Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:49:05.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Rain-Free Intervals and Herbicide Rate on Sicklepod (Cassia Obtusifolia) Control and Absorption with AC 263,222

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry J. Newsom  and
David R. Shaw
Larry J. Newsom
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of a 2.5-cm simulated rainfall 0.05, 0.25, 0.5,1, 3, 6, and 24 h after POST applications of AC 263,222 to sicklepod. Fresh weight reductions were directly related to increasing AC 263,222 rates and rain-free intervals. Fresh weight reductions with 9, 18, 36, 54, and 72 g ai/ha AC 263,222 were 32, 47, 55, 59, and 67%, respectively, with the rain-free treatment. A simulated rainfall 0.05 h after POST application lowered fresh weight reductions with 9, 18, 36, 54, and 72 g/ha AC 263,222 to 5, 7, 19, 23, and 28%, respectively, of the untreated control. As AC 263,222 rates increased, a simulated rainfall shortly after POST application was less detrimental. At 18 g/ha of AC 263,222, a 3-h rain-free interval was necessary for fresh weight reductions equivalent to the rain-free control. As the rate of AC 263,222 increased to 54 g/ha, the rain-free interval for fresh weight reductions equivalent to the rain-free control was reduced to 1 h. Radiolabeled studies indicated that at 3 h after application an equivalent amount of 14C was accumulated in the plant as compared with the rain-free control. The correlation coefficients for fresh weight reductions and 14C in the plant were r = 0.53, 0.75, 0.68, 0.74, and 0.70 at rates of 9, 18, 36, 54, and 72 g/ha AC 263,222, respectively.

Keywords

AC 263,222, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBHerbicide washoffsimulated rainfall
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 621 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. A. 1981. Influence of rainfall on the phytotoxicity of foliarly applied 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 29:349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W. and Diaz-Colon, J. D. 1969. Effect of simulated rainfall on herbicide performance. Weed Sci. 17:154–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., and Whisenant, S. G. 1990. Effect of simulated rainfall on herbicide performance in huisache (Acacia farnesiana) and honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Technol. 4:26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bryson, C. T. 1987. Effects of rainfall on foliar herbicides applied to rhizome johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 35:115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bryson, C. T. 1988. Effects of rainfall on foliar herbicides applied to seedling johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 2:153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Bryson, C. T. 1993. Effects of rainfall on DPX-PE350 applied to selected broadleaf weeds. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:261.Google Scholar
7. Colvin, D. L. and Brecke, B. J. 1993. Cadre rate and time of application for peanut (Arachis hypogaea) weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:30.Google Scholar
8. Doran, D. L. and Anderson, R. N. 1975. Effects of simulated rainfall on bentazon activity. Weed Sci. 23:105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:400–404.Google Scholar
10. Edmund, R. M. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Effects of rainfall and temperature on postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025. Weed Sci. 35:231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Grichar, W. J. and Nester, P. R. 1993. Control of nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) in peanut with Cadre. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:71.Google Scholar
12. Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Bruff, S. A. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 7:331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Hubbard, T. F. Jr. 1993. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 263,222 in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), soybean (Glycine max), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 41:523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imidazolinones: potent inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Shelton, C. H., von Bernuth, R. D., and Rajbhandari, S. P. 1985. A continuous-application rainfall simulator. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 28:1115–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Smeda, R. J. and Putnam, A. R. 1990. Influence of temperature, rainfall, grass species, and growth stage on efficacy of fluazifop. Weed Technol. 4:349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Use of AC 263,222 for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:434–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Effects of soil-applied AC 263,222 on crops rotated with soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar