Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:28:22.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Desiccant Activity of Short Chain Fatty Acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert Coleman  and
Donald Penner
Robert Coleman
Affiliation:
Summerdale, Inc., Okemos, MI 48864
Donald Penner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an effort to find safe natural products to function in traditional agricultural chemical roles, short-chain fatty acids were evaluated as desiccants for dry beans. Desiccation was evaluated in greenhouse studies on three dry bean cultivars: ‘Montcalm’ kidney, ‘Midnight’ black turtle, and ‘Vista’ navy bean. Caprylic (C8) and pelargonic acid (C9) were the most effective in the C2 through C10 range. Effective emulsifiers with C8 were Henkel Emsorb 6900 and Henkel Emsorb 6915. Organosilicone, saponified, methylated, and ethylated seed oil activator adjuvants enhanced the efficacy of the caprylic acid. C8 was also phytotoxic to velvetleaf, giant foxtail, and common lambsquarters; esters of C6, C8, and C10 fatty acids were comparatively less effective than C8.

Keywords

Common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. #SETFAvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medic. #ABUTHdry beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L.Caprylic acidadjuvantsemulsifiersAMS, ammonium sulfateC2 to C10, carbon chains of 2 through 10DAT, days after treatmentHFCS, high-fructose corn syrup
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 410 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bennett, A. C. and Shaw, D. R. 2000. Effect of preharvest desiccants on group IV Glycine max seed viability. Weed Sci. 48:426–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonde, R. and Schultz, E. S. 1945. The control of potato late-blight tuber rot. Am Potato J. 22:163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currier, H. B. and Peoples, S. A. 1954. Phytotoxicity of hydrocarbons. Hilgardia 23:155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutch, D. R. 1980. Spray additives and chemical harvest aids for navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and potato (Solanum tuberosum) M.S. Thesis. Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI. 52 p.Google Scholar
Penner, D. 1999. Maximizing herbicide performance with adjuvants. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:108.Google Scholar
Renner, K. W. 1991. Chemical vine desiccation of two potato cultivars. Am. Potato J. 68:479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, G. E., Rzewnicki, P., and Penner, D. 1979. Computerization of herbicide use surveys. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 133.Google Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America. Herbicide Handbook Committee. 1998. Herbicide Handbook Supplement to 7th ed. Champaign, IL: WSSA. 104 p.Google Scholar