Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:30:20.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Sulfonylurea Herbicides on Egyptian Broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca) in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) under Greenhouse Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joseph Hershenhorn
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Yaakov Goldwasser
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Dina Plakhine
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Yael Lavan
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Geza Herzlinger
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Shmuel Golan
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Taha Chilf
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Yeshaiahu Kleifeld
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel

Abstract

A time course of Egyptian broomrape development on tomato roots grown in pots in the greenhouse revealed an increase in the number of parasitic attachments from 2.6 at 4 weeks after planting (WAP) to 139 when rated 2 wk later. Rimsulfuron sprayed on tomato foliage as single and split applications (12.5 g ai/ha) 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 WAP did not decrease Egyptian broomrape damage to tomato plants, as expressed by reduced tomato plant height and fresh weight, and the total number of parasitic attachments on the roots was not significantly different compared to the nontreated control. A single foliar application of rimsulfuron (25 g ai/ha) to tomato at 10 days after planting (DAP) and split applications at 10 and 20 and 10, 20, and 30 DAP significantly reduced the number of Egyptian broomrape inflorescences to 2.2, 0.2, and 0, respectively, 9 WAP compared with 19.6 inflorescences in the nontreated control. Application of the herbicide under the same conditions to tomato plants in pots covered with activated charcoal did not significantly influence the number of Egyptian broomrape inflorescences. Chlorsulfuron and triasulfuron applied directly to the soil at rates ≥ 3: 3.75 g ai/ha completely controlled Egyptian broomrape. Primisulfuron and chlorimuron, each at 22.5 g ai/ha, reduced the number of inflorescences to 0.6 and 0.4, respectively. Chlorimuron did not significantly reduce the total number of parasitic attachments on the roots, but primisulfuron at the same concentration significantly increased the total number of parasitic attachments on the root system to 50 as compared to 23 in the nontreated control. Tribenuron had no effect on the parasitism process, as reflected in the number of inflorescences and parasitic attachments on the roots.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bewick, T. A., Smith, K., Stall, W. M., and Olson, S. M. 1995. Tomato (<i>Lycopersicon esculentum</i>) cultivar and weed sensitivity to DPX-E9636. Weed Technol. 9:499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foy, C. L., Jain, R., and Jacobsohn, R. 1989. Recent approaches for chemical control of broomrape (<i>Orobanche</i> spp.). Rev. Weed Sci. 4:123152.Google Scholar
Garcia-Torres, L., and Lopez-Granados, F. 1991. Control of broomrape (<i>Orobanche crenata</i> Forsk.) in broad bean (<i>Vicia faba</i> L.) with imidazolinone and other herbicides. Weed Res. 31:227235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J., Kleifeld, Y., and Joel, D. M. 1994. Genetic engineering can help control parasitic weeds. <i>In</i> Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on <i>Orobanche</i> and related <i>Striga</i> Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute. pp. 406418.Google Scholar
Hershenhorn, J., Plakhine, D., Goldwasser, Y., Westwood, J. H., Foy, C. L., and Kleifeld, Y. 1998. Effect of sulfonylurea herbicides on early development of Egyptian broomrape (<i>Orobanche aegyptiaca</i>). Weed Technol. 12:108114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joel, D. M., Kleifeld, Y., Losner-Goshen, D., Herzlinger, G., and Gressel, J. 1995. Transgenic crops to fight parasitic weeds. Nature 374:220221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasasian, L., 1973. Control of <i>Orobanche</i>. PANS 19:368371.Google Scholar
Kasasian, L., and Parker, C. 1971. The effects of numerous herbicides on germination of <i>Orobanche aegyptica</i> and <i>Striga hermontheca</i>. PANS 17: 471481.Google Scholar
Kleifeld, Y., Goldwasser, Y., Herzlinger, G., Golan, S., Blumenfeld, T., and Buxbaum, H. 1994. Selective control of broomrape in tomatoes with rimsulfuron. <i>In</i> Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on <i>Orobanche</i> and related <i>Striga</i> Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute. pp. 561571.Google Scholar
Parker, C., and Riches, C. 1993. <i>Orobanche</i> species: the broomrapes. <i>In</i> Parker, C. and Riches, C., eds. Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press. pp. 111164.Google Scholar
Parker, C., and Wilson, A. K. 1986. Parasitic weeds and their control in the Near East. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 34:8398.Google Scholar
Reinke, H., Rosenzweig, A., Claus, M., Kreidi, M., Chisholm, C., and Jensen, P. 1991. DPX-E9636, experimental sulfonylurea herbicide for potatoes. <i>In</i> Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 4:445451.Google Scholar