Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:40:14.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autumn Vegetable Response to Residual Herbicides Applied the Previous Spring under Low-Density Polyethylene Mulch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Timothy L. Grey ,
Theodore M. Webster  and
A. Stanley Culpepper
Timothy L. Grey*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia and USDA/ARS, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31794
Theodore M. Webster
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia and USDA/ARS, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31794
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia and USDA/ARS, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31794
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2002 and 2005 to evaluate autumn vegetable tolerance to residual herbicides applied the previous spring under low-density polyethylene (LDPE) mulch. Spring applications of 1.12 kg/ha S-metolachlor, 0.027 kg/ha halosulfuron, 0.28 kg/ha sulfentrazone, and 1.12 kg/ha S-metolachlor plus 0.027 kg/ha halosulfuron were made under LDPE mulch in March of each year and included a nontreated control. After removal of the spring crop, vegetables were planted the following August. Seeded and transplanted squash, seeded cucumber, transplanted eggplant, and transplanted cabbage were evaluated. Injury to eggplant, cucumber, and transplanted and seeded squash ranged from 8 to 16% for halosulfuron, sulfentrazone, and S-metolachlor plus halosulfuron in 2002, but no injury was observed in 2005. Cabbage injury was less than 5% for any herbicide treatment either year. There were no differences for cabbage biomass for three harvests for any herbicide treatment relative to the nontreated control. Vine length for cucumber and transplanted squash was significantly reduced by sulfentrazone relative to the nontreated control. Eggplant yield for the first harvest was significantly reduced by sulfentrazone as compared with the nontreated control in 2002 but not in 2005. To avoid injury to rotational crops, growers should read all herbicide labels when considering spring herbicide applications under LDPE mulch when autumn vegetable plantings are part of their production scheme to ensure successful crop production.

Keywords

HalosulfuronS-metolachlorsulfentrazonecabbage, Brassica oleracea L.cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.eggplant, Solanum melongena L.squash, Cucurbita pepo L.Carryoversusceptibility to herbicidescrop biomassmethyl bromide alternatives
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 496 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K., Libbey, C., and Kadir, S. 1995. Broadleaf weed control and cabbage seed yield following herbicide application. Hort. Sci. 30:1211–1214.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2005. Horticulture. Vegetables. Athens, GA Cooperative Extension Service, University of Georgia College of Agriculture and Environmental Science On line at http://www.caes.uga.edu/publications/subject_list.html#Horticulture.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2006. Sulfentrazone. in New Pest Control Technologies. On line at http://ir4.rutgers.edu/newchem.cfm.Google Scholar
Csinos, A. S., Johnson, W. C., Johnson, A. W., Sumner, D. R., McPherson, R. M., and Gitaitis, R. D. 1997. Alternative fumigants for methyl bromide in tobacco and pepper transplant production. Crop Prot. 16:585–594.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. 2005. Commercial vegetables-weed control in 2005. Georgia Pest Control Handbook. Athens, GA Coop. Ext. Serv. Univ. Georgia Coll. Agr. Environ. Sci.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P., Noling, J. W., and Santos, B. M. 2004. Methyl bromide alternatives for bell pepper and cucumber rotations. Crop Prot. 23:347–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilreath, J. P. and Santos, B. M. 2004a. Efficacy of methyl bromide alternatives on purple nutsedge control in tomato and pepper. Weed Technol. 18:341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilreath, J. P. and Santos, B. M. 2004b. Herbicide dose and incorporation depth in combination with 1,3-dichloroporpene plus chloropicrin for Cyperus rotundus control in tomato and pepper. Crop Prot. 23:205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locascio, S. J., Gilreath, J. P., Dickson, S. W., Kucharek, T. A., Jones, J. P., and Noling, J. W. 1997. Fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for polyethylene-mulched tomato. Hort. Sci. 32:1208–1211.Google Scholar
Manning, G. R. and Fennimore, S. A. 2001. Evaluation of low-rate herbicides to supplement methyl bromide alternative fumigants to control weeds in strawberry. Hort. Technol. 11:603–609.Google Scholar
Motis, T. N., Locascio, S. J., Gilreath, J. P., and Stall, W. M. 2003. Season-long interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with polyethylene-mulched bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Weed Technol. 17:543–549.Google Scholar
Norton, J. 2004. Methyl bromide alternatives: Are we there yet? IR-4 Proj. Newsl. 33-2:4–5.Google Scholar
Obrigawitch, T., Abernathy, J. R., and Gipson, J. R. 1980. Response of yellow and purple nutsedge to metolachlor. Weed Sci. 28:708–715.Google Scholar
Particka, M. G. and Zandstra, B. H. 2004. Rimsulfuron carryover affects on cucumber, snapbean, and sugarbeet. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 59:160.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1998. Suppression of purple nutsedge with polyethylene film mulch. Weed Technol. 12:275–280.Google Scholar
Smart, J. R., Brandenberger, L., and Makus, D. 2001. Cabbage response to sulfentrazone for broadleaf weed control. J. Veg. Crop Prod. 7:97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, C. L., Coffey, D. L., and Mueller, T. C. 1999. Yellow nutsedge control and tomato injury as affected by the interaction of vapam and the herbicides Eptam, Tillam, and Matrix. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 52:82–83.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Hawf, L. R. 1995. Effect of MON-12037 on purple and yellow nutsedge. Weed Technol. 9:148–152.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2006. Weed survey—southern states: vegetable, fruit and nut crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:260–277.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Csinos, A. S., Johnson, A. W., Dowler, C. C., Sumner, D. R., and Fery, R. L. 2001. Methly bromide alternatives in a bell pepper–squash rotation. Crop Prot. 20:605–614.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Culpepper, A. S., and Johnson, W. C. III. 2003. Response of squash and cucumber cultivars to halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 17:173–176.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Walker, R. H., Grey, T. L., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Response of purple and yellow nutsedges to selective placement of sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45:382–387.Google Scholar