Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:42:36.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Spray Volume and Pressure on Postemergence Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chester G. McWhorter  and
James E. Hanks
Chester G. McWhorter
Affiliation:
Appl. Tech. Res. Unit, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
James E. Hanks
Affiliation:
Appl. Tech. Res. Unit, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fenoxaprop, fluazifop/fluazifop-P, haloxyfop, and quizalofop at 0.14 kg ai ha−1 and sethoxydim at 0.28 kg ai ha−1 were applied broadcast over-the-top in spray volumes of 94 and 374 L ha−1, each at 138 and 345 kPa, to control johnsongrass in soybeans over a 5-yr period. The two spray volumes provided equal control, but control was better when treatments were applied at 345 kPa than at 138 kPa. There were no significant interactions among herbicides, spray volumes, or spray pressures. Most of the spray was deposited on the upper surface of the plant canopy. Less than 10% of the herbicide spray applied penetrated into the canopy onto water-sensitive spray cards located 10, 20, 30, or 40 cm above the ground.

Keywords

Fenoxaprop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidfluazifop, (±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]-oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidfluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]-propanoic acidhaloxyfop, 2-[4-[[3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidquizalofop, (±)-2-[4[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)-oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onesoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Forrest’johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHAFenoxapropfluazifopfluazifop-Phaloxyfopquizalofopsethoxydimspray particledropletspray coveragesoybeanSORHA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 304 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, A. J., Chapple, A. C., and Hall, F. R. 1990. Droplet spectra for some agricultural fan nozzles, with respect to drift and biological efficiency. p. 156–169 in Bode, L. E., Hazen, J. L., and Chasin, D. G., eds. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 10th Vol. ASTM STP 1078. Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1985. Water-sensitive paper for monitoring spray distribution. Ciba-Geigy, Ltd. Publication 19374XYe, Basle, Switzerland. 16 p.Google Scholar
3. Barry, J. W., Ekblad, R. B., Markin, G. P., and Trostle, G. C. 1978. Methods for sampling and assessing deposits of insecticidal sprays released over forests. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1596. U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington. 162 p.Google Scholar
4. Bode, L. E. and Butler, B. J. 1983. Spray characteristics of rotary atomizers. p. 89–104 in Seymour, K. G., ed. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 2nd Vol. ASTM STP 795. Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
5. Bovey, R. W., Stermer, R. A., and Bouse, L. S. 1991. Spray deposition of clopyralid on honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Technol. 5:499–503.Google Scholar
6. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1990. Effect of rate, carrier volume, and surfactant on imazamethabenz efficacy. Weed Technol. 4:291–293.Google Scholar
7. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci. 31:124–130.Google Scholar
8. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 31:163–169.Google Scholar
9. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574–583.Google Scholar
10. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1987. Effects of application variables on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Technol. 1:14–17.Google Scholar
11. Chandrasena, N. R. and Sagar, G. R. 1989. Fluazifop toxicity to quackgrass (Agropyron repens) as influenced by some application factors and site of application. Weed Sci. 37:790–796.Google Scholar
12. Hall, F. R., Reed, J. P., Reichard, D. L., Riedel, R. M., and Lehtinen, J. 1990. Pesticide delivery systems: spray distribution and partitioning in plant canopies. p. 184–203 in Bode, L. E., Hazen, J. L., and Chasin, D. G., eds. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 10th Vol. ASTM STP 1078. Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
13. Harrison, S. H., Wax, L. M., and Bode, L. E. 1986. Influence of adjuvants and application variables on postemergence weed control with bentazon and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:462–466.Google Scholar
14. Jordan, T. N. 1981. Effects of diluent volumes and surfactant on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 29:79–83.Google Scholar
15. Kells, J. J. and Wanamarta, G. 1987. Effect of adjuvant and spray volume on quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with selective postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 1:129–132.Google Scholar
16. Lassiter, R. B. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1987. Carrier volume effects on the antagonism of sethoxydim by bentazon. Weed Sci. 35:541–546.Google Scholar
17. McKinlay, K. S., Ashford, R., and Ford, R. J. 1974. Effects of drop size, spray volume, and dosage on paraquat toxicity. Weed Sci. 22:31–34.Google Scholar
18. Neal, J. C., Bhowmik, P. C., and Senesac, A. F. 1990. Factors influencing fenoxaprop efficacy in cool-season turfgrass. Weed Technol. 4:272–278.Google Scholar
19. Pearson, S. L. and Bode, L. E. 1985. Effect of carrier rates and nozzle types on postemergence weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:35.Google Scholar
20. Prasad, R. 1992. Some factors affecting herbicidal activity of glyphosate in relation to adjuvants and droplet size. p. 247–257 in Bode, L. E. and Chasin, D. G., eds. Pesticide Formulation and Application Systems: 11th Vol. ASTM STP 1112. Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
21. Richard, E. P. Jr. 1991. Optimizing diluent volume improves johnsongrass control in sugarcane (Saccharaum sp.) with asulam. Weed Technol. 5:363–368.Google Scholar
22. Smeda, R. J. and Putnam, A. R. 1989. Effect of adjuvant concentration and carrier volume on large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) control with fluazifop. Weed Technol. 3:105–109.Google Scholar
23. Stahlman, P. W. and Phillips, W. M. 1979. Effects of water quality and spray volume on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 27:38–41.Google Scholar
24. Tworkowski, T. J., Young, R. S., and Sterrett, J. P. 1988. Control of Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia): Effects of carrier volume on toxicity and distribution of triclopyr. Weed Technol. 2:31–35.Google Scholar
25. Young, B. W. 1990. Droplet dynamics in hydraulic nozzle spray clouds. p. 142–169 in Bode, L. E., Hazen, J. L., and Chasin, D. G., eds. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 10th Vol. ASTM STP 1078. Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar