Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:49:39.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transformations of the Herbicide N-(1,1-dimethylpropynyl)-3,5-dichlorobenzamide in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Roy Y. Yih
Affiliation:
Rohm and Haas Company, Research Laboratories, Spring House, Pennsylvania
Colin Swithenbank
Affiliation:
Rohm and Haas Company, Research Laboratories, Spring House, Pennsylvania
D. Harold McRae
Affiliation:
Rohm and Haas Company, Research Laboratories, Spring House, Pennsylvania

Abstract

Transformation of N-(1,1-dimethylpropynyl)-3,5-dichlorobenzamide (compound I) in soil occurs readily and two products are produced, initial cyclization giving 2-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-5-methyleneoxazoline (compound II) followed by subsequent hydrolysis to N-(1,1-dimethylacetonyl)-3,5-dichlorobenzamide (compound III). These transformations can be brought about in vitro, the first step by means of acid or base, and the second by extended treatment with acid. The rate of cyclization and hydrolysis of compound I varies directly with soil temperature, being rapid at high temperature (37 C) and very slow at low temperature (5 C). The rate of chemical change of compound I in soil is influenced to a much greater degree by temperature than by soil moisture content. The effect of soil type on transformation of compound I was studied and compounds II and III were present in five of the six soils examined. The herbicidal activity of compounds II and III was negligible in comparison to compound I.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Altman, C. D. and Stadelbacher, G. J. 1970. Weed control in newly planted strawberries. Proc. No. E. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:209212.Google Scholar
2. Braden, D. A. and Cialone, J. C. 1970. Weed control in lettuce and endive. Proc. No. E. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:348354.Google Scholar
3. Burt, E. O. and Gerhold, N. R. 1970. Pao Annua control in bermuda turf with Kerb. Proc. So. Weed Sci. Soc. 23: In press.Google Scholar
4. Butler, F. E. 1961. Determination of tritium in water and urine-liquid scintillation counting and rate-of-drift determination. Anal. Chem. 33:409414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1964. The Autoradiography of Plant Materials. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Manual 35. 143 p.Google Scholar
6. Duke, W. B. 1969. RH-315 for quackgrass control in established alfalfa. Proc. No. E. Weed Contr. Conf. (Supple.) 23:26.Google Scholar
7. Duke, W. B. 1970. Effects of RH-315 on quackgrass and established alfalfa. Proc. No. E. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:220226.Google Scholar
8. Easton, N. R., Cassidy, D. R., and Dillard, R. D. 1965. Acetylenic amines. XII. Some new reactions of acylaminoacetylenes. J. Org. Chem. 30:30843088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ilnicki, R. D. and Hist, L. P. 1969. Weed control in dormant alfalfa. Proc. No. E. Weed Contr. Conf. 23:222226.Google Scholar
10. Kaufman, D. D., Plimmer, J. R., Kearney, P. C., Blake, J., and Guardia, F. S. 1968. Chemical versus microbial decomposition of amitrole in soil. Weed Sci. 16:266272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lavalleye, M., Agamalian, H., Lange, A., and Brendler, R. 1969. RH-315, a new herbicide with potential for weed control in lettuce. California Agr. 23(4):1415.Google Scholar
12. Parochetti, J. V. 1969. Chickweed control in dormant alfalfa with paraquat, diquat and experimental herbicides. Proc. No. E. Weed Contr. Conf. 23:206212.Google Scholar
13. Viste, K. L., Crovetti, A. J., and Horrom, B. W. 1970. Dimethylpropynylbenzamides: A new group of herbicides. Science 167:280281.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Viste, K. L. and Sanborn, J. M. 1970. Control of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) in alfalfa. RH-315 (Kerb). No. E. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:227231.Google Scholar