Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:22:40.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Volunteer Corn with the AAD-1 (aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-1) Transgene in Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nader Soltani ,
Christy Shropshire  and
Peter H. Sikkema
Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Department of plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street E., Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada N0P 2C0
Christy Shropshire
Affiliation:
Department of plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street E., Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada N0P 2C0
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Department of plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street E., Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada N0P 2C0
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Volunteer Enlist corn with the AAD-1 (aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-1) transgene can become a problem when glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean follows Enlist corn in the rotation. Field trials were conducted at Ridgetown, Ontario in 2013 and 2014 to evaluate the control of volunteer Enlist corn in GR soybean. Glyphosate plus clethodim at 30 g ai ha−1 provided 75 to 92% control of volunteer Enlist corn at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment application (WAT) and reduced volunteer Enlist corn density and dry weight 95 to 97%. Glyphosate plus clethodim at 60 g ai ha−1 provided 84 to 98% control of volunteer Enlist corn at 1, 2, 4, and 8 WAT and reduced volunteer Enlist corn density and dry weight 97 to 99%. Glyphosate plus sethoxydim at 150 g ai ha−1 provided 66 to 86% control of volunteer Enlist corn at 1, 2, 4, and 8 WAT and reduced volunteer Enlist corn density and dry weight 91 to 97%. Glyphosate plus sethoxydim at 300 g ha−1 provided 84 to 96% control of volunteer Enlist corn at 1, 2, 4, and 8 WAT and reduced volunteer Enlist corn density and dry weight 96 to 98%. Glyphosate plus fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, and quizalofop-p-ethyl applied POST provided 0 to 9% control of volunteer Enlist corn at 1, 2, 4, and 8 WAT and reduced volunteer Enlist corn density and dry weight 18 to 44%. Soybean yields closely reflected the level of volunteer Enlist corn control. Based on these results, the cyclohexanedione herbicides, clethodim and sethoxydim, provide adequate control of volunteer Enlist corn in GR soybean. In contrast, the aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl do not provide control of volunteer Enlist corn in GR soybean.

El maíz Enlist voluntario con el transgen AAD-1 (aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-1) puede convertirse en un problema cuando soja resistente a glyphosate (GR) se siembra luego de maíz Enlist en la rotación de cultivos. En 2013 y 2014 en Ridgetown, Ontario, se realizaron estudios de campo para evaluar el control de maíz Enlist voluntario en soja GR. Glyphosate más clethodim a 30 g ai ha−1 brindó 75 a 92% de control de maíz Enlist voluntario a 1, 2, 4, y 8 semanas después de la aplicación del tratamiento (WAT) y redujo la densidad y el peso seco del maíz Enlist voluntario en 95 a 97%. Glyphosate más clethodim a 60 g ai ha−1 brindó 84 a 98% de control de maíz Enlist voluntario a 1, 2, 4, y 8 WAT y redujo la densidad y el peso seco del maíz Enlist voluntario en 97 a 99%. Glyphosate más sethoxydim a 150 g ai ha−1 brindó 66 a 86% de control de maíz Enlist voluntario a 1, 2, 4, y 8 WAT y redujo la densidad y el peso seco del maíz Enlist voluntario en 91 a 97%. Glyphosate más sethoxydim a 300 g ai ha−1 brindó 84 a 96% de control de maíz Enlist voluntario a 1, 2, 4, y 8 WAT y redujo la densidad y el peso seco del maíz Enlist voluntario en 96 a 98%. Glyphosate más fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, y quizalofop-p-ethyl aplicados POST brindaron 0 a 9% de control de maíz Enlist voluntario a 1, 2, 4, y 8 WAT y redujeron la densidad y el peso seco del maíz Enlist voluntario en 18 a 44%. Los rendimientos de la soja reflejaron estrechamente el nivel de control de maíz Enlist voluntario. Con base en estos resultados, los herbicidas cyclohexanedione, clethodim y sethoxydim, brindan un control adecuado del maíz Enlist voluntario en soja GR. En cambio, los herbicidas aryloxyphenoxypropionate, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, y quizalofop-p-ethyl no brindan control de maíz Enlist voluntario en soja GR.

Keywords

ACCase, acetyl-CoA carboxylaseAAD-1, aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-1 transgenearyloxyphenoxypropionateclethodimcyclohexanedionefenoxaprop-p-ethylfluazifop-p-butylquizalofop-p-ethylsethoxydimcorn, Zea mays L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Densitydry weightEnlist cornglyphosate-resistantplant standsoybeanvolunteer cornyield
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 374 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, RN (1976) Control of volunteer corn and giant foxtail in soybeans. Weed Sci 24:253–256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, RN, Geadelmann, JL (1982) The effect of parentage on the control of volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 30:127–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, RN, Ford, JF, Lueschen, WE (1982) Controlling volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans (Glycine max) with diclofop and glyphosate. Weed Sci 30:132–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, TH, Stoller, EW (1988) Volunteer corn (Zea mays) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 36:159–166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, TH, Stoller, EW, Bode, LE (1992) Quizalofop and sthoxydim activity as affected by adjuvants and ammonium fertilizers. Weed Sci 40:12–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, JD, Gronwald, JW, Somers, DA, Gengenbach, BG, Wyse, DL (1989) Inhibition of corn Acetyl-CoA carboxylase by cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides. Pest Biochem Physiol 34:76–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deen, WA, Hamill, A, Shropshire, C, Soltani, N, Sikkema, PH (2006) Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays) in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 20:261–266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focke, M, Lichtenthaler, HK (1987) Inhibition of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase of barley chloroplasts by cycloxydim and sethoxydim. Z. Naturforsch. 42c:1361–1363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, GR (1974) Well-planned program necessary for soybean weed control. Weeds Today 5(2):6–7 Google Scholar
[OMAFRA] Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2014) Guide to weed control. Publication. 75. Toronto, ON. 425 p.Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Herbicide Handbook, 10th Edition. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 513 pGoogle Scholar
Sikkema, PH, Soltani, N (2007) Herbicide-resistant crops in eastern Canada. Pages 3–13 in Gulden, RH and Swanton, CJ, eds. The first decade of herbicide-resistant crops in Canada. Topics in Canadian Weed Science, Sainte Anne de Bellevue, Quebec; Canadian Weed Science Society—Societe Canadienne de malherbologie. Vol. 4 Google Scholar
Sikkema, PH, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Soltani, N (2013) Discovery of glyphosate-resistant weeds in Ontario, Canada—distribution plus control. Perth, Australia Global Herbicide Resistant Challenge Conference Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2006) Control of volunteer glyphosate-tolerant maize (Zea mays) in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Crop Prot 25:178–181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, L, Potterand, B, Gunsolus, J (2013) Control volunteer corn for yield protection and corn rootworm management. University of Minnesota Extension. Pp. 1–4. http://www.extension.umn.edu/agriculture/corn/pest-management/control-volunteer-corn-for-yield-protection-and-corn-rootworm-management/docs/UM-Extension-VolunteerCornFactSheet-2013.pdf. Accessed April 9, 2015Google Scholar
Wright, TR, Shan, G, Walsh, TA, Lira, JM, Cui, C, Song, P, Zhuang, M, Arnold, NL, Lin, G, Yau, K, Russell, SM, Cicchillo, RM, Peterson, MA, Simpson, DM, Zhou, N, Ponsamuel, J, Zhang, Z (2010) Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes. PNAS USA 107:20240–20245 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, B, Hart, G (1997) Control of volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn (Zea mays) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 11:649–655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollinger, RK, Ries, JL (2004) Glyphosate-resistant volunteer soybean control. 2004 NCWSS Research Report 61:80 Google Scholar