Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T05:18:35.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost Effective Vegetation Management on a Recently Cleared Electric Transmission Line Right-of-way

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Christopher A. Nowak ,
Lawrence P. Abrahamson ,
Edward F. Neuhauser ,
Curtis G. Foreback ,
H. Dale Freed ,
Scott B. Shaheen  and
Craig H. Stevens
Christopher A. Nowak
Affiliation:
Facul. For., State Univ. N.Y., Coll. Environ. Sci. For., 1 Forestry Dr., Syracuse, NY 13210
Lawrence P. Abrahamson
Affiliation:
Facul. For., State Univ. N.Y., Coll. Environ. Sci. For., 1 Forestry Dr., Syracuse, NY 13210
Edward F. Neuhauser
Affiliation:
Facul. For., State Univ. N.Y., Coll. Environ. Sci. For., 1 Forestry Dr., Syracuse, NY 13210
Curtis G. Foreback
Affiliation:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 300 Erie Blvd. W., Syracuse, NY 13202
H. Dale Freed
Affiliation:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 300 Erie Blvd. W., Syracuse, NY 13202
Scott B. Shaheen
Affiliation:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 300 Erie Blvd. W., Syracuse, NY 13202
Craig H. Stevens
Affiliation:
Tree Preservation Co., Inc., 566 North State Rd., Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several application modes and methods (schemes) of using herbicides are available to control undesirable vegetation on electric transmission line rights-of-way (ROW). Preferential use of a management scheme can be based on its cost effectiveness, i.e., degree of vegetation control and treatment cost. A treatment that increases/maintains desirable plants, decreases/maintains undesirable plants, and has relatively low cost, can be considered cost effective. Three common herbicides, 2,4-D, picloram and triclopyr, were applied in the field to test treatment mode (selective and nonselective) and method (cut stump, basal, and stem-foliar) effects on cost effectiveness during initial clearing and first and second conversion cycles on one electric transmission line ROW in Upstate New York. Clear or selective cutting with no herbicide was most cost effective during initial clearing. Nonselective and selective stem-foliar schemes were most cost effective during the first and second conversion cycles, respectively.

Keywords

2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidpicloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidtriclopyr, [(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acidBasalstem-foliarcut stumppicloramtriclopyr2,4-D
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 828 - 837
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bramble, W. C. and Byrnes, W. R. 1983. Thirty years of research on development of plant cover on an electric transmission right-of-way. J. Aboric. 9:67–74.Google Scholar
2. Cochran, W. G. 1957. Analysis of covariance: Its nature and uses. Biometrics 3:261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. ESEERCO. 1984. Cost comparison of ROW treatment methods. Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation, Research Report EP 80-5, Final Report, Schenectady, NY.Google Scholar
4. ESEERCO. 1985. Long-term right-of-way effectiveness. Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation, Research Report EP 83-15, Final Report, Schenectady, NY.Google Scholar
5. ESEERCO. 1987. Right-of-way treatment cycles. Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation, Research Report EP 84-26, Final Report, Schenectady, NY.Google Scholar
6. Huberty, C. 1987. On statistical testing. Educ. Res. 16:4–9.Google Scholar
7. Labovitz, S. 1968. Criteria for selecting a significance level: A note on the sacredness of. 05. Am. Sociol. 3:220–222.Google Scholar
8. McLoughlin, K. and Johnston, P. A. 1987. Right-of-way treatment cycles. p. 121–122 in Byrnes, W. R. and Holt, H. A., eds., Proc. Fourth Symp. Environ. Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
9. Milliken, G. A. and Johnson, D. E. 1984. Analysis of Messy Data. Vol. 1: Designed Experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.Google Scholar
10. NYS Public Service Commission. 1980. The role of herbicides in managing vegetation on electric transmission rights-of-way, Opinion No. 80–15, Case 27605. New York State Public Service Commission, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
11. NYS Public Service Commission. 1980. Opinion and order adopting regulations for approval of right-of-way aerial spray plans, long-range management plans, annual maintenance programs, and discussion of herbicide applicator training program and voluntary notification system, Opinion No. 80–40, Case 27605. New York State Public Service Commission, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
12. SAS Institute, Inc. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. 956 p.Google Scholar
13. Warren, W. G. 1986. On the presentation of statistical analysis: reason or ritual. Can. J. For. Res. 16:1185–1191.Google Scholar