Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:35:35.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy and Economics of Weed Control Programs in Glyphosate-Resistant Potato (Solanum tuberosum)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pamela J. S. Hutchinson ,
Dennis J. Tonks  and
Brent R. Beutler
Pamela J. S. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID, 83210
Dennis J. Tonks
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Davenport, WA, 99122
Brent R. Beutler
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID, 83210
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to evaluate weed control, tuber yield, gross return, economic return on investment (EROI), and net return in glyphosate-resistant ‘Ranger Russet’ potato in 2000 and 2001 at the University of Idaho Aberdeen Research and Extension Center near Aberdeen, ID. Three types of weed control programs were evaluated: a total glyphosate program of single or sequential applications (TGLY), tank mixtures of glyphosate and residual herbicides applied early postemergence (GLY + RES EPOST), and residual preemergence herbicides followed by (fb) a late postemergence glyphosate application (RES PRE fb LPOST GLY). A standard rimsulfuron + metribuzin + nonionic surfactant EPOST treatment was included for comparison. The standard EPOST treatment and all glyphosate-containing treatments controlled hairy nightshade 88 to 99%. RES PRE fb LPOST GLY treatments improved hairy nightshade control compared with the RES PRE components applied alone. All herbicide treatments controlled kochia 87 to 99% and green foxtail 87 to 100%. Redroot pigweed and common lambsquarters were controlled ≥85 and ≥89%, respectively, by all herbicide treatments except a single EPOST application of glyphosate at 420 g ae/ha. Depending on the year, sequential applications of glyphosate, GLY + RES EPOST, or RES PRE fb GLY LPOST treatments controlled weeds better than single EPOST glyphosate applications. Single LPOST glyphosate applications generally controlled kochia, redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and green foxtail better than single EPOST applications. However, single EPOST glyphosate applications controlled hairy nightshade better than a single LPOST application of glyphosate at 420 g/ha. RES PRE fb GLY LPOST treatments improved redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and green foxtail control, compared with the RES PRE components applied alone, depending on the RES PRE component and the year. Sequential applications of glyphosate at 840 g ae/ha and the standard nonglyphosate EPOST, GLY + RES EPOST, and RES PRE fb GLY LPOST treatments generally provided similar weed control. No crop injury was observed as a result of any herbicide treatment. Sequential applications of glyphosate at 840 g/ha had better tuber yields and economic returns than a single EPOST or LPOST application of glyphosate at 420 g/ha or a single LPOST application of glyphosate at 840 g/ha. A single EPOST application of glyphosate at 420 g/ha had lower tuber yields and economic returns than a single EPOST application of glyphosate at 840 g/ha. The RES PRE alone treatments, except metribuzin + pendimethalin, had similar tuber yields, EROI, and net returns as sequential applications of glyphosate at 840 g/ha. Glyphosate + rimsulfuron resulted in lower tuber yields than sequential applications of glyphosate at 840 g/ha, whereas EROI and net returns were similar. All other combinations of glyphosate and residual herbicides except glyphosate + pendimethalin EPOST, had similar tuber yields, EROI, and net returns as sequential applications of glyphosate at 840 g/ha.

Keywords

Glyphosatemetribuzinpendimethalinrimsulfuroncommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEALgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVIhairy nightshade, Solanum sarrachoides L. Sendt. # SOLSAkochia, Kochia scoparia L. Shrad. # KCHSCredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREpotato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Ranger Russet’Economic return on investmentgross returnnet returnsequentialtuber yieldAMS, ammonium sulfateEPOST, early postemergenceEROI, economic return on investmentfb, followed byGLY + RES EPOST, glyphosate + residual herbicide early postemergenceLPOST, late postemergenceMT, metric tonPNW, Pacific NorthwestPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceRES PRE fb GLY LPOST, residual preemergence herbicide followed by glyphosate late postemergenceTGLY, total glyphosate programWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 854 - 865
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2001. Roundup Original Herbicide Label. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto Company. 15 p.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 13:308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beutler, B. R., Hutchinson, P. J. S., Patterson, P. E., Eberlein, C. V., and Tonks, D. J. 2002. Two- and three-way tank mixtures for preemergence weed control in potatoes: efficacy and economics. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 55:47.Google Scholar
Callihan, R. H. and Bellinder, R. R. 1993. Management of weeds. In Rowe, R. C., ed. Potato Health Management. St. Paul, MN: APS. Pp. 95–102.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B. and Kells, J. J. 1995. Timing of total postemergence herbicide application to maximize weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol. 9:356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J. and Gianessi, L. 1999. Herbicide tolerant soybeans: why growers are adopting Roundup Ready varieties. Agbioforum. 2:65–72. Web page: http://www.agbiofurm.org/.Google Scholar
Clayton, G. W., Harker, K. N., O'Donovan, J. T., Baig, M. N., and Kidnie, M. J. 2002. Glyphosate timing and tillage system effects on glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Weed Technol. 16:124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1998. Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. J. Cotton Sci 2:174–185.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1999. Weed management and net returns with transgenic, herbicide-resistant, and non-transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 13:411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbels, A. F. and Loux, M. M. 1997. Weed competition in glyphosate tolerant soybean. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 52:127.Google Scholar
Duffy, M. and Ernst, M. 1999. Does planting GMO seed boost farmers' profits? Leopold Lett 11:1–5.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Patterson, P. E., Guttieri, M. J., and Stark, J. C. 1997. Efficacy and economics of cultivation for weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 11:257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Tonks, D. J., Guttieri, M. J., and Fletcher, F. E. 1998. Weed control in glyphosate-tolerant potatoes. 1998 Idaho Weed Control Rep. Moscow, ID: Department of Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences. Pp. 52–54.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Whitmore, J. C., Stanger, C. E., and Guttieri, M. J. 1994. Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 8:425–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J. M. and Griffin, J. L. 2002. Benefits of soil-applied herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:541–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faircloth, W. H., Patterson, M. G., Monks, C. D., and Goodman, W. R. 2001. Weed management programs for glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 15:544–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, S. A., Loux, M. M., Cardina, J., and Harrison, S. K. 2002. Effect of planting date, residual herbicide, and postemergence application timing on weed control and grains yield in glyphosate-tolerant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:488–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, T. L. and Raymer, P. 2002. Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and red morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) control in glyphosate-resistant soybean with narrow rows and postemergence herbicide mixtures. Weed Technol. 16:669–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttieri, M. J. and Eberlein, C. V. 1997. Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 11:755–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, M. J., Reese, P. F. Jr., and Flint, J. L. 1998. Early season weed control in Roundup Ready soybeans: effect on yield. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 53:130.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Pavek, M. J., Tonks, D. J., and Eberlein, C. V. 2000. Weed control in glyphosate-tolerant potatoes. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 53:75.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Bradley, P. R., Hart, S. E., Buesinger, M. L., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 2001. Influence of weed competition and herbicides on glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:530–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, S. L., Pavek, J. J., Corsini, D. L., Stark, J. C., Whitmore, J. C., and Bohl, W. H. 1998. Cultural Management of Ranger Russet Potatoes. CIS 919 (rev.). Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Cooperative Extension System. 4 p.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. J., Bussan, A. J., Evans, J. O., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Peeper, T. F. 2002. Pest management implications of glyphosate-resistant wheat (Triticum aestivum) in the western United States. Weed Technol. 16:680–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, S. A. and Young, B. G. 2002a. Efficacy and economic return on investment for conventional and herbicide-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, S. A. and Young, B. G. 2002b. Efficacy and economic return on investment for conventional and herbicide-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:388–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. L., Shaw, D. R., and Snipes, C. E. 2001. Weed control from herbicide combinations with three formulations of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15:552–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, P. E., Bohl, W. H., and Smathers, R. L. 2002. Southeastern Idaho Crop Costs and Return Estimates: South District Russet Burbank Commercial Potatoes: No Storage. EBB4-Po1-01., Moscow, ID: University of Idaho, College of Agriculture Cooperative Extension System. 4 p.Google Scholar
Patterson, P. E. and Smathers, R. L. 2001. Idaho Crop Input Price Summary for 2001: Agricultural Economics Extension Series No. 01-15. Moscow, ID: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Idaho. 20 p.Google Scholar
Payne, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 2000. Weed control programs in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 14:413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Heatherly, L. G., and Blain, A. 1999. Weed management. in Heatherly, L. G. and Hodges, H., eds. Soybean Production in the Mid-South. Boca Raton, FL.: CRC Press. Pp. 171–195.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Whiting, K. 2000. Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-tolerant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems. Weed Technol. 14:204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riches, C. R. and Valverde, B. E. 2002. Agricultural and biological diversity in Latin America: implications for development, testing, and commercialization of herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 16:200–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1998. Glyphosate tank mixtures with SAN 582 for burndown or postemergence application in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. R. and Arnold, J. C. 2002. Weed control from herbicide combinations with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 16:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, B. E. and Kells, J. J. 2002. Residual herbicides used in combination with glyphosate and glufosinate in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonks, D. J. and Eberlein, C. V. 2001. Postemergence weed control with rimsulfuron and various adjuvants in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 15:613–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonks, D. J., Eberlein, C. V., and Guttieri, M. J. 2000. Preemergence weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with ethalfluralin. Weed Technol. 14:287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., and Majek, B. A. 2000. Optimum glyphosate timing with or without residual herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) under full-season conventional tillage. Weed Technol. 14:140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:478–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S. E. 1991. Size-dependent economic thresholds for three broadleaf weeds in soybeans. Weed Technol. 5:674–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesbrook, M. L., Johnson, W. G., Hart, S. E., Bradley, P. R., and Wax, L. M. 2001. Comparison of weed management systems in narrow-row, glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G., Yonts, C. D., and Smith, J. A. 2002. Influence of glyphosate and glufosinate on weed control and sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) yield in herbicide-tolerant sugarbeet. Weed Technol. 16:66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. L., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Fay, P. K., Thill, D. C., Westra, P., and Trunkle, P. A. 1993. The frequency of sulfonylurea herbicide resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia L. Shrad) in Colorado, Idaho, and Montana. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 46:75.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Young, J. M., Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., Wax, L. M., and Kapusta, G. 2001. Weed management in narrow- and wide-row glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar