Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:21:09.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature Factors Limiting the Spread of Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) and Torpedograss (Panicum repens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John W. Wilcut ,
Bryan Truelove ,
Donald E. Davis  and
John C. Williams
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Tidewater Agric. Exp. Stn., 6321 Holland Road, P.O. Box 7219, Suffolk, VA 23437
Bryan Truelove
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Microbiol., Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Donald E. Davis
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Microbiol., Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
John C. Williams
Affiliation:
Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. J. Ser. No. 18-861158
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse, growth chamber, and field studies were conducted to determine effects of temperature on the potential of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica L. Beauv. # IMPCY) and torpedograss (Panicum repens L. # PANRE) to spread beyond present distribution in the Lower Coastal Plains of Southeastern United States. Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHA] was included in the study for comparative purposes. Growth of each species was greater with day/night temperature regimes of 30/25 C than with 27/22 or 24/18 C. Apical six-node-long rhizome fragments of all three species were killed by a 24-h exposure to −4.5 C. Johnsongrass produced at least three to five times more dry matter than either cogongrass or torpedograss. Order of interspecific competitiveness under 30/25, 27/22, and 24/18 C day/night temperature regimes was johnsongrass > torpedograss > cogongrass. After 2 yr, johnsongrass and torpedograss competition reduced common bermudagrass [Cyndon dactylon (L.) Pers. # CYNDA] yield by 99 and 37%, respectively, while cogongrass competition did not affect common bermudagrass yield. It is concluded that cogongrass and torpedograss are unlikely to spread into more temperate regions of the United States. However, both species are apt to become even more widespread and troublesome in the Lower Coastal Plains of Southeastern United States.

Keywords

Competitiongrowth analysisCynodon dactylonSorghum helepenseCYNDAIMPCYPANRESORHA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 49 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, E. M., Case, A. A., Edds, G., Fowler, M., and Osweiler, G. 1979. The sky is blue, the plant is green, the horse is dead. Equus 21:45–53.Google Scholar
2. Baird, D. D., Urrutia, V. M., and Tucker, D.P.H. 1983. Management systems with glyphosate on torpedograss in citrus. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:201–209.Google Scholar
3. Baird, D. D., Baker, G. E., Brown, H. F., and Urrutia, V. M. 1983. Aquatic weed control with glyphosate in south Florida. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:430–435.Google Scholar
4. Burt, E. O. 1980. Glyphosate for torpedograss and bermudagrass control. Proc. 3rd Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf. 3:257–262.Google Scholar
5. Dickens, R. 1974. Cogongrass in Alabama after sixty years. Weed Sci. 22:177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dickens, R. and Moore, G. M. 1974. Effects of light, temperature, KNO3, and storage on germination of cogongrass. Agron. J. 66:187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Elmore, C. D. 1986. Weed survey—southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:136–158.Google Scholar
8. Flint, E. P. and Patterson, D. T. 1983. Interference and temperature effects on growth in soybean (Glycine max) and associated C3 and C4 weeds. Weed Sci. 31:193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Flint, E. P., Patterson, D. T., and Beyers, J. L. 1983. Interference and temperature effects on growth of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 31:892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Flint, E. P., Patterson, D. T., Mortensen, D. A., Riechers, G. H., and Beyers, J. L. 1984. Temperature effects on growth and leaf production in three weed species. Weed Sci. 32:655–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Serv. Circ. No. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
12. Hubbard, C. E. 1944. Imperata cylindrica. Taxonomy, Distribution, Economic Significance, and Control. Imp. Agric. Bur., Joint Publ. No, 7. Imp. Bur. Pastures and Forage Crops, Aberystwyth, Wales. Great Britain.Google Scholar
13. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. B., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI. 609 pp.Google Scholar
14. Hull, R. J. 1970. Germination control of johnsongrass rhizome buds. Weed Sci. 18:118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Little, T. M. and Hills, F. J. 1978. Agricultural Experimentation, Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 350 pp.Google Scholar
16. McWhorter, C. G. 1971. Introduction and spread of johnsongrass in the United States. Weed Sci. 10:496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. McWhorter, C. G. 1972. Factors affecting johnsongrass rhizome production and germination. Weed Sci. 20:41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Patterson, D. T. 1980. Shading effects on growth and partitioning of plant biomass in cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) from shaded and exposed habitats. Weed Sci. 28:735–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Patterson, D. T., Flint, E. P., and Dickens, R. Effects of temperature, photoperiod, and population source on the growth of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica). Weed Sci. 28:505–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Patterson, D. T., Musser, R. L., Flint, E. P., and Eplee, R. E. 1982. Temperature responses and potential for spread of witchweed (Striga lutea) in the United States. Weed Sci. 30:87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Peng, S. Y. 1984. The Biology and Control of Weeds in Sugarcane. Developments in Crop Science (4). Elsevier Science, New York. 337 pp.Google Scholar
22. Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. S. 1984. Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 265 pp.Google Scholar
23. Smith, H. 1982. Height quality, photoreception, and plant strategy. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33:481–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar
25. Stoller, E. W. 1973. Effect of minimum soil temperatures on differential distribution of (Cyperus rotundus) and (C. esculentus) in the United States. Weed Res. 13:209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Stoller, E. W. 1977. Differential cold tolerance of quackgrass and johnsongrass rhizomes. Weed Sci: 25:348–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Tarver, D. P., Rogers, J. A., and Mahler, M. J. 1978. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Florida. Fla. Dep. Nat. Resour. Bur. Aquat. Plant Res. Conf. Tallahassee, FL. 127 pp.Google Scholar
28. Zimdahl, R. L. 1983. Where are the principal exotic weed pests? Pages 183–217 in Wilson, C. L. and Graham, C. L., eds. Exotic Plant Pests and North American Agriculture. Acacemic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar