Introduction
Waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer] is one of the most common and troublesome weeds in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production systems of the midwestern United States (Van Wychen Reference Van Wychen2019, Reference Van Wychen2020). Amaranthus tuberculatus is well adapted to no-till crop systems and can reduce corn and soybean grain yields by more than 40% if left uncontrolled (Hager et al. Reference Hager, Wax, Stoller and Bollero2002; Steckel and Sprague Reference Steckel and Sprague2004). It has evolved resistance to seven different herbicide groups, including synthetic auxins (2,4-D and dicamba) and inhibitors of enolpyruval shikimate phosphate synthase (glyphosate), acetolactate synthase, photosystem II, protoporphyrinogen oxidase, 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase, and very-long-chain fatty-acid synthesis (Bobadilla et al. Reference Bobadilla, Giacomini, Hager and Tranel2022; Tranel Reference Tranel2021).
Amaranthus tuberculatus emergence commences in mid-May and continues until early August (Hartzler et al. Reference Hartzler, Buhler and Stoltenberg1999). This prolonged emergence window typically requires multiple herbicide applications to manage this species (Hager et al. Reference Hager, Wax, Simmons and Stoller1997). Increased herbicide use has resulted in widespread occurrence of multiple herbicide resistant (MHR) A. tuberculatus populations across the U.S. Midwest (Heap Reference Heap2023). Therefore, A. tuberculatus plants surviving herbicide applications and/or emerging after herbicides have degraded are an increasingly serious problem due to their potential to add large numbers of seeds to the soil seedbank (Hager et al. Reference Hager, Wax, Simmons and Stoller1997; Hartzler et al. Reference Hartzler, Battles and Nordby2004). Furthermore, widespread occurrence of MHR populations increases weed control costs by causing a reversion to tillage and increased herbicide use, hence increasing the risk of adverse environmental impacts (Price et al. Reference Price, Balkcom, Culpepper, Kelton, Nichols and Schomberg2011). Therefore, there is a need to implement nonchemical weed management strategies in soybean–corn rotations of the U.S. Midwest (Tranel Reference Tranel2021)
Chaff lining is a harvest weed seed control (HWSC) method that targets weed seeds during crop harvest (Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Broster, Schwartz-Lazaro, Norsworthy, Davis, Tidemann, Beckie, Lyon, Soni, Neve and Bagavathiannan2018). Several HWSC methods such as chaff carts, narrow-windrow burning, bale direct system, chaff tramlining, chaff lining, and weed seed destruction have been used in Australian small grain production fields to help manage herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds (Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Broster, Schwartz-Lazaro, Norsworthy, Davis, Tidemann, Beckie, Lyon, Soni, Neve and Bagavathiannan2018). About 50% of Australian growers are currently using HWSC methods (Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Ouzman, Newman, Powles and Llewellyn2017). Among these, chaff lining is the most widely used and inexpensive HWSC method (Walsh and Newman Reference Walsh and Newman2007; Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Ouzman, Newman, Powles and Llewellyn2017). The chaff lining method uses a chute attached to the rear of the combine to divert the weed seed–bearing chaff fraction into a narrow row/chaff line (Figure 1). These chaff lines (30- to 50-cm wide) are undisturbed during the following growing seasons, under the assumption that an environment less favorable for germination and seed survival will develop (Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Rayner, Ruttledge and Broster2021).
Figure 1. Chaff lining system attached to John Deere S660 combine concentrating weed seed–bearing soybean chaff in a narrow row.
Crop residue on the soil surface physically suppresses weed seed germination and seedling emergence (Brecke and Shilling Reference Brecke and Shilling1996; Purvis et al. Reference Purvis, Jessop and Lovett1985). Chaff lining creates a thick layer of crop residue that can prolong the physical suppression of weed seedling emergence. Walsh et al. (Reference Walsh, Rayner, Ruttledge and Broster2021) reported more than 80% reduction in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) emergence from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) or barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) chaff.
Despite a high adoption rate of chaff lining in Australian small grain production fields, limited information is available on its potential for implementation in U.S. production fields. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate the usefulness of this tactic for combating MHR A. tuberculatus populations in the midwestern United States. We hypothesized that the mulch effect of crop and weed chaff residue (chaff lining) would suppress A. tuberculatus emergence and growth in the following growing seasons. The specific objectives of this research were: (1) to determine A. tuberculatus seed retention at soybean harvest, (2) to quantify the proportion of combine-collected A. tuberculatus seeds that are concentrated into a chaff line, and (3) to evaluate the effect of soybean chaff line on A. tuberculatus population density and biomass in corn.
Materials and Methods
Experimental Site
Field experiments were conducted during 2020 and 2021 at two sites: the Iowa State University Curtiss Farm, Ames IA (42.004°N, 93.674°W) and a private farm near Roland, IA (42.004°N, 93.674°W). Sites had been planted with corn–soybean rotations for the past 8 yr. Fields were chisel plowed followed by a cultivator before the establishment of the experiments. The soil at the Ames site was a mixture of Canisteo (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, calcareous, mesic Typic Endoaquolls) and Clarion sandy clay loam (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Hapludolls), with pH 7.4 and 4.4% organic matter. Soil at the Roland site was a mixture of Clarion sandy clay loam (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquolls) and Nicollet clay loam soil profile (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Aquic Hapludolls), with pH 6.5 and 2.8% organic matter. Sites had a history of high A. tuberculatus population densities.
Experimental Design
A randomized split-split-plot design with three replications across 2 yr in a soybean–corn rotation was used. The study design included three factors. The first and second factors were established in soybean in 2020, and the third factor was established in corn in 2021 (Figure 2). The first factor consisted of two levels of A. tuberculatus infestation (low and high) in soybean. Two different herbicide treatments were used to achieve two levels of A. tuberculatus infestation to determine the impact of different amounts of crop–weed chaff/residue passing through the combine on the functionality of the chaff lining system(Table 1). The first factor was assigned to the whole plots (9.1-m wide by 48.8-m long). A 3-m-wide alleyway between the whole plots was included to prevent movement of A. tuberculatus seeds from one plot to another during soybean harvest.
Figure 2. Plot layout of the field experiments conducted across 2 yr (2020 to 2021) in a soybean–corn rotation at the Iowa State University Research Farms near Ames, IA, and Boone, IA.
Table 1. List of herbicides applied at the V3 growth stage of soybean to achieve low and high levels of Amaranthus tuberculatus infestation in 2020.
The second factor was established at soybean harvest, when a chaff lining system concentrated A. tuberculatus seed–bearing soybean chaff into a 0.5-m-wide row (chaff line) in the center of each plot. Therefore, the second factor included plot area inside the chaff line (0.5-m wide by 48.8-m long) versus plot area outside the chaff line (8.6-m wide by 48.8-m long).
The third factor, established in the following corn crop in 2021, evaluated the efficacy of corn herbicide treatments in managing A. tuberculatus inside and outside the chaff lines. This factor was assigned to the sub-subplots across the subplots. The sub-subplots inside the chaff line were 0.5-m wide by 12.8-m long, whereas the sub-subplots outside the chaff line were 8.6-m wide and 12.2-m long. A 1.5-m-wide alleyway was left between the sub-subplots to prevent herbicide movement during herbicide applications. The third factor included four different corn herbicide treatments: (1) an untreated control, (2) a preemergence herbicide application, (3) a preemergence herbicide application followed by (fb) a banded postemergence herbicide application, and (4) a preemergence herbicide application fb a broadcast postemergence herbicide application (Table 2). The banded postemergence herbicide application was made only to the area inside the chaff line, whereas the broadcast postemergence herbicide application was made to the entire area (inside and outside the chaff line).
Table 2. List of herbicides applied to manage Amaranthus tuberculatus in corn in 2021. a
a Abbreviations: fb, followed by; PRE, preemergence; POST, postemergence.
b Preemergence herbicides were applied at corn planting and postemergence herbicides were applied at V4 growth stage of corn. The banded postemergence herbicide application was made only to the area inside the chaff line, whereas the broadcast postemergence herbicide application was made to the entire area (inside and outside the chaff line).
Field Operations
A glyphosate-, glufosinate-, and 2,4-D–resistant soybean (‘S20-E3’, NK® Seeds, Syngenta, Greensboro, NC 27419) was planted in the main plots in 2020 at both sites. Soybean was planted in 76-cm-wide rows on May 14, 2020, at both sites. Herbicide applications were made on June 15 and 17, 2020, at the Ames and Roland sites, respectively, when soybean was at the V3 growth stage. All herbicides were applied using a tractor-mounted sprayer (Frontier LS11 series, John Deere, Moline, IL 61265) equipped with Turbo TeeJet® Induction nozzles (TTI110015VS, TeeJet® Technologies, Glendale Heights, IL 60139). The sprayer was calibrated to deliver 140 L ha−1 at 241 kPa. Soybean was harvested with a John Deere S660 combine equipped with the chaff lining system on October 1, 2020, at both sites. The chaff lining system included a commercially made chaff lining kit purchased from WestOZ Boilermaking Services (Cockburn Central, WA 6164, Australia).
A glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant corn (‘PO589AM’, Pioneer®, Johnston, IA 50131) was planted in 2021. Corn was planted in 76-cm-wide rows on April 23, 2021, at both sites. The chaff lines were undisturbed during planting. All herbicides were applied using an ATV-mounted CO2-pressurized boom sprayer equipped with TTI110015VS nozzles calibrated to deliver 140 L ha−1 at 241 kPa. All the preemergence herbicides were applied immediately after planting, and the postemergence herbicides were applied on June 8, 2021, when corn was at the V4 growth stage.
Data Collection
Amaranthus tuberculatus population density and seed production were recorded in 2020 to quantify the infestation levels and percent seed retention at soybean harvest. Amaranthus tuberculatus population density was measured by counting A. tuberculatus plants in ten 0.25-m2 quadrats in each main plot before soybean harvest. Quadrats were placed in a zigzag pattern spaced 5 m apart.
Amaranthus tuberculatus percent seed retention on the mother plant was measured by enclosing two female plants in seed traps in each plot at the seed development stage. Seed traps were custom designed by making an open-ended bag from Noseeum Mosquito Netting Fabric (Online Fabric Store, West Springfield, MA 01089). One end of the bag was secured around the A. tuberculatus stem with a plastic cable tie and the other end of the bag was kept open and tied to three PVC pipes anchored in the ground around the plant. Amaranthus tuberculatus shattered seeds were collected at 1-wk intervals starting August 27 until soybean harvest on October 1, 2020. The bottom of the bag was opened and shattered seeds were poured into a plastic container at each collection time. Seeds collected at each timing were placed in separate paper envelopes. Plants were cut off at the ground immediately before crop harvest and then air-dried for 2 wk. Amaranthus tuberculatus seeds were then threshed by hand-rubbing the inflorescences and cleaned with sieves and an air-column blower (Seedburo® Equipment Company, Des Plaines, IL 60018). Seed samples were weighed, and average seed weight was determined by weighing three subsamples of 1,000 seeds from each sample, and seed production was calculated by dividing the total sample weight with the average seed weight. However, when the total number of seeds in a sample was lower than 1,000, all seeds were counted individually.
The effectiveness of the chaff lining system concentrating A. tuberculatus seeds within the chaff line was quantified at soybean harvest. Threshed residue from the back of the combine was collected in aluminum pans (38 cm by 24 cm) placed inside and outside the chaff line. Four pans were placed inside the chaff line, whereas eight pans were placed outside the chaff line (four on each side of the chaff line). Chaff material from each pan was hand threshed to separate the seeds from the chopped A. tuberculatus inflorescences. Hand-threshed seeds were cleaned with a series of sieves, and finally with an air-column blower. Amaranthus tuberculatus seeds from each sample were counted using the method described previously.
The effect of the soybean chaff line on A. tuberculatus emergence rate, population density, and aboveground biomass in corn was quantified in 2021. Four different herbicide treatments in corn were used to quantify the interaction of soybean chaff line with herbicides for A. tuberculatus control. Amaranthus tuberculatus emergence, inside versus outside the chaff line (sub-subplot), was recorded from two permanently established 0.25-m2 quadrats in each area. Permanent quadrats inside the chaff lines were established with plastic flags and were spaced 3 m apart. Quadrats outside the chaff lines were established parallel to the quadrats inside the chaff line, but 2 m away from the chaff lines. Amaranthus tuberculatus emergence was recorded on a weekly basis from April 28 to July 21, 2021. Emerged seedlings were counted and removed without disturbing the chaff lines at each observation time.
Amaranthus tuberculatus aboveground biomass was recorded for plants growing inside and outside the chaff line in untreated plots to quantify the effect of the soybean chaff line on A. tuberculatus growth. Biomass was collected from a 0.25-m2 quadrat in each area on a weekly basis from June 2 to July 21, 2021. Quadrats were established using the same method described for A. tuberculatus population density, except quadrats were spaced 0.5 m apart. Amaranthus tuberculatus plants within the quadrats were clipped from the base and placed in paper bags. Amaranthus tuberculatus samples were oven-dried at 60 C for 5 d and weighed to determine the dry biomass accumulation.
Statistical Analysis
Data on A. tuberculatus population density, seed production, aboveground biomass, and chaff lining system effectiveness were analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS v. 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC 27513). Experimental site and replication were considered random effects. Herbicide treatments in soybean and corn, the chaff lining system, and their interactions were considered fixed effects in the model. Appropriate degrees of freedom in the model were obtained using the Satterthwaite approximation method (Satterthwaite Reference Satterthwaite1946). Estimated means of response variables for inside versus outside the chaff line area were compared using a two-sample t-test (α = 0.05). Estimated means of A. tuberculatus population density in corn were compared using a Tukey test at a significance level of α = 0.05.
Percent A. tuberculatus seed retention in soybean and A. tuberculatus emergence and aboveground biomass in corn were analyzed in the statistical programming language R (R Core Team 2019) using the R extension package drc (Ritz et al. Reference Ritz, Baty, Streibig and Gerhard2015). A three-parameter log-logistic model was fit using Equation 1 (Ritz et al. Reference Ritz, Baty, Streibig and Gerhard2015) to plot the percent A. tuberculatus seed retention and biomass accumulation over time:
$$y = {d \over {1 + {\rm{exp}}\left\{ {b\left[ {{\rm{log}}\;x\; - \;\log \;e} \right]} \right\}}}$$
In Equation 1, y denotes the percent of seeds retained on the mother plant, and x denotes the time; d denotes the upper limit; e denotes the t 50 (time required to reduce percent of seeds retained on the plant by 50%); and b denotes the relative slope around e. The value of t 10 was calculated using the ED function of the drc package. Similarly, for A. tuberculatus biomass accumulation, y denotes the percent of biomass accumulated, and x denotes time; d denotes the upper limit; e denotes the t 50 (time required to achieve 50% of the maximum biomass); and b denotes the relative slope around e.
Amaranthus tuberculatus emergence over time in corn was analyzed using an event-time approach (Ritz et al. Reference Ritz, Pipper and Streibig2013). A three-parameter log-logistic model was fit using Equation 2:
$$F\left( t \right) = {d \over {1 + {\rm{exp}}\left\{ {b\left[ {\log \left( t \right) - \log \left( {{t_{50}}} \right)} \right]} \right\}}}$$
In equation 2, F(t) denotes the percent of A. tuberculatus that emerged between time 0 (day of corn planting) and time t; d denotes the upper limit (expected maximum emergence); t 50 denotes the time (days after corn planting) to achieve 50% of the maximum emergence (relative to the upper limit, d); and b denotes the slope of emergence curves around t 50. Time to achieve 10% and 90% of the maximum emergence (t 10 and t 90, respectively) were calculated using the ED function of the drc package.
Results and Discussion
Site by treatment interactions for the response variables were not significant; therefore, data were pooled. Soybean herbicide treatments had no significant interaction with chaff line or corn herbicide treatments. However, there was a significant interaction between chaff line and corn herbicide treatments. Therefore, means from chaff line and corn herbicide treatments are presented separately.
Amaranthus tuberculatus Infestation and Seed Retention
The two levels of A. tuberculatus infestation differed in plant population density (P = 0.01) but not in seed production (P = 0.58) and seed retention (P = 0.77) at soybean harvest. The high level of A. tuberculatus infestation had an A. tuberculatus population density of 7 plants m−2, whereas, the A. tuberculatus population density in the low level of infestation was 4 plants m−2. Amaranthus tuberculatus seed production ranged from 110,000 to 130,000 seeds m−2 at soybean harvest.
The percent seed retention over time did not differ between A. tuberculatus infestation levels (Figure 3). Amaranthus tuberculatus seed shattering commenced on September 3 at both sites 4 wk before soybean harvest. Overall, 90% of seeds were retained on the plant until September 19 or about 2 wk before soybean harvest (Figure 3; Table 3). Amaranthus tuberculatus seed retention declined to 70% by soybean harvest on October 1, 2020. Schwartz-Lazaro et al. (Reference Schwartz-Lazaro, Shergill, Evans, Bagavathiannan, Beam, Bish, Bond, Bradley, Curran, Davis, Everman, Flessner, Haring, Jordan and Korres2021) previously reported more than 95% A. tuberculatus seed retention at soybean maturity (mid-September) in the midwestern United States. Parameter estimation by log-logistic model indicated that 50% reduction in A. tuberculatus seed retention would not occur until October 11. These results suggested that a large portion of A. tuberculatus seeds may be retained on the plants until the typical dates of Iowa soybean harvest (USDA-NASS 2020). However, weather events such as windstorms, temperature fluctuations, or rainfall events can increase weed seed shattering before crop harvest (Forcella et al. Reference Forcella, Peterson and Barbour1996; Nielsen and Vigil Reference Nielsen and Vigil2017).
Table 3. Parameter estimates using the log-logistic model (Equation 1) for Amaranthus tuberculatus seed retention on the plant over time in soybean in 2020.
a Parameter b is the relative slope around t 50; t 50 is the time (weeks after the start of the observation period, August 27) required to reduce seed retention on A. tuberculatus plants by 50%; t 10 is the time required to reduce seed retention on A. tuberculatus plants by 10%; and d is the maximum seed retention (%) at the start of the observation period. Values in parentheses represent standard errors of means.
Effectiveness of the Chaff Lining System at Soybean Harvest
The chaff lining system concentrated into the chaff line more than 99% of A. tuberculatus seeds collected during soybean harvest. The number of A. tuberculatus seeds inside the chaff line was 75,000 seeds m−2, while the number of A. tuberculatus seeds outside the chaff line was 200 m−2. However, all A. tuberculatus seeds on the plant may not enter the combine. This can be due to seed-shattering losses associated with combine harvest. Amaranthus tuberculatus seeds can shatter before entering the combine when shaken by the combine header during harvest or seeds may not separate from soybeans and can enter the grain tank instead of the chaff line (Davis Reference Davis2008).
Effect of Soybean Chaff line on Amaranthus tuberculatus in Corn
Amaranthus tuberculatus population density was higher inside the chaff line than outside the chaff line in corn because more than 99% of A. tuberculatus seeds were exiting the combine in the chaff line during soybean harvest (Table 4). Amaranthus tuberculatus population density in corn was 67% higher inside the chaff line (123 plants m−2) than outside the chaff line (40 plants m−2) at 6 wk after planting (WAP) (Table 4). Similarly, A. tuberculatus population density was 76% higher inside the chaff line (213 plants m−2) than outside the chaff line (52 plants m−2) at 12 WAP.
Table 4. Effect of soybean chaff line and corn herbicide programs on Amaranthus tuberculatus population density in corn in 2021. a
a Abbreviations: fb, followed by; PRE, preemergence; POST, postemergence; WAPRE, weeks after PRE; WAPOST, weeks after POST.
b Preemergence herbicides were applied at corn planting and postemergence herbicides were applied at the V4 growth stage of corn. The banded postemergence herbicide application was made only to the area inside the chaff line, whereas the broadcast postemergence herbicide application was made to the entire area (inside and outside the chaff line).
c Treatment means within a column with same letter(s) are not significantly different (Tukey test, α = 0.05).
Amaranthus tuberculatus inside the chaff line took 1 wk longer to achieve 50% of the maximum emergence (t 50) compared with A. tuberculatus outside the chaff line (Table 5). Similarly, A. tuberculatus inside the chaff line emerged (t 10) 5 d later than the A. tuberculatus outside the chaff line and required 63 d to achieve 90% of the maximum emergence inside the chaff line compared with only 54 d outside the chaff line. The delayed A. tuberculatus emergence inside the chaff line was most likely due to lower temperatures during the early growing season (data not shown). Crop residue on the soil surface can decrease both soil temperatures and temperature fluctuations (Teasdale and Mohler Reference Teasdale and Mohler1993; Yang et al. Reference Yang, Reynolds, Drury and Reeb2021), which can reduce A. tuberculatus emergence rate (Guo and Al-Khatib Reference Guo and Al-Khatib2003; Leon et al. Reference Leon, Knapp and Owen2004; Steckel et al. Reference Steckel, Sprague, Stoller and Wax2004).
Table 5. Parameter estimates using the log-logistic model (Equation 2) for the effect of soybean chaff line and corn herbicides on Amaranthus tuberculatus emergence in 2021. a
a Abbreviations: fb, followed by; PRE, preemergence; POST, postemergence.
b Preemergence herbicides were applied at corn planting and postemergence herbicides were applied at the V4 growth stage of corn. The banded postemergence herbicide application was made only to the area inside the chaff line, whereas the broadcast postemergence herbicide application was made to the entire area (inside and outside the chaff line).
c Parameter b is the relative slope around t 50; t 50 is the time (days after corn planting) required to achieve 50% of the maximum emergence (d); t 10 and t 90 are the time required to achieve 10% and 90% of the maximum emergence, respectively; and d is the maximum emergence (%) at the end of the observation period. Values in parentheses represent standard errors of means.
Amaranthus tuberculatus aboveground biomass was lower inside the chaff line than outside the chaff line at 12 WAP (Table 6). However, A. tuberculatus biomass accumulation was slower outside the chaff line during the early growing season. Amaranthus tuberculatus inside the chaff line accumulated 10% of the maximum biomass 1 wk earlier than A. tuberculatus outside the chaff line (Table 6). Nonetheless, the trend was reversed over time, and A. tuberculatus inside the chaff line accumulated 90% of the maximum biomass 1 wk later than outside the chaff line (Table 6). Wilson et al. (Reference Wilson, Wright, Brain, Clements and Stephens1995) found that field violet (Viola arvensis Murray) population density increased the biomass until 10 wk after emergence. However, biomass after 10 wk of emergence did not increase with population density due to intraspecific competition.
Table 6. Parameter estimates using the log-logistic model (Equation 1) for the effect of soybean chaff line on Amaranthus tuberculatus aboveground biomass accumulation in corn in 2021.
a Parameter b is the relative slope around t 50; t 50 is the time (days after corn planting) required to achieve 50% of the maximum biomass (d); t 10 and t 90 are the time required to achieve 10% and 90% of the maximum biomass, respectively; and d is the maximum biomass (g m−2) accumulated at the end of observation period. Values in parentheses represent standard errors of means.
Interaction Effects of the Chaff Line and Corn Herbicides on Amaranthus tuberculatus
Application of either preemergence-only or preemergence fb postemergence herbicides inside or outside the chaff line reduced A. tuberculatus population density by ≥90% compared with the untreated control at 6 WAP (Table 4). Amaranthus tuberculatus population density in herbicide treatments did not differ between inside and outside the chaff line until 6 WAP. However, at 12 WAP, preemergence-only herbicides had higher A. tuberculatus population density inside the chaff line than outside the chaff line (Table 5). The difference in A. tuberculatus population density at 12 WAP was eliminated by a banded postemergence herbicide application over the chaff line area only. This indicates that the additional postemergence herbicide treatment on the chaff line was needed due to higher A. tuberculatus seed population density and a high amount of soybean chaff inside the chaff line, which could have intercepted parts of the preemergence herbicides. High weed population density can decrease the net amount of preemergence herbicides absorbed by individual plants (Hoffman and Lavy Reference Hoffman and Lavy1978; Winkle et al. Reference Winkle, Leavitt and Burnside1981). Ghadiri et al. (Reference Ghadiri, Shea and Wicks1984) reported wheat residue intercepted about 60% of atrazine applied on the surface. The intercepted herbicides can be lost through rainfall wash-off, biodegradation, and volatilization (Locke and Bryson Reference Locke and Bryson1997).
Addition of a preemergence herbicide treatment influenced A. tuberculatus emergence rate more inside the chaff line than outside the chaff line (Table 6). Amaranthus tuberculatus located in the chaff line with the preemergence herbicide treatment took 1 wk longer to achieve 50% of the maximum emergence (t 50) compared with the untreated control, whereas, A. tuberculatus located outside the chaff line took a similar amount of time with or without the preemergence herbicide treatment to achieve 50% of the maximum emergence (t 50). A similar pattern was observed for the time required to achieve 10% and 90% of the maximum A. tuberculatus emergence. This delayed emergence inside the chaff line was likely due to a cumulative effect from preemergence herbicides and soybean chaff residue (Teasdale et al. Reference Teasdale, Shelton, Sadeghi and Isensee2003).
Management Implications
The inclusion of chaff lining in current weed management programs in soybean has the potential to help manage the A. tuberculatus seedbank in soybean–corn rotations in the U.S. Midwest. Although A. tuberculatus population density in corn was higher inside the chaff line, the rate of emergence and overall biomass accumulation was lower. This may be particularly important, as the competitiveness of weeds in a crop is determined by the time of emergence and population density–dependent biomass accumulation (Aldrich Reference Aldrich1987). The delayed A. tuberculatus emergence inside the chaff line would likely result in a competitive disadvantage with the crop (Hartzler et al. Reference Hartzler, Battles and Nordby2004). A high weed seed population density in the chaff line is more likely to be consumed by vertebrates and is more vulnerable to microbial decay than weed seeds in low-population densities (Baraibar et al. Reference Baraibar, Daedlow, De Mol and Gerowitt2011). The efficacy of preemergence herbicides inside the chaff line declined later in the season, likely due to high population density (Hoffman and Lavy Reference Hoffman and Lavy1978; Winkle et al. Reference Winkle, Leavitt and Burnside1981). A postemergence herbicide treatment with multiple effective sites of action may be needed to achieve season-long A. tuberculatus control in the chaff lines. The preemergence-only herbicide treatment provided season-long control outside the chaff line, resulting in lower herbicide use overall. Future research should investigate the effect of soybean chaff lining on A. tuberculatus seed viability and microbial seed decay. Studies focused on managing A. tuberculatus inside the chaff lines using alternative weed control tactics can help promote the adoption of chaff lining in soybean–corn rotations.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Iowa Soybean Association and United Soybean Board for providing funding to support this research. Technical help in field operations provided by Damian Franzenburg, Iththiphonh Macvilay, Edward Dearden, Ryan Hamberg, Alexis Meadows, and Austin Schleich over the 2-yr period of the research is greatly appreciated. The authors thank Michael J. Walsh for helpful comments on the experimental setup and Micheal D. K. Owen for critical and constructive review that helped improve the article. No conflicts of interest have been declared.
Open access
