Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:20:46.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Volatility of Eleven Dinitroaniline Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. V. Parochetti
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
G. W. Dec Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
G. W. Burt
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

Abstract

Vapors of 11 dinitroaniline herbicides from soil were trapped in a Florisil column under controlled laboratory conditions for a 3-hr period. No vapor losses of nitralin [4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropylaniline] and oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsulfanilamide) were detected at the highest temperature, 50 C, from moist Lakeland sand with an air flow of 50 ml/min; whereas, under the same conditions vapor losses approached 25% for benefin (N-butyl-N-ethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-p-toluidine), profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine] and trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine). Vapor losses for the remaining herbicides studied were moderate with values ranging between 2 and 13%. Volatility of all herbicides increased with increasing temperatures of 30, 40, and 50 C. Vapor losses for each herbicide from Hagerstown clay loam, Littleton silt loam and Lakeland sand were statistically different for five of the 11 herbicides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1972. Technical report on EL-119. Eli Lilly and Co. bulletin, Indianapolis, IN, 4 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, W.P., Richards, Anna B., and Whitworth, J.W. 1968. Leaching of trifluralin, benefin and nitralin in soil columns. Weed Sci. 16:165169.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, W.L. and Warren, G.F. 1971. Differential phytotoxicity of trifluralin and nitralin. Weed Sci. 19:3137.Google Scholar
4. Bode, L.E., Day, C.L., Gebhardt, M.R., and Goering, C.E. 1973. Prediction of trifluralin diffusion coefficients. Weed Sci. 21:485489.Google Scholar
5. Gray, R.A. and Weierich, A.J. 1965. Factors affecting the vapor loss of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141147.Google Scholar
6. Harvey, R.G. 1974. Soil adsorption and volatility of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:120124.Google Scholar
7. Jackson, M.L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 498 pp.Google Scholar
8. Ketchersid, M.L., Bovey, R.W., and Merkle, M.G. 1969. The detection of trifluralin vapors in air. Weed Sci. 17:484485.Google Scholar
9. Koren, Ephraim. 1972. Leaching of trifluralin and oryzalin in soil with three surfactants. Weed Sci. 20:230232.Google Scholar
10. Murray, D.S., Santelmann, P.W., and Greer, H.A.L. 1973. Differential phytotoxicity of several dinitroaniline herbicides. Agron. J. 65:3436.Google Scholar
11. Parochetti, J.V. and Warren, G.F. 1966. Vapor losses of IPC and CIPC. Weeds 14:281285.Google Scholar
12. Parochetti, J.V. and Hein, E.R. 1973. Volatility and photodecomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21:469473.Google Scholar
13. Swann, C.W. and Behrens, R. 1972. Phytotoxicity of trifluralin vapors from soil. Weed Sci. 20:143146.Google Scholar
14. Swann, C.W. and Behrens, R. 1972. Trifluralin vapor emission from soil. Weed Sci. 20:147149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Weber, J.B. and Monaco, T.J. 1972. Review of the chemical and physical properties of substituted dinitroaniline herbicides. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 25:3132.Google Scholar
16. Wright, W.L. and Warren, G.F. 1965. Photochemical decomposition of trifluralin. Weeds 13:329331.Google Scholar