Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:16:26.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Ivyleaf Morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) by Combinations of Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert J. Thullen  and
Paul E. Keeley
Robert J. Thullen
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., Cotton Res. Stn., 17053 Shafter Ave., Shafter, CA 93262
Paul E. Keeley
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., Cotton Res. Stn., 17053 Shafter Ave., Shafter, CA 93262
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various combinations of methods were evaluated for the control of ivyleaf morningglory growing in cotton. The combinations included chemicals incorporated to two depths or tanked-mixed as postemergence treatments and cultural methods that included in-row cultivation and hand weeding. The most effective combinations of methods included a herbicide such as cyanazine or prometryn in some treatments resulting in reduced ivyleaf morningglory population and improved cotton yields. Cultural methods without chemical assistance gave little or no control of ivyleaf morningglory based on weed populations and cotton yield. Statistically the best combinations had lint yields equal to the weed-free treatment, but the yields were reduced from 114 to 372 kg/ha. Also, most combination treatments had enough plant debris in the lint to reduce fiber grade.

Keywords

Cyanazine, 2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrilemethazole, 2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazolidine-3,5-dioneprometryn, N,N-bis(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamineDSMA, disodium salt of MAA (methylarsonic acid)MSMA, monosodium salt of MAAivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq., ♯ IPOHEcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., ‘GC-510.’Incorporationpostemergentcultivationhand weedinglint yieldmicronairestaple lengthfiber gradepercent trashcyanazineDSMAmethazoleMSMAprometrynIPOHE
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 772 - 776
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Keeley, P. E., Miller, J. H., Kempen, H. M., and Hoover, M. 1975. Survey of weeds on cotton farms in the San Joaquin Valley. Proc. Calif. Weed Conf. 27:39–47.Google Scholar
2. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1991. Biology and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 5:713–727.Google Scholar
3. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1993. Weeds in cotton: Their biology, ecology, and control. U.S. Dep. Agric. ARS. Tech. Bull. #1810.Google Scholar
4. Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., and Carter, C. H. 1986. Influence of planting date on growth of ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 34:906–910.Google Scholar
5. Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., Miller, J. H., and Carter, C. H. 1983. Comparison of six cropping systems for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control. Weed Sci. 31:63–67.Google Scholar
6. Miller, J. H. and Carter, L. M. 1968. Incorporation of herbicides in moist soil by powered rotary devices. Crop Res., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., ARS. 34-100.Google Scholar
7. Patterson, M. 1989. Report of the 1988 cotton weed loss committee. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Conf. Cotton Weed Sci. Conf. 13:389–391.Google Scholar