Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:00:58.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case History for Weed Competition/Population Ecology: Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Maurizio Sattin
Affiliation:
Centro per lo Studio dei Diserbanti del C.N.R., Via Gradenigo 6, 35131 Padova, Italy
Giuseppe Zanin
Affiliation:
Centro per lo Studio dei Diserbanti del C.N.R., Via Gradenigo 6, 35131 Padova, Italy
Antonio Berti
Affiliation:
Univ. Padua, Via Gradenigo 6, 35131 Padova, Italy

Abstract

According to Grime's model, velvetleaf can be classified as a competitive-ruderal species. Its biological and ecological characteristics make it particularly competitive and persistent in cultivated fields. Herbicide control is difficult and, once established, it is almost impossible to avoid seed production. The economic threshold, on a single year basis, varies between 0.3 and 1.7 plants m–2. When the competitive relationships and their effects are evaluated, it is very difficult to apply a weed management system based on a single-season threshold. When one considers the agronomic implications of the ecological characteristics of velvetleaf over a longer period, it can be concluded that the use of a single-season economic threshold is probably not the best management strategy.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akey, W. C., Jurik, T. W., and Dekker, J. 1990. Competition for light between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Res. 30:403411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Anguillara, M. L. 1561. Semplici dell'eccellente M. Luigi Anguillara, Liquali in piu Pareri à diuersi nobili huomini scritti appaiono, et Nuovamente da M. Giovanni Marinello mandati in luce. Vincenzo Valgrisi, Venice.Google Scholar
3. Auld, B. A., and Tisdell, C. A. 1988. Influence of spatial distribution of weeds on crop yield loss. Plant Prot. Q. 3:81.Google Scholar
4. Baskin, J. M., and Baskin, C. C. 1989. Physiology of dormancy and germination in relation to seed bank ecology. p. 5366 in Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T., Simpson, R. L., eds. Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press Inc., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Berti, A., Sattin, M., and Zanin, G. 1990. Soybean — Amaranthus cruentus L.: effects of the period and duration of competition. Proc. 1st Congr. Eur. Soc. Agron. (ESA), Paris, 5–7 Dec. 1990. Eur. Soc. Agron., Session 5, P01.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., Evetts, L. L., and Mumm, R. F. 1981. Germination of exhumed weed seed in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 29:577586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cantele, A., Zanin, G., and Zuin, M. C. 1987. Abutilon theophrasti Medicus: I. Dinamica e persistenza dei semi nel terreno. Riv. Agron. 1:5458.Google Scholar
8. Cantele, A., Zanin, G., and Zuin, M. C. 1987. Abutilon theophrasti Medicus: II. Scalarità d'emergenza dei semi nel terreno. Riv. Agron. 3:224228.Google Scholar
9. Cousens, R. 1985. An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 105:513521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Cousens, R. 1987. Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Prot. Q. 2:1320.Google Scholar
11. Cousens, R., Brain, P., O'Donovan, J. T., and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35:720725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Dafni, A., and Heller, D. 1980. The threat posed by alien weeds in Israel. Weed Res. 20:277283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Dekker, J., and Meggitt, W. F. 1983. Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) II. Population dynamics. Weed Res. 23:103107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Dent, J. B., Fawcett, R. H., and Thornton, P. K. 1989. Economics of crop protection in Europe with reference to weed control. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf., Weeds. p. 917926.Google Scholar
15. Evetts, L. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1973. Early root and shoot development of nine plant species. Weed Sci. 21:289291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Gilmore, E. C. Jr., and Rogers, J. S. 1958. Heat units as a method of measuring maturity in corn. Agron. J. 50:611615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Grilli, M. 1969. Abutilon avicennae infestante del mais in Italia. Maydica. XIV:107116.Google Scholar
18. Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. p. 5758.Google Scholar
19. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press Inc., London.Google Scholar
20. Jordan, J. L. 1982. Reproductive parameters of Pennsylvania smartweed and velvetleaf as affected by maize competition. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. p. 307.Google Scholar
21. Kremer, R. J., Hughes, L. B. Jr., and Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Examination of microorganisms and deterioration resistance mechanisms associated with velvetleaf seed. Agron. J. 76:745749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Kremer, R. J. 1986. Antimicrobial activity of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Weed Sci. 34:617622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Lueschen, W. E., and Andersen, R. N. 1980. Longevity of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds in soil under agricultural practices. Weed Sci. 28:341346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Marshall, E.J.P. 1988. Field scale estimates of grass weed populations in arable land. Weed Res. 28:191198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Michael, J. L., Taylor, S. E., and Fawcett, R. S. 1982. Effects of soil temperature on the growth of giant foxtail and velvetleaf. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 37:5152.Google Scholar
26. Munerati, D., and Zapparoli, T. V. 1910. L'influenza dell'umidità e della siccità sulla germinazione dei semi delle piante spontanee. p. 493508 in Istituto Sperimentale per le colture industriali di Bologna, ed. Sulla barbabietola da zucchero. Vol. 1. Grafiche Erretredici, Padova, 1979.Google Scholar
27. Norris, R. F. 1984. Weed thresholds in relation to long-term population dynamics. Proc. West Soc. Weed Sci. 37:3843.Google Scholar
28. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Parrish, J.A.D., and Bazzaz, F. A. 1976. Underground niche separation in successional plants. Ecology 57:12811288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Patterson, D. T. 1985. Comparative ecophysiology of weeds and crops. p. 101129 in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Vol. I, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
31. Roeth, F. 1987. Velvetleaf: coming on strong. Crops and Soils Mag. 6:1011.Google Scholar
32. Ross, M. A., and Harper, J. L. 1972. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J. Ecol. 60:7788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1973. Periodicity of germination and emergence of some annual weeds. Weed Sci. 21:574580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Toole, E. H., and Brown, E. 1946. Final results of the Duvel buried seed experiment. J. Agric. Res. 72:201210.Google Scholar
35. Weaver, S. E. 1985. Geographic spread of Datura stramonium in association with soybeans and maize in Ontario, Canada. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds. p. 403410.Google Scholar
36. Zanin, G., and Berti, A. 1990. Possibilità e limiti di impiego delle soglie di infestazione nel mais (Zea mays L.). II Conf. Naz. sul Mais. Grado (GO) — Italy. 19–21 Sept., 1990. p. 181203.Google Scholar
37. Zanin, G., and Sattin, M. 1988. Threshold level and seed production of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus) in maize. Weed Res. 28:347352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Zanin, G., Berti, A., and Sattin, M. 1989. Croissance du mais (Zea mays L.) en competition avec Abutilon theophrasti Medicus. VIIIème Coll. Int. sur la Biol., l'Ecol. et la System. des Mauvaises Herbes, ANPPEWRS. p. 609618.Google Scholar
39. Zanin, G., Berti, A., and Sattin, M. 1989. Mais (Zea mays L.) — Abutilon theophrasti Medicus: effetto della durata e del periodo di competizione. Riv. Agron. 2:185192.Google Scholar
40. Zuin, M. C., and Zanin, G. 1989. Abutilon theophrasti Medicus: accrescimento, fenologia della riproduzione e possibili ipotesi sulla sua strategia biologica. Riv. Agron. 3:241248.Google Scholar