Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:02:04.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vapor Movement of Synthetic Auxin Herbicides: Aminocyclopyrachlor, Aminocyclopyrachlor-Methyl Ester, Dicamba, and Aminopyralid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen D. Strachan
Affiliation:
DuPont Stine–Haskell Research Center, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE 19711
Mark S. Casini
Affiliation:
DuPont Stine–Haskell Research Center, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE 19711
Kathleen M. Heldreth
Affiliation:
DuPont Stine–Haskell Research Center, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE 19711
Joseph A. Scocas
Affiliation:
DuPont Stine–Haskell Research Center, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE 19711
Scott J. Nissen*
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Bekir Bukun
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey
R. Bradley Lindenmayer
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Dale L. Shaner
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Water Resources, Fort Collins, CO 80526
Philip Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Galen Brunk
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Aminocyclopyrachlor, a newly discovered synthetic auxin herbicide, and its methyl ester, appear to control a number of perennial broadleaf weeds. The potential volatility of this new herbicide and its methyl ester were determined under laboratory conditions and were also compared to dicamba and aminopyralid with the use of enclosed chamber and open-air plant bioassays. Bioassays consisting of visual estimates of epinastic responses and kidney bean and soybean leaf-width measurements were developed to measure vapor release from glass and plastic. Vapor release of aminocyclopyrachlor from glass surfaces was undetectable under laboratory conditions, and no phytotoxic responses were observed when plants were exposed to vapors emanating from various surfaces. Results were similar to those of aminopyralid, indicating the risk of plant injury from vapor movement of aminocyclopyrachlor and aminopyralid was very low. When combined with 1% methylated seed oil, vapor release of aminocyclopyrachlor-methyl ester reached 86% 192 h after application to glass surfaces. Phytotoxic responses of plants exposed to vapors emanating from various surfaces treated with aminocyclopyrachlor-methyl ester were similar to responses to dicamba under enclosed incubation conditions, but were less in outdoor, open-air environments. Studies are needed to understand better the risk of injury to nontarget plants due to vapor movement of aminocyclopyrachlor-methyl ester under field applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, S. M., Clay, S. A., Wrage, L. J., and Matthees, D. 2004. Soybean foliage residues of dicamba and 2,4-D and correlation to application rates and yield. Agron. J. 96:750760.Google Scholar
Behrens, R. and Lueschen, W. E. 1979. Dicamba volatility. Weed Sci. 27:486493.Google Scholar
Claus, J., Turner, R., Armel, G., and Holliday, M. 2008. DuPont aminocyclopyrachlor (proposed common name) (DPX-MAT28/KJM44) herbicide for use in turf, IWC, bare-ground, and brush markets. Pages 654. in Proceedings of the 5th International Weed Science Congress, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Grover, R., Maybank, J., and Yoshida, K. 1972. Droplet and vapor drift of butyl ester and dimethylamine salt of 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 20:320324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied Weed Science. Minneapolis, MN Burgess. 157162.Google Scholar
Salisbury, F. B. and Ross, C. I. 1978. Plant Physiology. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA Wadsworth. 232233.Google Scholar
Sciumbato, A. S., Chandler, J. M., Senseman, S. A., Bovey, R. W., and Smith, K. L. 2004a. Determining exposure to auxin-like herbicides. I. Quantifying injury to cotton and soybean. Weed Technol. 18:11251134.Google Scholar
Sciumbato, A. S., Chandler, J. M., Senseman, S. A., Bovey, R. W., and Smith, K. L. 2004b. Determining exposure to auxin-like herbicides. II. Practical application to quantify volatility. Weed Technol. 18:11351142.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. 331332 and 335–338.Google Scholar
Steckel, L., Chism, C., and Thompson, A. 2005. Cleaning Plant Growth Regulator (PGR) Herbicides Out of Field Sprayers. http://www.utextension.utk.edu/publications/wfiles/W071.pdf. Accessed: July 15, 2009.Google Scholar
Texas Agricultural Code 1984. St. Paul, MN West. Chapter 75.Google Scholar
[USEPA] U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2002. Pesticide industry sales and usage. Washington DC USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs.Google Scholar
van Rensburg, E. and Breeze, V. G. 1990. Uptake and development of phytotoxicity following exposure to vapour of the herbicide 14C 2,4-D butyl by tomato and lettuce plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 30:405414.Google Scholar
Wax, L. M., Knuth, L. A., and Slife, F. W. 1969. Response of soybeans to 2,4-D, dicamba and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:388393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar