Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:53:27.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wheat Tolerance to TCA for Green Foxtail Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. N. P. Chow  and
R. D. Dryden
P. N. P. Chow
Affiliation:
Res. Sta., Can. Dep. Agr., Brandon, Manitoba, R7A 5Z7, Canada
R. D. Dryden
Affiliation:
Res. Sta., Can. Dep. Agr., Brandon, Manitoba, R7A 5Z7, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seven cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and one hybrid (Triticale hexaploid Lart. ‘Rosner’) were evaluated in seven field experiments and one greenhouse test for tolerance to the postemergence application of the sodium salt of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for the control of green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.). The control of green foxtail and broadleaf weeds was also studied. Of the seven cultivars, ‘Pitic 62’ and ‘Stewart’ were most susceptible to injury from TCA. All other cultivars were tolerant to 0.56 kg/ha. ‘Selkirk’ appeared to be most resistant. With ‘Manitou’ 0.56 kg/ha of TCA gave about 50% control of green foxtail. Higher rates permitted increased growth of broadleaf weeds as a result of reduced competition from injured wheat and green foxtail. Control of all weeds was improved by 10 to 30% when TCA was applied with one of the phenoxy herbicides. Satisfactory crop tolerance and good weed control was achieved with 0.56 kg/ha TCA and 0.56 kg/ha of the amine salt of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D).

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 1973 , pp. 238 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, D. A. 1959. TCA applied to crops of oats and barley for control of green foxtail. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 16:78–79.Google Scholar
2. Dryden, R. D. and Whitehead, C. W. 1963. The effect of TCA on green foxtail in competition with cereals. Can. J. Plant Sci. 43:451–456.Google Scholar
3. Friesen, G. and Shebeski, L. H. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:457–467.Google Scholar
4. Friesen, G. and Shebeski, L. H. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. II. Effects of weed competition on the protein content of cereal crops. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:652–658.Google Scholar
5. Yates, P. and Hale, R. W. 1939. The analysis of Latin squares when two or more rows, columns, or treatments are missing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Suppl. 6:67–79.Google Scholar
6. Yates, F. 1933. The analysis of replicated experiments when the field results are incomplete. Empire of Expt. Agr. 1:129–142.Google Scholar