Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:16:57.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Established Foxtail Barley, Hordeum jubatum, Control with Glyphosate Plus Ammonium Sulfate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William W. Donald
William W. Donald*
Affiliation:
USDA, Metab. Radiat. Res. Lab. and Dep. Agron., N. D. State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spread of perennial weeds, such as foxtail barley, is a prime deterrent to adoption of no-till cereal production in the Northern Great Plains. In a 3-yr study, the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate at 0.56 kg ai/ha plus nonionic surfactant at 0.25% (v/v) did not control established perennial foxtail barley in early spring. However, adding ammonium sulfate at 2.8 kg/ha to glyphosate plus surfactant improved the effectiveness and year-to-year consistency of glyphosate for killing this weed. This spring treatment fits into no-till farm practice in the Northern Great Plains, providing no-till farmers with a defined strategy to manage this perennial bunch-grass weed.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinefoxtail barley, Hordeum jubatum L. #5 HORJUHerbicideadditivesadjuvantsperennial grass weedHORJU
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 364 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Best, K. F., Banting, J. D., and Bowes, G. G. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds. 31. Hordeum jubatum L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:699–708.Google Scholar
2. Blair, A. M. 1975. The addition of ammonium salts or a phosphate ester to herbicides to control Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Weed Res. 15:101–105.Google Scholar
3. Bowes, G. G. 1984. Use of propyzamide to control foxtail barley in Russian wild ryegrass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:725–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Braidek, J. T., Fedec, P., and Jones, D. 1984. Field survey of halophytic plants of disturbed sites on the Canadian Prairies. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:745–751.Google Scholar
5. Cords, H. P. 1960. Factors affecting competitive ability of foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum). Weeds 8:636–644.Google Scholar
6. Donald, W. W. 1987. Established foxtail barley control in spring, 1985. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:298.Google Scholar
7. Donald, W. W. 1987. Established foxtail barley control in spring, 1986. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:299.Google Scholar
8. Donald, W. W. 1987. Established foxtail barley control in spring with fall-applied herbicides, 1985–1986. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:287.Google Scholar
9. Donald, W. W. 1987. Established foxtail barley control in spring with fall-applied herbicides, 1986–1987. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:289.Google Scholar
10. Donald, W. W. 1987. Established foxtail barley control in spring with glyphosate plus 2,4-D. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:301.Google Scholar
11. Donald, W. W. 1987. Seedling foxtail barley control in spring with fall-applied herbicides, 1986. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:300.Google Scholar
12. Donald, W. W. 1987. Seedling foxtail barley control in spring with fall-applied trifluralin. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:288.Google Scholar
13. Hitchcock, A. S. 1950. Manual of Grasses of the United States. 2nd ed. Dover Publications, New York. p. 268–269.Google Scholar
14. Hoffman, G. R., Hogan, M. B., and Stanely, L. D. 1980. Germination of plant species common to reservoir shores in the Northern Great Plains. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107:506–513.Google Scholar
15. Moshier, L. J. 1980. Response of honeyvine milkweed (Ampelamus albidus) to herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 28:722–724.Google Scholar
16. North Dakota Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. 1977. N. D. Crop Weather Bull. 1965–1976. p. 8.Google Scholar
17. Simnacher, R., Alley, H., and Burrough, L. 1981. Selective control of foxtail barley in grass stands in western Wyoming. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 34:96–97.Google Scholar
18. Suwunnamek, U., and Parker, C. 1975. Control of Cyperus rotundus with glyphosate: the influence of ammonium sulfate and other additives. Weed Res. 15:13–20.Google Scholar
19. Turner, D. J. 1985. Effects on glyphosate performance of formulation, additives and mixing with other herbicides. p. 221–240 in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Butterworths Publishers, Woburn, MA.Google Scholar
20. Turner, D. J. 1985. Improved control of Stellaria media (L.) Vill in leys with Trifolium repens, using bentazone and benazolin with additives. Weed Res. 25:289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Turner, D. J., and Loader, M.P.C. 1972. Some increases in efficacy of foliage applied herbicidal salts due to the addition of ammonium ions. Proc. 11th Br. Weed Control Conf. p. 654–660.Google Scholar
22. Turner, D. J., and Loader, M.P.C. 1984. Effect of ammonium sulfate and related salts on the phytotoxicity of dichlorprop and other herbicides used for broadleaved weed control in cereals. Weed Res. 24:67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Ungar, I. A., and Riehl, T. E. 1980. The effect of seed reserves on species composition in zonal halophyte communities. Bot. Gaz. 141:447–452.Google Scholar
24. Wilson, B. J., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1975. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of picloram activity and absorption. Weed Sci. 23:289–296.Google Scholar