Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:58:20.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broadleaf Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max) with Chlorimuron plus Acifluorfen or Thifensulfuron Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Dale Monks ,
John W. Wilcut  and
John S. Richburg III
C. Dale Monks
Affiliation:
Div. Plant and Soil Sci., P.O. Box 6108, 1090 Agric. Sci., West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV 26506-6108
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Tidewater Agric. Exp. Stn., Va. Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA 23437
John S. Richburg III
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Univ. Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chlorimuron applied alone and in combination with acifluorfen or thifensulfuron was evaluated for POST control of common lambsquarters, common ragweed, common cocklebur, and a mixture of pitted, ivyleaf, entireleaf, and tall morningglory in soybean. Common cocklebur control was similar with thifensulfuron at 3 and 4 g ae ha−1 and with chlorimuron at 7 and 9 g ae ha−1, Common ragweed and morningglory control was greater with chlorimuron while common lambsquarters control was greater with thifensulfuron. Control of all species was good with combinations of chlorimuron at 7 g ha−1 plus thifensulfuron at 2 g ha−1 or acifluorfen at 140 g ae ha−1 and similar to or greater than the control with chlorimuron at 9 g ha−1. Soybean yields with all POST herbicide treatments were equivalent to that of the weed-free check.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidchlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidthifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]-carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidcommon cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. # XANSTcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia # AMBELivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHEentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integruiscula Gray # IPOHGtall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth. # PHBPUpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Deltapine 675’ and ‘Pioneer 9581’PostemergenceAMBELCHEALIPOHEIPOHGIPOLAPHBPUXANST
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 317 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H. 1990. Enhancement of soybean (Glycine max) injury and weed control by thifensulfuron-insecticide mixtures. Weed Technol. 4:524–528.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1992. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference, 8th Ed. Chemical Pharmaceutical Publ. Co. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY. 1892 p.Google Scholar
3. Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schleuter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. p. 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
4. Crook, T. M. and Renner, K. A. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) competition and time of removal in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:358–364.Google Scholar
5. DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365–374.Google Scholar
6. Devlin, D. L., Long, J. H., and Maddux, L. D. 1991. Using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:834–840.Google Scholar
7. Duke, S. D., Lydon, J., and Paul, R. N. 1989. Oxidation activity is similar to that of p-nitro-diphenyl ether herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:152–160.Google Scholar
8. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. D. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Crop Sci. 11:25–26.Google Scholar
9. Fielding, R. J. and Stoller, E. W. 1990. Effects of additives on the efficacy, uptake, and translocation of the methyl ester of thifensulfuron. Weed Sci. 38:172–178.Google Scholar
10. Green, J. M. 1991. Maximizing herbicide efficiency with mixtures and expert systems. Weed Technol. 5:894–897.Google Scholar
11. Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1990. Modelling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol. 4:186–198.Google Scholar
12. Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Dial, M. J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 4:163–168.Google Scholar
13. Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:169–172.Google Scholar
14. Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1988. Influence of imazapyr on the control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 36:663–666.Google Scholar
15. Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) control with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 3:95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Shurtleff, J. L. and Coble, H. D. 1985. Interference of certain broadleaf weed species in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:654–657.Google Scholar
17. Sorenson, V. W., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1987. The interaction of acifluorfen and bentazon in herbicidal combinations. Weed Sci. 35:449–456.Google Scholar
18. Stoller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., and Wax, L. M. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3:155–181.Google Scholar
19. Westberg, D. E. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Field confirmation of the antagonism between chlorimuron and acifluorfen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:40.Google Scholar
20. Westberg, D. E. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Effect of acifluorfen on the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of chlorimuron in certain weeds. Weed Technol. 6:4–12.Google Scholar
21. Wesley, M. T. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Interactions of diphenylether herbicides with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6:345–351.Google Scholar
22. Wilcut, J. W., Horton, D. N., and Former, L. D. 1990. Postemergence combinations with imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides in soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:40.Google Scholar
23. Wilcut, J. W. 1991. Tropic croton (Croton glandulosus) control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 5:795–798.Google Scholar
24. Wilson, H. P. and Hines, T. E. 1987. Snapbean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) response to acifluorfen. Weed Technol. 1:18–21.Google Scholar