Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:40:27.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systems of Weed Control for Peanuts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. W. Hauser
Affiliation:
U. S. Dep. of Agr., Coastal Plain Exp. Sta., Tifton, GA. 31794
S. R. Cecil
Affiliation:
Georgia Station, Experiment, GA. 30212
C. C. Dowler
Affiliation:
U. S. Dep. of Agr., Coastal Plain Exp. Sta., Tifton, GA. 31794

Abstract

Systems of weed control composed of (a) herbicides only, (b) herbicides plus cultivation, or (c) cultivation only were devised. The most effective systems, involving herbicide sequences plus one “non-dirting” layby cultivation, controlled twelve troublesome species of weeds with acceptable yields of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). On Greenville sandy clay loam, a particularly effective and economical system of weed control consisted of (a) N-butyl-N-ethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-p-toluidine (benefin) used as a preplanting incorporated treatment, then (b) S-propyl dipropylthiocarbamate (vernolate) either incorporated into the soil before planting or injected at planting, and finally, (c) a layby cultivation 5 to 6 weeks after planting. A similarly effective system on Tifton loamy sand involved vernolate injected at planting, 2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (dinoseb) at “cracking”, and 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butyric acid (2,4-DB) as a postemergence treatment followed by the layby cultivation. The “non-dirting” layby cultivation, averaged over both years and herbicide sequences, significantly increased yields of peanuts on both soil types. None of the systems of weed control caused consistent differences in market grade, average weight per seed, germination, or organoleptic quality of the peanuts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Derting, C. W. 1969. Performance of preemergence herbicide combinations on corn, soybeans and peanuts. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:170174.Google Scholar
2. Hauser, E. W. and Dowler, C. C. 1971. Control of Florida beggarweed in peanuts. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:137.Google Scholar
3. Hauser, E. W. and Parham, S. A. 1964. Herbicide mixtures for weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.), 1961–63. Weed Res. 4:338350.Google Scholar
4. Garren, K. H. 1959. The stem rot of peanuts and its control. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 144. 29 p.Google Scholar
5. Matthiesen, R. and Santelmann, P. W. 1971. Influence of postemergence herbicides on peanut development. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:131133.Google Scholar
6. Rud, O. E. 1968. The performance of preplant and early postemergence treatment combinations for weed control in peanuts. Proc. S. Weed Conf. 21:117121.Google Scholar