Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:26:18.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in Herbicide Use Patterns and Production Practices Resulting from Glyphosate-Resistant Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bryan G. Young
Bryan G. Young*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, 1205 Lincoln Drive, MC-4415, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent shifts in herbicide use patterns can be attributed to rapid, large-scale adoption of glyphosate-resistant soybean and cotton. A dramatic increase in glyphosate use is the most obvious change associated with the adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops. Consequently, the diversity of herbicides used for weed management in these crops has declined, particularly in soybean. To date, the availability of glyphosate-resistant corn has limited the use of glyphosate in corn. While exploiting the benefits of glyphosate-resistant crops, many growers have abandoned the principles of sound weed and herbicide-resistance management. Instead of incorporating glyphosate into a resistance management strategy utilizing multiple herbicide sites of action, many growers rely exclusively upon glyphosate for weed control. Although it is difficult to establish a clear relationship between the adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops and changes in other crop production practices, the increase in no-till and strip-till production of cotton and soybean between 1995 and 2002 may have been facilitated by glyphosate-resistant crops.

Keywords

Glyphosatecorn, Zea mays L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.soybean, Glycine max L.Application timingherbicide-resistance managementmode of actionsite of actiontank mixturestillageweed management strategies
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 301 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2004. Roundup WeatherMax product label. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto. 19 p.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. W., Hagood, E. S., and Davis, P. H. 2004. Trumpetcreeper (Campsis radicans) control in double-crop glyphosate-resistant soybean with glyphosate and conventional herbicide systems. Weed Technol. 18:298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1992. Rationale for developing herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 6:621–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CTIC] Conservation Technology Information Center. 2004. Conservation Tillage and Plant Biotechnology: How New Technologies Can Improve the Environment by Reducing the Need to Plow. Web page: http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/Biotech.html. Accessed: May 25, 2004.Google Scholar
[CTIC] Conservation Technology Information Center. 2004. National Crop Residue Management Survey Data. Web page: http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/Core4/CT/CT.html. Accessed: May 23, 2004.Google Scholar
Dalley, C. D., Kells, J. J., and Renner, K. A. 2004. Effect of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) yields. Weed Technol. 18:165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, S. A., Loux, M. M., and Cardina, J. et al. 2003. Effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant corn: results of a 2-yr multistate study. Weed Technol. 17:821–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgenfeld, K. L., Martin, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., and Mason, S. C. 2004. Weed management in a glyphosate-resistant soybean system: weed species shifts. Weed Technol. 18:284–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Bradley, P. R., Hart, S. E., Buesinger, M. L., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, C. L., Mueller, T. C., Hayes, R. M., and Wilkerson, J. B. 2004. Response of selected horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) populations to glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:879–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Ghersa, M. A., Worster, C. A., and Radosevich, S. R. 2003. Concerns a weed scientist might have about herbicide-tolerant crops: a revisitation. Weed Technol. 17:202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Ghersa, C. M., and Comstock, G. 1992. Concerns a weed scientist might have about herbicide tolerant crops. Weed Technol. 6:635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Whiting, K. 2000. Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-tolerant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems. Weed Technol. 14:204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoup, D. E. and Al-Khatib, K. 2004. Control of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor–resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in corn and soybean. Weed Technol. 18:332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeda, R. J., Snipes, C. E., and Barrentine, W. L. 1997. Identification of graminicide-resistant johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 45:132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 2004. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Agricultural Chemical Use Database: Web page: http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/app_useage.cfm. Accessed: May 23, 2004.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci. 49:703–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar