Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:18:50.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three Year Effects of Herbaceous Weed Control in a Sycamore Plantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. H. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
School of Forest Resources, Univ. of Ga., Athens, GA 30602
R. F. Richards
Affiliation:
Geigy Agr. Chem., Div. of Ciba-Geigy Corp., Gainesville, GA 30501
C. W. Selden
Affiliation:
Champion International, Atlanta, GA 30342
J. T. May
Affiliation:
School of Forest Resources, Univ. of Ga., Athens, GA 30602

Abstract

Screening studies initiated in 1969 to determine the effectiveness and selectivity of herbicides for herbaceous weed control during the first growing season in American sycamore (Plantanus occidentalis L.) plantations indicated that simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine], atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6- (isopropylamino)-s-triazine], and dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) had the desired properties at economically feasible use rates. To further evaluate these herbicides and ametryne [2-(ethylamino)-4-(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine], permanent plots were established in a sycamore plantation in 1970. Weed control obtained from a single herbicide application in the spring after planting seedlings in the winter has resulted in increased height, diameter, and volume growth of the sycamore for at least three growing seasons. No serious phytotoxicity on the crop species was noted with application rates from 4.5 to 9.0 kg/ha of the s-triazines alone or from 5.6 kg/ha of dalapon in combination with the lower rate of simazine and atrazine.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Erdmann, G.G. 1967. Chemical weed control increases survival and growth in hardwood plantings. North Cent. For. Exp. Sta., For. Serv., U.S.D.A. Res. Note NC-34, 4 pp.Google Scholar
2. Erdmann, G.G. and Green, L. 1967. Chemical weed control in a two-year-old walnut planting. North Cent. For. Exp. Sta., For. Serv., U.S.D.A. Res. Note NC-28, 4 pp.Google Scholar
3. Fitzgerald, C.H., Peevy, F.A., and Fender, D.E. 1973. Rehabilitation of forest land, the southern region. Jour. of For. 71:3:148153.Google Scholar
4. McKnight, J.S. 1970. Planting cottonwood cuttings for timber production in the south. Sou. For. Exp. Sta., For. Serv., U.S.D.A., Res. Pap. S.O. 60, 17 pp.Google Scholar