Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:53:11.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) with Desmedipham and Phenmedipham

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Monte D. Anderson  and
W. Eugene Arnold
Monte D. Anderson
Affiliation:
Plant Science Dept., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
W. Eugene Arnold
Affiliation:
Plant Science Dept., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Desmedipham [ethyl m-hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate(ester)] controlled wild mustard (Sinapsis arvensis L. ♯3 SINAR) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L. ♯ AMARE) more effectively than phenmedipham (methyl m-hydroxycarbanilate m-methylcarbanilate). A synergistic interaction occurred with all tank-mix combinations of the two herbicides for wild mustard control, except combinations containing 0.71 kg ai/ha of desmedipham. The magnitude of the synergism decreased as the rate of desmedipham was increased and increased as the rate of phenmedipham increased. Both herbicides caused injury symptoms of leaf necrosis and height reduction to sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.). Crop injury and sunflower heights were affected more by desmedipham than by phenmedipham. Injury effects were temporary and had no influence on sunflower yields.

Keywords

Amaranthus retroflexusSinapsis arvensisantagonismsynergismAMARESINAR
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 310 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chew, V. 1976. Comparing treatment means: A compendium. Hortic. Sci. 11:348–357.Google Scholar
2. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. 1975. Cycloate and phenmedipham as complementary treatments in sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 23:478–485.Google Scholar
4. Evans, R. A., Easi, D. A., Book, D. N., and Young, J. A. 1982. Quadratic response surface analysis of seed-germination trials. Weed Sci. 30:411–416.Google Scholar
5. Flore, J. A. and Bukovac, M. J. 1974. Pesticide effects on the plant cuticle: I. Response of Brassica oleracea L. to EPTC as indexed by epicuticular wax production. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 99(1):34–37.Google Scholar
6. Flore, J. A. and Bukovac, M. J. 1976. Pesticide effects on the plant cuticle: II. EPTC effects on leaf cuticle morphology and composition in Brassica oleracea L. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 101(5):586–590.Google Scholar
7. Gentner, W. A. 1966. The influence of EPTC on external foliage wax deposition. Weeds 14:27–31.Google Scholar
8. Hendrick, L. W., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1974. Basis for selectivity of phenmedipham and desmedipham on wild mustard, redroot pigweed, and sugarbeet. Weed Sci. 22:179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D. and Miller, S. D. 1982. Postemergence wild mustard control in sunflowers. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 39:160–161.Google Scholar
10. Nalewaja, J. D. and Miller, S. D. 1980. Preplant, preemergence and postemergence weed control in sunflower. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 37:144–147.Google Scholar
11. Nash, R. G. and Jansen, L. L. 1973. Determining phytotoxic pesticide interactions in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 2:503–510.Google Scholar
12. Peterson, R. G. 1977. Use and misuse of multiple comparison procedures. Agron. J. 69:205–208.Google Scholar
13. Schweizer, E. E. and Weatherspoon, D. M. 1971. Response of sugarbeets and weeds to phenmedipham and two analogues. Weed Sci. 19:635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Strand, O. E. and Warnes, D. D. 1982. Weed control in sunflowers at Morris, MN, in 1982. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 39:154–155.Google Scholar
15. Strand, O. E. and Wiersma, J. V. 1982. Weed control in sunflowers at Crookston, MN, in 1982. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 39:152–153.Google Scholar