Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:55:31.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Cotton to Diuron, Fluometuron, Norea, and Prometryne

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Y. Eshel
Y. Eshel*
Affiliation:
Department of Field and Vegetable Crops, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The phytotoxicity of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron), 1,1-dimethyl-3-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)urea (fluometuron), 3-(hexahydro-4,7-,methanoindan-5-yl)-1,1-dimethylurea (norea), and 2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine (prometryne) to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L., var. Acala 4-42) was compared. Warburg experiments indicated that fluometuron and norea inhibited photosynthesis in isolated leaf disks to a much smaller extent than did diuron and prometryne. When the plants were grown in solution culture, diuron and prometryne were much more phytotoxic to cotton than fluometuron and norea, whereas when grown in soil, prometryne was the least phytotoxic, followed by norea, fluometuron, and diuron. Results of experiments on root vs. shoot uptake showed that all four herbicides entered the cotton seedlings through the roots, and no injury occurred to cotton when the compounds were applied to the shoot zone only. Norea and fluometuron were much more leachable than prometryne and diuron. These results indicate that depth protection in the soil, in addition to translocation and metabolism, might account partially for the tolerance of cotton to preemergence application of the tested herbicides.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 492 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M., Uribe, E. G. and Zweig, G. 1961. Effect of monuron on C14O2 fixation by red kidney bean leaves. Weeds 9:575–579.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M., Zweig, G. and Mason, G. W. 1960. The effect of certain triazines on C14O2 fixation in red kidney beans. Weeds 8:448–451.Google Scholar
3. Bayer, D. W. and Yamaguchi, S. 1965. Absorption and distribution of diuron-C14 . Weeds 13:232–235.Google Scholar
4. Cooke, A. R. 1956. A possible mechanism of action of the urea type herbicides. Weeds 4:397–398.Google Scholar
5. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1960. Absorption of herbicides by roots. Amer. J. Bot. 47:248–255.Google Scholar
6. Eshel, Y. 1967. Mode of action of 1-(3-chloro-4-methylphenyl)-3-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. Weeds 15:147–149.Google Scholar
7. Eshel, Y. and Prendeville, G. N. 1967. A technique for studying root vs. shoot uptake of soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 7:242–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fang, S. C., Freed, V. H., Johnson, R. H. and Coffee, D. R. 1955. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of radioactive 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylure (CMU) by bean plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 3:400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Geissbühler, H., Haselbach, C., Aebi, H. and Ebner, L. 1963. The fate of N1-(4-chlorophenoxy)-phenyl-N,N-dimethylurea (C-1983) in soils and plants. III. Breakdown in soils and plants. Weed Res. 3:277–297.Google Scholar
10. Gilson, W. E. 1963. Differential respirometer of simplified and improved design. Science 141:531–532.Google Scholar
11. Gysin, H. and Knüsli, E. 1960. Chemistry and herbicidal properties of triazine derivatives, p. 289–385. In Metcalf, R. L. (ed.) Advances in Pest Control Research. Vol. III. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
12. Harris, C. I. 1967. Movement of herbicides in soil. Weeds 15:214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hilton, J. L., Jansen, L. L. and Hull, H. M. 1963. Mechanisms of herbicide action. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 14:353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 347. 32 p.Google Scholar
15. Hogue, E. J. and Warren, G. F. 1968. Selectivity of linuron on tomato and parsnip. Weed Sci. 16:51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Minshall, W. H. 1957. Influence of light on the effect of 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea on plants. Weeds 5:29–33.Google Scholar
17. Montgomery, M. and Freed, V. H. 1964. Metabolism of triazine herbicides by plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:11–14.Google Scholar
18. Moreland, D. W., Genter, W. A., Hilton, J. L. and Hill, K. L. 1959. Studies on the mechanism of herbicidal action of 2-chloro-4,6-bis (ethylamino)-s-triazine. Plant Physiol. 34:432–435.Google Scholar
19. Moreland, D. E. and Hill, K. L. 1962. Interference of herbicides with the Hill reaction of isolated chloroplasts. Weeds 10:229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Moreland, D. E. and Hill, K. L. 1963. Inhibition of photochemical activity of isolated chloroplasts by polycyclic ureas. Weeds 11:284–287.Google Scholar
21. Pardee, A. B. 1949. Measurement of oxygen uptake under controlled pressure of carbon dioxide. J. Biol. Chem. 179:1085–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Rodgers, E. G. 1968. Leaching of seven s-triazines. Weed Sci. 16:117–120.Google Scholar
23. Rogers, R. L. and Funderburk, H. H. Jr. 1968. Physiological aspects of fluometuron in cotton and cucumber. J. Agr. Food Chem. 16:434–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Sikka, H. C. and Davis, D. E. 1968. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of prometryne in cotton and soybean. Weed Sci. 16:474–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Sikka, H. C. and Parmer, D. 1968. Physiological effects of fluometuron on some unicellular algae. Weed Sci. 16:296–299.Google Scholar
26. Smith, J. W. and Sheets, T. J. 1967. Uptake, distribution and metabolism of monuron and diuron by several plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 15:577–581.Google Scholar
27. Swanson, C. R. and Swanson, H. R. 1968. Metabolic fate of monuron and diuron in isolated leaf discs. Weed Sci. 16:137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Upchurch, R. P. 1966. Behavior of herbicides in soils. Residue Rev. 16:46–85.Google Scholar
29. Wessels, J. S. C. and van der Veen, R. 1956. The action of some derivatives of phenylurethan and 3-phenyl-1,1-dimethylurea on the Hill reaction. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 19:548–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Whitenberg, D. C. 1965. Fate of prometryne in cotton plants. Weeds 13:68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar