Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:35:34.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) and Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Growth and Development in Monoculture and Mixed Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Don W. Morishita  and
Donald C. Thill
Don W. Morishita
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Advance’) and wild oat (Avena fatua L. # AVEFA) were grown in the field in monoculture and mixed culture (additively) to compare their seasonal growth and development. Barley and wild oat tiller and tiller head production were reduced by the interference (higher density) of the other species. Plant height of either species was not affected by interference of the other. Wild oat biomass was reduced more and at an earlier growth stage (two to three tillers) than was barley biomass (heading) in mixed culture. Barley and wild oat grown in monoculture had similar total plant nitrogen content throughput the growing season. Gas exchange and water potential of barley and wild oat in monoculture and mixed culture were similar. All measurements indicated that barley and wild oat grown in monoculture had growth and development patterns that were similar. In mixed culture, however, barley was more competitive with wild oat than wild oat was with barley. Wild oat reduced barley yield component quality and grain yield.

Keywords

Interferencecompetitiongas exchangeplant-water potentialAVEFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 43 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akey, W. C. and Morrison, I. N. 1984. Effects of soil moisture on the vegetative growth of wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 32:625–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bremner, J. M. 1965. Total nitrogen. Pages 1149–1178 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agron. No. 9. Am., Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
3. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1986. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: Effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34:29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1972. Germination periodicity, plant survival and seed production in populations Avena fatua growing in spring barley. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 218–225.Google Scholar
5. Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1974. The time of onset of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and spring cereals. Weed Res. 14:197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Haizel, K. A. and Harper, J. L. 1973. The effects of density and timing of removal on interference between barley, white mustard and wild oats. J. Appl. Ecol. 10:23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. East-West Center, Univ. of Hawaii Press. 609 pp.Google Scholar
8. McBeath, D. K., Dew, D. A., and Friesen, H. A. 1970. Competition between barley and wild oats as affected by nitrogen, barban and time of seeding. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50:541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. McNamara, D. W. 1976. Wild oat density and the duration wild oat competition as it influences wheat growth and yields. Aust. J. Agric. Anim. Husb. 16:402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Morishita, D. W. and Thill, D. C. 1988. Factors of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference on spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 36:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Morrow, L. A. and Gealy, D. R. 1983. Growth characteristics of wild oat (Avena fatua) in the Pacific Northwest. Weed Sci. 31:226–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1935. Root development of weeds and crop in competition under dry farming. Sci. Agric. 16:151–160.Google Scholar
13. Peters, N.C.B. and Wilson, B. J. 1983. Some studies on the competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley. II. Variation of A. fatua emergence and development and its influence on crop yield. Weed Res. 23:305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Pfeiffer, R. K. and Holmes, H. M. 1961. A study of the competition between barley and oats as influenced by barley seedrate, nitrogen level and barban treatment. Weed Res. 1:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Bradstreet, E. D., and Hemmingsen, E. A. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Sci. 148: 339–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Scragg, E. R. and McKelvie, A. D. 1976. The effect of certain species of weeds on the grain yield of spring barley. Ann. Appl. Biol. 83:335–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Sharma, M. P., McBeath, D. K., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1977. Studies on the biology of wild oats. II. Growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:811–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Thurston, J. M. 1959. A comparative study of the growth of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and of cultivated cereals with varied nitrogen supply. Ann. Appl. Biol. 47:716–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Thurston, J. M. 1962. The effect of competition from cereal crops on the germination and growth of Avena fatua L. in a naturally infested field. Weed Res. 2:192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Williams, B. A., Gurner, P. J., and Austin, R. B. 1982. A new infrared gas analyzer and portable photosynthesis meter. Photosynth. Res. 3:141–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Wilson, B. J., Cousans, G. W., and Ayers, P. 1974. The effects of triallate and barban on the control of Avena fatua in spring barley on the yield of barley and the presence of Avena fatua seeds in the harvested grain. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 25–32.Google Scholar
22. Wilson, B. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1982. Some studies of competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley. I. The influence of A. fatua L. on yield of barley. Weed Res. 22: 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar