Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:04:44.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Control with Herbicides Applied to Mature Seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Amanda E. Stone ,
Thomas F. Peeper  and
John B. Solie
Amanda E. Stone
Affiliation:
Weed Science, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Weed Science, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
John B. Solie*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Engineering, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several herbicides were evaluated as seed-applied treatments to determine the feasibility of controlling cheat by applying herbicide directly onto the cheat seeds during the wheat harvesting process and returning the treated seeds to the field. Seed-applied trifluralin reduced cheat emergence 80% in exploratory evaluations. In herbicide-seed mixing time and spray volume experiments, short mixing times were adequate, and spray volumes from 113 to 227 ml/kg seeds did not affect results. Herbicides applied with a sprayer-equipped auger reduced cheat emergence >90% and were as effective as herbicides applied with a rotary drum seed-treater. Increasing spray volume increased the efficacy of auger-applied treatments. Adjuvants did not improve the efficacy of seed-applied trifluralin.

Keywords

Trifluralincheat, Bromus secalinus L. #3 BROSEwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Seed treatmentsgrain harvesting
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 382 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ballare, C. L., Scopel, A. L., Ghersa, G. M., and Sanchez, R. A. 1987. The demography of Datura ferox (L.) in soybean crops. Weed Res. 27: 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, B. 1996. Crop Review. Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics 1996. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Department of Agriculture. pp. 12–49.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. H. 1987. Applying EPTC and seedling alfalfa (Medicago sativa) simultaneously. Weed Sci. 35: 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, H. W., Stone, M. L., Newton, K. A., and Swift, V. D. 1985. Strip Control of Volunteer Wheat and Other Weeds in Conservation Tillage. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineering Paper 85-1518. 16 p.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. W. 1998. Economics of Alternative Wheat Harvesting Methods for Weed-Infested Oklahoma Fields. . Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK. 152 p.Google Scholar
Hulbert, L. C. 1955. Ecological studies of Bromus tectorum and other annual bromegrasses. Ecol. Monogr. 25: 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justice, G. G., Peeper, T. F., Solie, J. B., and Epplin, F. M. 1993. Net returns from cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 7: 459–464.Google Scholar
Koscelny, J. A. and Peeper, T. F. 1997. Evaluation of registered herbicides for cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 11: 30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, B. D. and Ghersa, C. 1992. The influence of weed seed dispersion versus the effect of competition on crop yield. Weed Technol. 6: 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olfert, M. R., Stumborg, M., Craig, W., and Schoney, R. A. 1991. The economics of collecting chaff. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 6: 154–160.Google Scholar
Pollard, F., Richardson, W. G., and West, T. M. 1984. Control of Bromus species in winter barley in England using EPTC. Crop Prot. 3: 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratliff, R. L. and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Bromus control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with the ethylthio analog of metribuzin. Weed Technol. 1: 235–241.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 846 p.Google Scholar
Slagell-Gossen, R. R., Tyrl, R. J., Hauhouot, M., Peeper, T. F., Claypool, P. L., and Solie, J. B. 1998. Effects of mechanical damage on cheat (Bromus secalinus) caryopsis anatomy and germination. Weed Sci. 46: 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thill, D. C. and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1997. The nature and consequence of weed spread in cropping systems. Weed Sci. 45: 340–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar