Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:44:34.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DPX-V9360 Efficacy with Adjuvants and Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John D. Nalewaja ,
Zenon Woznica  and
Frank A. Manthey
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Sci. Dep. N.D. State Univ.
Zenon Woznica
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Sci. Dep. N.D. State Univ.
Frank A. Manthey
Affiliation:
Crop and Weed Sci. Dep. N.D. State Univ.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adjuvants enhanced DPX-V9360 control of green foxtail in the greenhouse and field as follows: methylated sunflower oil > petroleum oil > nonionic surfactant WK > nonionic surfactant X-77. DPX-V9360 applied at rates that controlled weeds did not injure corn. Green foxtail control with DPX-V9360 decreased as the amount of simulated rainfall after application increased from 0 to 4 mm and control increased as a 2 mm simulated rainfall was delayed up to 24 h. The influence of simulated rainfall differed with adjuvants, but adjuvants did not overcome the lower green foxtail control with simulated rainfall. DPX-V9360 was more phytotoxic to green foxtail and redroot pigweed at 95 to 100% than 45 to 50% relative humidity and at 20 or 30 C than 10 C after treatment.

Keywords

DPX-V9360, 2-(((((4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)aminocarbonyl))-aminosulfonyl))-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamide monohydratecorn, Zea mays L.green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. ♯ SETVI, redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. ♯ AMAREPetroleum oiladjuvantnonionic surfactantmethylated seed oilrelative humiditytemperatureCHEALKCHSCSETLU
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 92 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buhler, D. D., and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574–583.Google Scholar
2. Feist, D. A. 1988. Adjuvants and grass control herbicides applied with DPX-M6316. M.S. Thesis, N.D. State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105.Google Scholar
3. Green, J. M., Berengut, D., King, M. G., and Brown, P. A. 1989. Influence of nonionic surfactant properties on DPX-M6316 performance on corn and soybeans. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., p. 23.Google Scholar
4. Jones, G. E., and Anderson, G. W. 1964. Atrazine as a foliar application in an oil water emulsion. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 20:27–29.Google Scholar
5. McWhorter, C. G., and Jordan, T. N. 1976. Effect of adjuvants and environment on the toxicity of dalapon to johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 24: 257–260.Google Scholar
6. Miller, S. D., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1973. Effect of additives upon phenmedipham for weed control in sugarbeet. Weed Sci. 21:67–70.Google Scholar
7. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., and Pudelka, J. 1978. Barban-aqueous nitrogen combinations for wild oat (Avena fatua) control. Weed Sci. 26: 344–348.Google Scholar
8. Nalewaja, J. D., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1988. Thiameturon phytotoxicity to kochia. Weed Sci. 36:296–300.Google Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D., and Woznica, Z. 1985. Environment and chlorsulfuron phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 33:395–399.Google Scholar
10. Willingham, G. L., and Graham, L. 1988. Influence of environment and adjuvants on the foliar penetration of acifluorfen in velvetleaf: An analysis using the factorial design. Weed Sci. 36:824–829.Google Scholar
11. Wills, G. D., and Jordan, P. M. 1981. Factors affecting toxicity and translocation of metriflufen in cotton. Weed Sci. 29:308–313.Google Scholar