Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:39:36.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velvetleaf Control as Influenced by Herbicide Placement and Seed Depth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald E. Herr  and
Edward W. Stroube
Donald E. Herr
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio
Edward W. Stroube
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a 3-year field study, from 51 to 1% of seed of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic) planted at 1 and 6-inch depths, respectively, produced established plants. Utilizing a microplot technique, 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (atrazine) and the ammonium salt of 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (amiben) were applied at 2 and 3 lb/A, respectively, at soil depths of 0, 2, and 4 inches. Velvetleaf seed were planted at depths of 1, 2, and 3 inches. Compared with the number of plants establishing in untreated plots, surface-applied amiben reduced the number of established plants 39, 23, and 29% from seed planted at depths of 1, 2, and 3 inches, respectively. Amiben at or below seed depth gave over 95% control, and when applied below the soil surface but above the seed, 86% control. Atrazine, surface-applied, reduced weed establishment 33, 62, and 85% from seed planted at depths of 1, 2, and 3 inches, respectively. When atrazine was at, below, or above the seed but below the soil surface, control was 96% or higher.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , July 1970 , pp. 459 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P., Furtick, W. R., and Fang, S. C. 1965. Soils incorporation placement studies with EPTC and other carbamate herbicides on Avena sativa . Weed Res. 5:115–122.Google Scholar
2. Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seeds. II. The influence of tillage treatments on germination. Sci. Agr. 26:347–357.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. and Burns, V. F. 1962. Emergence of barnyardgrass, green foxtail and yellow foxtail seedlings from various soil depths. Weeds 10:136–139.Google Scholar
4. Hanf, M. 1944. Keimung von unkrautern unter verschedenen bedingungen im boden [Germination of weed seed under different soil conditions] Land W. Jahrb. 93(2): 169–259. Bio. Abstr. 24:33902.Google Scholar
5. Hauser, E. W. 1965. Preemergence activity of three thiocarbamate herbicides in relation to depth of placement in soil. Weeds 13:255–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Knake, E. L., Appleby, A. P., and Furtick, W. R. 1967. Soil incorporation and site of uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weeds 15:228–232.Google Scholar
7. Knake, E. L., Wax, L. M., and Slife, F. W. 1968. The importance of the shoot of giant foxtail for uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 16:393–395.Google Scholar
8. Parker, C. 1966. The importance of shoot entry in the action of herbicides applied to soil. Weeds 14:117–121.Google Scholar
9. Steinbauer, G. P. and Grigsby, B. 1959. Methods of obtaining field and laboratory germination of seeds of bindweeds, lady's thumb, and velvetleaf. Weeds 7:41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Upchurch, R. P., Selman, F. L., and Webster, H. L. 1968. Incorporated vernolate and other weed control treatments for peanut production. Weed Sci. 16:317–323.Google Scholar
11. Wiese, A. F. and Davis, R. G. 1967. Weed emergence from two soils at various moisture, temperatures, and depths. Weeds 15:118–121.Google Scholar
12. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morning glory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14:49–51.Google Scholar