Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:41:10.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in vetch (Vicia spp.) response to Orobanche aegyptiaca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Yaakov Goldwasser ,
Yeshayahu Kleifeld ,
Dina Plakhine  and
Baruch Rubin
Yaakov Goldwasser
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Yeshayahu Kleifeld
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Dina Plakhine
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
Baruch Rubin
Affiliation:
Department of Field Crops, Vegetables and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Orobanche aegyptiaca is a chlorophyll-lacking holoparasite that subsists on the roots of plants, inflicting severe damage to legumes and other crops in the Mediterranean region. Common vetch and purple vetch are important legume forage crops in Israel and the Middle East. Experiments in pots containing soil inoculated with O. aegyptiaca seeds have shown that common vetch genotypes ‘Yovel’ and ‘473-A’ are susceptible to the parasite, whereas purple vetch genotypes ‘Popany’ and ‘Sadot’ are resistant. When grown in association with O. aegyptiaca in polyethene bags, purple vetch genotypes stimulated a significantly higher rate of parasite seed germination than that stimulated by common vetch genotypes. However, the number of successful Orobanche attachments developed on the host root was lower on resistant genotypes compared to susceptible ones. This differential response between purple and common vetch genotypes was evident at diverse temperature regimes (17/12, 22/17, and 27/22 C day/night). Microscopic observations revealed that resistant genotypes rapidly developed necrotic lesions surrounding the contact point of the parasite radicle (germ tube) with the host root, hence preventing further development of the parasite. In the sensitive genotypes, attachments developed without necrotic lesions. These data may indicate involvement of host defense mechanisms induced by the parasite attachment.

Keywords

Egyptian broomrape, Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers. ORAAEcrenate broomrape, Orobanche crenata Forsk. ORACRcommon vetch, Vicia sativa L. VICSApurple vetch, Vicia atropurpurea Desf. VISBEVetchVicia spp.Orobanche aegyptiacacommon vetchVicia sativapurple vetchVicia atropurpureaLignificationtoleranceOrobanche crenataVICSAVICBEORACRcrenate broomrapeORAAE
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 6 , December 1997 , pp. 756 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Cubero, J. I. 1994. Breeding work in Spain for Orobanche resistance in faba bean and sunflower. Pages 465–473 in Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Dorr, I., Staak, A., and Kollmann, R. 1994. Resistance of Helianthus to Orobanche—histological and cytological studies. Pages 276–289 in Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third Internarional Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Foy, C. L., Jain, R., and Jacobsohn, R. 1989. Recent approaches for chemical control of broomrape. Rev. Weed Sci. 4: 123–152.Google Scholar
Gil, J., Martin, L. M., and Cubero, J. I. 1987. Genetics of resistance in Vicia sativa to Orobanche crenata Forsk. Plant Breed. 99: 134–143.Google Scholar
Gordon-Ish-Shalom, N. 1989. Resistance of sunflower to Orobanche. . Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel. 132 p.Google Scholar
Hassan-Ali, A. 1983. Strigol analogues: synthetic achievements and prospects. Pages 125–132 in: Ayensu, E. S., Doggett, H., Keynes, R. D., Marton-Lefevre, J., Musselman, L. J., Parker, C., and Pickering, A., eds. Striga Biology and Control. Ottawa, Canada: ICSU Press.Google Scholar
Ish-Shalom-Gordon, N., Jacobsohn, R., and Cohen, Y. 1994. Seasonal fluctuations in sunflower's resistance to Orobanche cumana . Pages 351–355 in Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third Internarional Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Kleifeld, Y., Goldwasser, Y., Herzlinger, G., et al. 1994. Differential response of pepper varieties to Orobanche spp. as a measure for using peppers as trap crops. Phytoparasitica 22: 144–145.Google Scholar
Lane, J. A., Child, D. V., Reiss, G. R., and Baily, J. A. 1994. Host specificity of Striga gesnerioides and initial development on resistant and susceptible cowpeas. Pages 365–372 in Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Linke, K. H., Abd El-Moneim, A. M., and Saxena, M. C. 1993. Variation in resistance of some forage legumes species to Orobanche crenata Forsk. Field Crops Res. 32: 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musselman, L. J. 1980. The biology of Striga, Orobanche and other root parasitic weeds. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 18: 463–489.Google Scholar
Olivier, A. O., Benhamou, N., Gilles, D., and Leroux, D. 1991. Cell surface interactions between sorghum roots and the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica: aspects of cellulose distribution in resistant and susceptible host tissues. Can. J. Bot. 69: 1679–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panchenko, A. V. and Antonova, T. S. 1974. Specificity of the protective reaction of sunflower forms resistant to the introduction of broomrape. Agric. Biol. 9: 554–558. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Van Woerden, I. C., Van Ast, A., Zaitoun, F.M.F., and ter Borg, S. J. 1994. Root exudates of resistant faba bean cultivars are strong stimulants of broomrape germination. Pages 169–172 in Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Zaitoun, F.M.F. and ter Borg, S. J. 1994. Resistance against Orobanche crenata in Egyptian and Spanish faba beans. Pages 264–275 in Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar