Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:27:16.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Mustard (Sinapis arvensis) Control in Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) with Fluorochloridone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George H. Friesen
George H. Friesen*
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., Agric. Canada, Res. Stn., Morden, MB, Canada ROG 1JO
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fluorochloridone {3-chloro-4-(chloromethyl)-1-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2-pyrrolidinone} effectively controlled wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L. # SINAR) in sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L. ‘Hybrid 894′). Preemergence (pre) treatments were more effective than preplant-incorporated (ppi) treatments at rates of 0.3 to 1.1 kg ai/ha. Applied as a foliar spray, fluorochloridone at rates of 0.12 to 0.25 kg ai/ha controlled 96% or more of wild mustard but some crop injury occurred. When fluorochloridone was mixed with trifluralin [2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine] or EPTC (S-ethyl dipropyl carbamothioate) and applied ppi, several annual grasses as well as wild mustard were controlled.

Keywords

EPTCTrifluralinAvena fatuaSetaria viridisAVEFASETVISINAR
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technolgy
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , March 1987 , pp. 228 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Devlin, R. M., Kisiel, M. J., and Kostusiak, A. S. 1979. Influence of R-40244 on pigment content of wheat and corn. Weed Res. 19:59–61.Google Scholar
2. Friesen, G. H. and Chubb, W. O. 1986. Effect of incorporation method and soil type on selectivity of metribuzin in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Weed Res. 26:341–345.Google Scholar
3. Hamill, A. S., Marriage, P. B., and Friesen, G. H. 1977. A method for assessing herbicide performance in small plot experiments. Weed Sci. 25:386–389.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, B. J. 1971. Effect of weed competition in sunflowers. Weed Sci. 19:378–380.Google Scholar
5. Roberts, H. A., Bond, W., and Potter, M. E. 1980. Evaluation of R-40244 for weed control in drilled vegetable crops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 94:48–49.Google Scholar
6. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, T. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
7. Thomas, A. G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Sci. 33:34–43.Google Scholar