Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:13:18.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chlormequat Chloride (CCC) Pretreatments May Enhance Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) Control with Sethoxydim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Bag Service 5000, Lacombe, AB, Canada T0C 1S0
John S. Taylor
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Bag Service 5000, Lacombe, AB, Canada T0C 1S0

Abstract

Laboratory, greenhouse, and field experiments were conducted at the Lacombe Research Station to determine if CCC, ethephon, or CCC/ethephon had direct activity on quackgrass rhizome buds, and to determine if foliar applications of CCC/ethephon could predispose quackgrass to more effective control with sethoxydim. CCC, ethephon, and CCC/ethephon had growth regulating effects on the axillary buds and the apex of detached quackgrass rhizomes. CCC increased rhizome bud sprouting on rhizomes with the apex excised, but not on rhizomes with an intact apex. Ethephon or CCC/ethephon inhibited bud sprouting on rhizomes with an intact or excised apex. CCC/ethephon, but not CCC or ethephon alone, increased rhizome elongation on rhizomes with intact apices. In the greenhouse, pretreatments of CCC/ethephon increased sethoxydim activity on quackgrass rhizome buds and caused lower shoot emergence from one-bud rhizome segments. Results of field experiments were less consistent than those in the greenhouse. However, sometimes CCC or CCC/ethephon pretreatments resulted in increased quackgrass control in the field with sethoxydim.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alberta Agriculture. 1992. Crop Protection with Chemicals. Agdex 606-1, Edmonton, Alberta. 256 p.Google Scholar
2. Baradari, M. R., Haderlie, L. C., and Wilson, R. G. 1980. Chlorflurenol effects on absorption and translocation of dicamba in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 28:197200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Binning, L. K., Penner, D., and Meggitt, W. F. 1971. The effect of 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid on dicamba translocation in wild garlic. Weed Sci. 19:7375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Carson, A. G. and Bandeen, J. D. 1975. Influence of ethephon on absorption and translocation of herbicides in Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:795800.Google Scholar
5. Caseley, J. 1972. The use of plant growth regulators in the control of Agropyron repens . Proc. 11th Br. Weed Control Conf. p. 736743.Google Scholar
6. Chandrasena, N. R. and Sagar, G. R. 1986. Uptake and translocation of 14C-fluazifop by quackgrass (Agropyron repens) . Weed Sci. 34:676684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Claus, J. S. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Devine, M. D., Bandeen, J. D., and McKersie, B. D. 1983. Temperature effects on glyphosate absorption, translocation, and distribution in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 31:461464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Dicks, J. W. 1980. Mode of action of growth retardants. p. 114 in Clifford, D. R. and Lenton, J. R., eds. Recent Developments in the Use of Plant Growth Retardants, Monogr. No. 4, Proc. Br. Plant Growth Regul. Group. Wessex Press, Wantage.Google Scholar
10. Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Effects of phenology on translocation patterns of several herbicides in quackgrass, Agropyron repens . Weed Sci. 36:463472.Google Scholar
11. Harker, K. N. and Dekker, J. 1988. Temperature effects on translocation patterns of several herbicides within quackgrass (Agropyron repens) . Weed Sci. 36:545552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hicks, C. P. and Jordan, T. N. 1984. Response of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), quackgrass (Agropyron repens), and wirestem muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) to postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:835841.Google Scholar
13. Humphries, E. C., Welbank, P. J., and Witts, K. J. 1965. Effect of CCC (chlorocholine chloride) on growth and yield of spring wheat in the field. Ann. Appl. Biol. 56:351361.Google Scholar
14. Isbell, V. R. and Morgan, P. W. 1982. Manipulation of apical dominance in sorghum with growth regulators. Crop Sci. 22:3035.Google Scholar
15. Ivany, J. A. 1988. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with fluazifop. Weed Sci. 36:363366.Google Scholar
16. Johnson, B. G. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1962. The natural dormancy of vegetative buds on the rhizomes of quackgrass. Weeds 10:5357.Google Scholar
17. Jung, J. and Rademacher, W. 1984. Plant growth regulating chemicals—cereal grains. p. 253271 in Nickell, L. G., ed. Plant Growth Regulating Chemicals, Vol. I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
13. Leakey, R. R. B. and Chancellor, R. J. 1975. Parental factors in dominance of lateral buds on rhizomes of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Planta 123:267274.Google Scholar
19. Ma, B. L. and Smith, D. L. 1991. Apical development of spring barley in relation to chlormequat and ethephon. Agron. J. 83:270274.Google Scholar
20. McIntyre, G. I. 1969. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. Evidence of competition for carbohydrate as a factor in the mechanism of inhibition. Can. J. Bot. 47:11891197.Google Scholar
21. McIntyre, G. I. 1970. Studies on bud development in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. 1. The influence of temperature, light intensity, and bud position on the pattern of development. Can. J. Bot. 48:19031909.Google Scholar
22. McIntyre, G. I. 1971. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. Some factors affecting the degree of dominance in isolated rhizomes. Can. J. Bot. 49:99109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Morrison, I. N., Wilcox, D., Chikoye, D., and Nawolsky, K. 1990. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.) interference in spring wheat and flax. Proc. Quackgrass Symp., Oct. 24–25, London, Ontario, p. 7584.Google Scholar
24. O'Donovan, J. T. 1991. Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) interference in canola (Brassica campestris) . Weed Sci. 39:397401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Regimbal, G. A. and Martin, A. R. 1985. The influence of growth regulators and nitrogen on leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control with picloram. Weed Sci. 33:109113.Google Scholar
26. Rioux, R. 1982. Measuring quackgrass interference in barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Robertson, J. M., Taylor, J. S., Harker, K. N., Pocock, R. N., and Yeung, E. 1989. Apical dominance in the rhizome of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens): Inhibitory effect of the scale leaves. Weed Sci. 37:680687.Google Scholar
28. SAS Institute. 1985. The CATMOD procedure. p. 171253 in SAS® User's Guide: Statistics, ver. 5 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
29. Sikkema, P. H. and Dekker, J. 1987. Use of infrared thermometry in determining critical stress periods induced by quackgrass (Agropyron repens) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 35:784791.Google Scholar
30. Stoltenberg, D. E. and Wyse, D. L. 1986. Regrowth of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) following postemergence applications of haloxyfop and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:664668.Google Scholar
31. Teo, C. K. H. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1973. Cytokinin-enhanced sprouting of purple nutsedge as a basis for control. Weed Res. 13: 118121.Google Scholar
32. Werner, P. A. and Rioux, R. 1977. The biology of Canadian weeds. 24. Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:905919.Google Scholar
33. Yang, S. F. 1969. Ethylene evolution from 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid. Plant Physiol. 44: 12031204.Google Scholar
34. Young, F. L. and Wyse, D. L. 1980. Control of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) in soybeans (Glycine max) with HOE 29152. Weed Sci. 28:493498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1984. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) interference on corn (Zea mays) . Weed Sci. 32:226234.Google Scholar