Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:25:09.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Volatility and Photodecomposition of Trifluralin, Benefin, and Nitralin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. V. Parochetti
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
E. R. Hein
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

Abstract

Vapor losses of trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), benefin (N-butyl-N-ethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-p-toluidine), and nitralin [4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropylaniline] were studied under controlled laboratory conditions using a Florisil vapor trap. No nitralin vapor losses were detected at 50 C from a Lakeland loamy sand at field capacity with an air flow rate of 0.04 m3/hr for 3 hr; whereas, 24.5% and 12.5% of trifluralin and benefin, respectively, were lost as vapors. Volatility of trifluralin and benefin increased with increasing temperatures of 30, 40, and 50 C and increasing soil moisture from air dryness to field capacity. Vapor losses from granular benefin were similar to the spray applications at 30 and 40 C. Volatilization of granular trifluralin was reduced when compared to the spray application at 40 C and 30 C but was similar for both formulations for benefin. No significant losses from photodecomposition were noted for trifluralin, benefin, or nitralin when comparing radiated and unradiated soil surface treated samples.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, W. P., Richards, Anna Beth, and Whitmore, J. W. 1968. Leaching of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin in soil columns. Weed Sci. 16:165169.Google Scholar
2. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soils. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:8992.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, W. L. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Differential phytotoxicity of trifluralin and nitralin. Weed Sci. 19:3137.Google Scholar
4. Gray, R. A. and Weierick, A. J. 1965. Factors affecting vapor losses of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141146.Google Scholar
5. Harrison, R. M. and Anderson, O. E. 1970. Soil analysis of trifluralin. Methodology and factors affecting quantitation. Agron. J. 62:778781.Google Scholar
6. Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 498 pp.Google Scholar
7. Ketchersid, M. L., Bovey, R. W., and Merkle, M. G. 1969. The detection of trifluralin vapors in air. Weed Sci. 17:484485.Google Scholar
8. Messersmith, C. G., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1971. Biological and non-biological dissipation of trifluralin from soil. Weed Sci. 19:285290.Google Scholar
9. McMahon, R. E. 1966. The photochemical demethylation of N-methyl-2,6-dinitro-4-trifluoromethylaniline. A possible method for enzymatic dealkylation. Tehradehron Letters (No. 21) 23072310.Google Scholar
10. Parochetti, J. V. and Warren, G. F. 1966. Vapor losses of IPC and CIPC. Weeds 14:281285.Google Scholar
11. Parochetti, J. V., Hein, E. R., and Colby, S. R. 1971. Volatility of dichlobenil. Weed Sci. 19:2831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. 1969. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349352.Google Scholar
13. Weber, J. B. and Monaco, T. J. 1972. Review of the chemical and physical properties of the substituted dinitroaniline herbicides. Proc. S. Weed Sci. 25:3137.Google Scholar
14. Wright, W. L. and Warren, G. F. 1965. Photochemical decomposition of trifluralin. Weeds 13:329331.Google Scholar