Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:25:53.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Seed Demise in Soil in Weed-Free Corn (Zea mays) Production Across Nebraska

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Orvin C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska at Lincoln, Concord, Clay Center, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, respectively
Russell S. Moomaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska at Lincoln, Concord, Clay Center, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, respectively
Fred W. Roeth
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska at Lincoln, Concord, Clay Center, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, respectively
Gail A. Wicks
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska at Lincoln, Concord, Clay Center, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, respectively
Robert G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska at Lincoln, Concord, Clay Center, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, respectively

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at five locations in Nebraska to determine the extent of demise of weed seed in soil when seed production was eliminated from 1975 through 1979 in corn (Zea mays L.). Weed yields, weed seed production, and corn yields were determined under four weed management levels in 1980. Annual broadleaf weed seed were more prevalent than grass seed in cultivated soil throughout the study. The population of viable weed seed in soil declined 95% during the 5-yr period that weed seed production was eliminated. Weed seed buildup recovered to within 90% of the 1975 level during 1980 at Concord and Clay Center but remained low at Lincoln, North Platte, and Scottsbluff. Thus, seed longevity in soil was sometimes sufficient to withstand modern weed control methods and still reinfest a field after 5 yr of eliminating weed seed production. Corn yields were maintained 1 yr with minimum weed management effort following 5 yr of no weed seed production.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1975. Minimum tillage: a preliminary technology assessment. U.S. Dep. Agric., Office of Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC. 89 pp.Google Scholar
2. Brenchley, W. E. 1936. The weed seed population of arable soil, III. The reestablishment of weed species after reduction by fallowing. J. Ecol. 24:479501.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. 1981. Changing weed problems with conservation tillage. Pages 167179 in Conference on Crop Production with Conservation in the 80's. ASAE Publ. No. 7–81, St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., Evetts, L. L., and Mumm, R. F. 1981. Germination of exhumed weed seed in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 29:577586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1982. Weed control in corn planted into untitled winter wheat stubble. Agron. J. 74:521526.Google Scholar
6. Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seeds, II. The influence of tillage treatments on germination. Sci. Agric. 26:347357.Google Scholar
7. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1983. Longevity of weed seeds after 5.5 years in the Stoneville 50-year buried-seed study. Weed Sci. 32:264270.Google Scholar
8. Ennis, W. B. Jr. 1977. Integration of weed control technologies. Pages 227242 in Fryer, J. D. and Matsunaka, S., eds. Integrated Control of Weeds. Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
9. Jordan, L. S. and Day, B. E. 1970. Weed control in citrus. Pages 128142 in FAO International Conference Weed Control, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
10. Kivilaan, A. and Bandurski, R. S. 1981. The one-hundred-year period for Dr. Beat's seed viability experiment. Am. J. Bot. 68: 12901292.Google Scholar
11. Lueschen, W. E. and Anderson, R. N. 1980. Longevity of velvetleaf seeds in soil under agricultural practices. Weed Sci. 28:341346.Google Scholar
12. Roberts, H. A. 1968. The changing population of viable weed seeds in an arable soil. Weed Res. 8:253256.Google Scholar
13. Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. 1972. Fate of seeds of some annual weeds in different depths of cultivated and undisturbed soil. Weed Res. 12:316324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Robinson, R. G. 1949. Annual weeds, their viable seed population in the soil and their effect on yields of oats, wheat, and flax. Agron. J. 41:513518.Google Scholar
15. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after six years of continuous corn (Zea mays) and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:7683.Google Scholar
16. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after rotation of crops and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:8489.Google Scholar
17. Shaw, W. C. and Jansen, L. L. 1972. Chemical weed control strategies for the future. Pages 197215 in Pest Control Strategies for the Future. Nat. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
18. Watteyne, K. K., Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., Moomaw, R. S., Wilson, R. G., and Roeth, F. W. 1981. Influence of 100% weed control on demise of weed seeds in soil over years across Nebraska. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:21.Google Scholar
19. Wicks, G. A. 1976. Ecofallow: a reduced tillage system for the Great Plains. Weeds Today 7(2):2023.Google Scholar