Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:42:52.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Woody Plant Shoot Management and Response to Herbicidal Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. P. Upchurch ,
J. A. Keaton  and
H. D. Coble
R. P. Upchurch
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina Agricultural Division, Monsanto Co., St. Louis, Mo.
J. A. Keaton
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina Elanco Products Co., Raleigh, North Carolina
H. D. Coble
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina Agronomy Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Shoots of naturally established, foliated red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and persimmon (Diospyros virginiana L.) growing in North Carolina were treated with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) or 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) formulations following various shoot management procedures. Shoot management prior to treatment consisted of decapitating or not decapitating shoots at 2 inches above the ground line in May when the plants were 3 to 6 ft high. Herbicidal applications were made to uncut shoots and to resprouts of previously cut shoots at 30 and 60 days after decapitation. Responses measured 10, 14, and 22 months after treatment were percent control or original shoots, percent control of new shoots, shoot height, number of live stems/plant. The original shoot and new shoot values were averaged to provide a total shoot control index. Spraying of previously cut shoots at 30 or 60 days after cutting was more effective than spraying of uncut shoots except for 2,4,5-T applied to persimmon. The average total shoot control index for 2,4-D treated red maple, considering all rates, application dates, and evaluation dates was 82% for previously cut shoots and 56% for uncut shoots while the corresponding heights were 0.9 and 4.2 ft, respectively. For 2,4,5-T-treated red maple, the total shoot control indices were 92% and 78% for previously cut and uncut shoots, respectively, while the corresponding heights were 0.4 and 1.4 ft. For persimmon, there was a net advantage for treating previously cut shoots with 2,4-D, but the reverse was true for 2,4,5-T. The results are consistent with the theoretical behavior of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T in woody plants outlined as a basis for conducting the study. Alternate explanations of results are proposed and practical implications described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 175 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1961. Chemical control of brush and trees. USDA Farmers' Bull. No. 2158. 23 p.Google Scholar
2. Basler, Eddie. 1962. Penetration, movement and behavior of herbicides in woody plants. Proc. SWC 15:8–15.Google Scholar
3. Basler, Eddie. 1964. The dicarboxylation of phenoxyacetic acid herbicides by excised leaves of woody plants. Weeds 12:14–16.Google Scholar
4. Basler, E., King, C. C., Badiei, A. A., and Santelmann, P. W. 1964. The breakdown of phenoxy herbicides in blackjack oak. Proc. SWC 17:351–355.Google Scholar
5. Beatty, Robert H. 1953. Brush control. Status of chemical methods. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1:178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Coble, H. D., Upchurch, R. P., and Keaton, J. A. 1969. Response of woody species to 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T and picloram as a function of treatment method. Weed Sci. 17:40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Coulter, L. L. 1954. Some aspects of right-of-way brush control with 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D. Weeds 3:21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fisher, C. E., Meadors, C. H., and Behrens, Richard. 1956. Some factors that influence the effectiveness of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid in killing mesquite. Weeds 4:139–147.Google Scholar
9. Haas, R. H., Darrow, R. A., and Lehman, S. K. 1964. Evaluation of herbicides for the control of common persimmon. Proc. SWC 17:278–283.Google Scholar
10. Kirch, John H. 1962. The business of controlling woody plants. Proc. WWCC 65–74.Google Scholar
11. Klingman, Dayton L. 1962. Problems and progress in woody plant control on rangelands. Proc. SWC 15:35–43.Google Scholar
12. Leonard, O. A. 1956. Studies of factors affecting the control of chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum) with herbicides. Weeds 4:241–254.Google Scholar
13. Leonard, O. A. and Murphy, A. H. 1965. Relationship between herbicide movement and stump sprouting. Weeds 13, 26–30.Google Scholar
14. Norris, L. A. and Freed, V. H. 1966. The metabolism of a series of chlorophenoxyalkyl acid herbicides in bigleaf maple, Acer macrophyllum Pursh. Weed Res. 6:212–220.Google Scholar
15. Upchurch, R. P. and Keaton, J. A. 1961. Woody plant control research-Techniques and results. Proc. SWC 14:272. (Abstr.) Google Scholar
16. Woods, Frank W. and Cassady, John T. 1961. Hardwood sprout development on cleared sites. Sprouting of sandhills scrub oaks following cutting. Southern For. Exp. Sta. USDA Occasional Paper 186:1–6.Google Scholar
17. Worley, D. P., Bramble, W. C., and Byrnes, W. R. 1957. Investigations of the use of 2,4,5-T esters as a basal spray in the control of bear oak. Weeds 5:121–132.Google Scholar