Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T09:07:06.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2,4-D Safening of Nicosulfuron and Terbufos Interaction in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David M. Simpson ,
Kevin E. Diehl  and
Edward W. Stoller
David M. Simpson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL. 61801
Kevin E. Diehl
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL. 61801
Edward W. Stoller
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Urbana, IL. 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Normal field applications of both terbufos and nicosulfuron can cause decreased corn tolerance to nicosulfuron because terbufos inhibits nicosulfuron metabolism. In greenhouse studies, applications of 2,4-D at 0.07, 0.14, and 0.28 kg/ha with nicosulfuron reduced terbufos induced foliar injury by more than 50%. Plants treated with nicosulfuron, terbufos, and 2,4-D had significantly higher shoot dry weights than those treated with nicosulfuron and terbufos. When 2,4-D was applied sooner than 24 h before nicosulfuron application or later than 24 h after nicosulfuron application, it did not prevent the interaction. Uptake of 14C-nicosulfuron was increased by the presence of terbufos but was unaffected by 2,4-D. Translocation of 14C-nicosulfuron was low with the highest amounts occurring in the nicosulfuron plus terbufos treatment. Terbufos reduced metabolism of nicosulfuron at 4 and 24 h after treatment compared to plants without terbufos. Metabolism of nicosulfuron in plants treated with terbufos was increased by 2,4-D to a rate equivalent to that in plants not treated with terbufos.

Keywords

2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidnicosulfuron, 2[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N-N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamideterbufos, S-[(tert-butylthio)methyl]-O,O-diethyl phosphoridi- thioatecorn, Zea mays L.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 547 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrett, M. and Polge, N. 1993. In-vitro nicosulfuron metabolism by corn microsomal preparations. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:86.Google Scholar
2. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. p. 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kauffman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Modes of Action, Vol 3. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
3. Biediger, D. L., Baumann, P. A., Weaver, D. N., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1992. Interactions between primisulfuron and selected soil-applied insecticides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:807–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Brown, H. M., Dietrich, R. F., Kenyon, W. H., and Lichtner, F. T. 1991 Prospects for the biorational design of crop selective herbicides. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 7A-2: 847.Google Scholar
5. Burton, J. D., Maness, E. M., Monks, D. W., and Robinson, D. K. 1992 Differential herbicide tolerance of ‘Landmark’ and ‘Merit’ sweet corn is due to different rates of metabolism. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:91.Google Scholar
6. Camacho, R. F., Moshier, L. J., Morishita, D. W., and Devlin, D. L. 1991 Rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in corn with primisulfuron and nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 5:789–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Diehl, K. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1991. Effect of soil organic matter on the interaction between terbufos and nicosulfuron in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:6.Google Scholar
8. Diehl, K. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1992. Effect of terbufos on the metabolism of nicosulfuron in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:99.Google Scholar
9. Fonne-Pfister, R., Gaudin, K., Kreuz, K., Ramsteiner, K., and Ebert, E. 1990 Hydroxylation of primisulfuron by an inducible cytochrome p450-dependent monooxygenase system from maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Foy, C. L. and Witt, H. L. 1990. Johnsongrass control with DPX-V9360 and CGA-146872 in corn (Zea mays) in Virginia. Weed Technol. 4:615–619.Google Scholar
11. Frazier, T. L., Nissen, S. J., Mortensen, S. S., and Meinke, L. J. 1991. Influence of terbufos on primisulfuron uptake, translocation, and metabolism in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:47.Google Scholar
12. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York. p. 187–214.Google Scholar
13. Guethle, D. R., Sims, B. D., House, J. L., and Muyanga, C. K. 1991. Interaction between CGA-136872, 2,4-D and terbufos in corn. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 44:107.Google Scholar
14. Kern, C. L., Moses, A. J., Stamm, D. E., Threewitt, T. B., and Dill, T. R. 1991. Soil residual activity of primisulfuron and nicosulfuron on sorghum species. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:47.Google Scholar
15. Ketchersid, M. L. and Merkle, M. G. 1991. Interaction of sulfonylurea herbicides and 2,4-D in sorghum and corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:109.Google Scholar
16. Reynolds, D. B., Burris, E., Leonard, B. R., and Stephens, M. 1991. Interaction of sulfonylurea herbicides with in-furrow application of organophosphate insecticides in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:103.Google Scholar