Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:52:06.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Application Variables on Glyphosate Phytotoxicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas D. Buhler
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Orvin C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genet., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] toxicity to volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA] was influenced more by carrier volume than application method. Glyphosate phytotoxicity increased when carrier volume was reduced with both application methods. When compared at equal carrier volumes, there was little difference in volunteer wheat or large crabgrass control when glyphosate was applied with a controlled droplet applicator or flat fan nozzles. Volunteer wheat and large crabgrass control with controlled droplet applicators was influenced by application factors. At a given carrier volume, application factors which yielded larger droplets generally resulted in superior vegetation control.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahmadi, M. S., Haderlie, L. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Effect of growth stage and water stress on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control and on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 28:277282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ambach, R. M., and Ashford, R. 1982. Effect of variations in drop makeup on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 30:221224.Google Scholar
3. Bals, E. J. 1978. The reasons for CDA (controlled droplet application). Br. Crop Prot. Conf., Weeds. 2:659666.Google Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D., and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci. 31:124130.Google Scholar
5. Buhler, D. D., and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 31:163169.Google Scholar
6. Chappell, W. E., and Link, L. A. 1977. Evaluation of herbicides in no-tillage production of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Weed Sci. 25:511514.Google Scholar
7. Doll, J. D., and Drost, D. C. 1980. The controlled droplet applicator for postemergence herbicides. Proc. Wis. Fert., Aglime, and Pest Manage. Conf. 19:1319.Google Scholar
8. Eberlein, C., and Burrill, L. C. 1979. Quackgrass control with glyphosate applied with a controlled droplet applicator. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Progress Rep. p. 24.Google Scholar
9. Nelson, J. E., and Becker, R. L. 1981. Influence of application rate and carrier gallonage on the efficacy of several herbicides using controlled droplet and conventional application methods. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:3.Google Scholar
10. O'Sullivan, P. A., O'Donovan, J. T., and Hammon, W. M. 1981. Influence of nonionic surfactants, ammonium sulfate, water quality and spray volume on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:391400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Pearson, S. L., Bode, L. E., and Butler, B. J. 1981. Characteristics of controlled droplet applicators. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:13.Google Scholar
12. Taylor, W. A. 1978. Controlled droplet application (CDA). Technical Leaflet No. 3. Agric. Res. Council. Weed Res. Org. Oxford, England. Google Scholar
13. Wyrill, J. B. III, and Burnside, O. C. 1977. Glyphosate toxicity to common milkweed and hemp dogbane as influenced by surfactants. Weed Sci. 25:275287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar