea, Pisum sativum L.cereal rye, Secale cereal L.crimson clover, Trifolium incarnatum L.hairy vetch, Vicia villosa Rothturnip, Brassica campestris L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrforage radish, Raphanus sativus L.triticale, Triticosecale rimpauiwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum Lwinter oat, Avena sativa L.
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 312 - 320
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2018) Flexstar® herbicide product label. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld6BM003.pdf. Accessed: March 14, 2018Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, S, Nyquist, W, Walker, W (1989) Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two-or three-factor treatment designs. Agron J 81:665–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquhoun, J (2006) Herbicide persistence and carryover. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Extension A3819 p.Google Scholar
Cornelius, CD, Bradley, KW (2017) Carryover of common corn and soybean herbicides to various cover crop species. Weed Technol 31:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conservation Technology Information Center (2008) National crop residue management survey. http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/crm_results/. Accessed: January 12, 2018Google Scholar
Gevao, B, Semple, KT, Jones, KC (2000) Bound pesticide residues in soils: a review. Environ Pollution 108:3–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goetz, AJ, Lavy, TL, Gbur, EE (1990) Degradation and field persistence of imazethapyr. Weed Sci 38:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helling, C (2005) The science of soil residual herbicides. Pages 3–22 in Van Acker, RC, ed. Soil Residual Herbicides: Science and Management. Topics in Canadian Weed Science. Volume 3. Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada: Canadian Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Jablonkai, I (2000) Microbial and photolytic degradation of the herbicide acetochlor. Int J Environ Anal Chem 78:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, DH, Talbert, RE (1993) Imazaquin, chlorimuron, and fomesafen may injure rotational vegetables and sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Technol 7:573–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karcher, DE, Richardson, MD (2003) Quantifying turfgrass color using digital image analysis. Crop Sci 43:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karcher, DE, Richardson, MD (2005) Batch analysis of digital images to evaluate turfgrass characteristics. Crop Sci 45:1536–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, JW, Matches, AG, Brown, CP, Karnezos, TP (1996) Comparison of interseeded legumes and small grains for cover crop establishment in cotton. Agron J 88:219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, WC, McWhorter, CG (1986) Weed control in conservation tillage. J Soil Water Conserv 41:365–370Google Scholar
Martinez, CO, de Souza Silva, CMM, Fay, EF, Abakerli, RB, Maia, AdHN, Durrant, LR (2008) The effects of moisture and temperature on the degradation of sulfentrazone. Geoderma 147:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Climatic Data Center (2018) https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/. Accessed: March 2, 2018Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(SI 1):31–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palhano, MG, Norsworthy, JK, Barber, T (2018) Sensitivity and likelihood of residual herbicide carryover to cover crops. Weed Technol:1–8Google Scholar
Pekarek, RA, Garvey, PV, Monks, DW, Jennings, KM, MacRae, AW (2010) Sulfentrazone carryover to vegetables and cotton. Weed Technol 24:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D, Harvey, C, Resosudarmo, P, Sinclair, K, Kurz, D, McNair, M, Crist, S, Shpritz, L, Fitton, L, Saffouri, R (1995) Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267:1117–1123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, KN, Zablotowicz, RM, Locke, MA, Koger, CH (2003) Cover crop tillage, and herbicide effect on weeds, soil properties, microbial populations, and soybean yield. Weed Sci 51:987–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggins, CW, Tranel, PJ (2012) Will the Amaranthus tuberculatus resistance mechanism to PPO-inhibiting herbicides evolve in other Amaranthus species. Int J Agron 2012:7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, D (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. p 315Google Scholar
Sharma, S, Banerjee, K, Choudhury, PP (2012) Degradation of chlorimuron-ethyl by Aspergillus niger isolated from agricultural soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 337:18–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D, Ruark, M (2017) Considerations for 2017 cover crop interseeding. Integrated Pest and Crop Management. WCM NewsletterGoogle Scholar
Smith, DH (2015) Cover Crop and Herbicide Interaction. Master of Science thesis. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. 92 pGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S, Wax, LM, Nelson, R (2001) Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone or flumioxazin. Weed Technol 15:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, BE, Kells, JJ (2000) Effect of soil-applied herbicides on establishment of cover crop species. Weed Technol 14:596–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uri, ND (2000) Perceptions on the use of no-till farming in production agriculture in the United States: an analysis of survey results. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77:263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A, Barnes, A (1981) Simulation of herbicide persistence in soil; a revised computer model. Pest Manag Sci 12:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, J, Defelice, M, Sims, B (1993a) Influence of tillage on soybean (Glycine max) herbicide carryover to grass and legume forage crops in Missouri. Weed Sci 41:144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, JD, Defelice, MS, Sims, BD (1993b) Soybean (Glycine max) herbicide carryover to grain and fiber crops. Weed Technol 7:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, EP, Shaner, DL, Westra, PH, Chapman, PL (2014) Dissipation and leaching of pyroxasulfone and S-metolachlor. Weed Technol 28:72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, WW (1984) Response of weeds and herbicides under no-tillage conditions. Pages 152–170 in Phillips, RE, Phillips, SH, eds. No-Tillage Agriculture: Principles and Practices. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishing Co., IncCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, L, Van Eerd, LL, O’Halloran, I, Sikkema, PH, Robinson, DE (2015) Response of four fall-seeded cover crops to residues of selected herbicides. Crop Protect 75:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar