Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:21:59.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Halosulfuron on Weed Control in Commercial Honeydew Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lynn P. Brandenberger ,
Ronald E. Talbert ,
Robert P. Wiedenfeld ,
James W. Shrefler ,
Charles L. Webber III  and
Mayank S. Malik
Lynn P. Brandenberger*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State University, 360 Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078-6027
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Robert P. Wiedenfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M Research and Extension Center, 2415 East Highway, 83, Weslaco, TX 78596
James W. Shrefler
Affiliation:
WWAREC Box 128, Lane, OK 74555-0128
Charles L. Webber III
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, SCARL, P.O. Box 159 Lane, OK 74555;
Mayank S. Malik
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted at four sites during a 2-yr period in Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas to determine effectiveness and safety of halosulfuron in honeydew crops. Halosulfuron applied postemergence at 26.3 to 78.8 g ai/ha controlled yellow nutsedge 85 to 97%, golden crownbeard 100%, and tumble pigweed 83 to 95%. Control of yellow nutsedge continued to increase for 3 to 6 wk after treatment. Golden crownbeard and tumble pigweed efficacy increased to its highest levels after 4 and 3 wk, respectively. Reduced crop growth and yellowing of foliage did not exceed 13%. No differences were recorded for yield, earliness, or percentage of marketable fruit.

Keywords

Halosulfurongolden crownbeard, Verbesina encelioides (Cav.) Benth. & Hook. f.ex Gray # VEEENtumble pigweed, Amaranthus albus L. # AMAALyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPEShoneydew, Cucumus melo L. Inodorus group ‘Honeybrew’Melon crops, mulch, plasticulture, plastic mulchPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 346 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Boyhan, G. B., Kovach, S. P., Norton, J. D., Abrahams, B. R., Hollingsworth, M. H., and Dangler, J. M. 1995. Preemergent herbicides for cantaloupe and watermelon. J. Veg. Crop Prod. 1:79–92.Google Scholar
Buker, R. S. III and Stall, W. M. 2001. Halosulfuron rate and timing application affects on summer squash and muskmelon. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:77.Google Scholar
Correll, D. S. and Johnston, M. C. 1979. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Richardson, TX: University of Texas at Dallas. Pp. 1656–1657.Google Scholar
Czarnota, M. A. and Bingham, S. W. 1997. Control of yellow and purple nutsedges (Cyperus esculentus and Cyperus rotundus) in turfgrass with MON-12051. Weed Technol. 11:460–465.Google Scholar
Djigma, A. and Diemkouma, D. 1986. Plastic mulch in dry tropical zones. Trials on vegetable crops in Burkina Faso. Plasticulture 69:19–24.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Goldwasser, Y., Achdary, G., and Hershemhorn, J. 2003. The potential of sulfosulfuron to control troublesome weeds in tomato. Weed Technol. 17:133–137.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A. and Richard, S. J. 1999. Screening of Low Rate Herbicides in Vegetable Crops. Moscow, ID: West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. Pp. 44–46.Google Scholar
Fry, J. D., Dernoeden, P. H., Upham, W. S., and Qian, Y. L. 1995. Safety and efficacy of halosulfuron-methyl for yellow nutsedge topkill in cool-season turf. HortScience 30:285–288.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Sestak, D. C. 1998. Control of golden crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides) in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with postemergence herbicides. Peanut Sci. 25:39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Sestak, D. C. 2000. Herbicide systems for golden crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides) control in peanut. Peanut Sci. 27:23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. C. and Mullinix, B. G. 2002. Weed management in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) transplanted on polyethylene-covered seedbeds. Weed Technol. 16:860–866.Google Scholar
Manley, B. S., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996. Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and livid amaranth (A. lividus) response to several imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 10:835–841.Google Scholar
Masiunas, J., McGiffen, M., Wilen, C., Bell, C., Lanini, T., Derr, J., and Kolasani, G. 1997. Integrated weed management in horticultural crops. in McGiffen, M. E., ed. Weed Management in Horticultural Crops: An American Society for Horticultural Science and Weed Science Society of America Joint Workshop. Alexandria, VA: ASHS. Pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
Miller, T. W. and Libbey, C. R. 1999. Tolerance of Cucumber, Squash, and Pumpkin to Several Herbicides. Moscow, ID: West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. Pp. 62–64.Google Scholar
Monks, D. W. and Schultheis, J. R. 1998. Critical weed-free period for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) in transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Sci. 46:530–532.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 2002. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control and tuber production with glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 16:512–519.Google Scholar
Nerson, H. 1989. Weed competition in muskmelon and its effects on yield and fruit quality. Crop Prot. 8:439–442.Google Scholar
Riley, D. G., Edelson, J. V., Roberts, R. E., Roe, N., Miller, M. E., Cuperus, G., and Anciso, J. 1998. Integrated Pest Management in Cucurbit Crops in South-Central USA: Pest Status, Attitudes Toward IPM and a Plan for Implementation:. Web page: http://www.joe.org/joe/1998august/a3.html. Accessed: February 10, 2005.Google Scholar
Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). II. Tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus). Weed Sci. 33:815–818.Google Scholar
Shrefler, J. W., Roberts, B. W., Edelson, J. V., Duthie, J. A., and Taylor, M. J. 1998. Assessment of currently available and potential tools for controlling weeds in watermelon. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:93.Google Scholar
Sweat, J. K., Horak, M. J., Peterson, D. E., Lloyd, R. W., and Boyer, J. E. 1998. Herbicide efficacy on four Amaranthus species in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:315–321.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Schmidt, L. A., and Wells, J. A. 1998. Field evaluation of herbicides on small fruit, vegetable, and ornamental crops 1998. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stat. Res. Ser. 466:11–12.Google Scholar
Umeda, K. 2002. Efficacy and safety of new herbicides for melon production in the desert southwest United States. in Maynard, D., ed. Cucurbitaceae. Alexandria, VA: ASHS. Pp. 404–408.Google Scholar
Van Biljon, J. J., Hugo, K. J., and Van Der Merwe, C. J. 1996. Post-emergence control of Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus in maize with halosulfuron. Appl. Plant Sci. 10:52–54.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 235–237.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Richburg, J. S., Wilcut, J. W., and Hawf, L. R. 1995. Effect of MON-12037 on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow (Cyperus esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Technol. 9:148–152.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Johnson, W. C. III, Dowler, C. C., Csinos, A. S., Johnson, A. W., and Sumner, D. R. 2000. Vegetable weed management using alternatives to methyl bromide. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:61.Google Scholar
William, R. D. and Warren, G. F. 1975. Competition between purple nutsedge and vegetables. Weed Sci. 23:317–323.Google Scholar