Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:15:29.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suppression of weed occurrence in a five-year corn–earthworm coculture system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2020

Tao Li ,
Jiequn Fan ,
Zhenguan Qian ,
Guohui Yuan ,
Dandan Meng ,
Shuiliang Guo Open the ORCID record for Shuiliang Guo [Opens in a new window]  and
Weiguang Lv
Tao Li
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
Jiequn Fan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
Zhenguan Qian
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
Guohui Yuan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
Dandan Meng
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
Shuiliang Guo*
Affiliation:
Professor, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
Weiguang Lv*
Affiliation:
Professor, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
*
Authors for correspondence: Weiguang Lv, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 1000 Jinqi Road, Fengxian District, Shanghai 201403, China. (Email: [email protected]); and Shuiliang Guo, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200234, China. (Email: [email protected])
Authors for correspondence: Weiguang Lv, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 1000 Jinqi Road, Fengxian District, Shanghai 201403, China. (Email: [email protected]); and Shuiliang Guo, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200234, China. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of a corn–earthworm coculture (CE) system is an eco-agricultural technology that has been gradually extended due to its high economic output and diverse ecological benefits for urban agriculture in China. However, the effect of CE on weed occurrence has received little attention. A 5-yr successive experiment (2015 to 2019) was conducted to compare weed occurrence in CE and a corn (Zea mays L.) monoculture (CM). The results show that CE significantly decreased weed diversity, the dominance index, total weed density, and biomass, but increased the weed evenness index. The 5-yr mean number of weed species per plot was 8.4 in CE and 10.7 in CM. Compared with those in CM, the 5-yr mean density and biomass of total weeds in CE decreased by 59.2% and 66.6%, respectively. The effect of CE on weed occurrence was species specific. The mean density of large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.], green foxtail [Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv.], goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.], and common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) in CE decreased by 94.5%, 78.1%, 75.0%, and 45.8%, whereas the mean biomass decreased by 96.2%, 80.8%, 76.9%, and 41.4%, respectively. Our study suggests that the use of CE could suppress weed occurrence and reduce herbicide inputs in agriculture.

Keywords

BiodiversityPheretima guillelmiseed predationsoil seedbankweed community.
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , March 2021 , pp. 230 - 237
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Associate Editor: Te-Ming Paul Tseng, Mississippi State University

References

Aira, M, Piearce, TG (2009) The earthworm Lumbricus terrestris favours the establishment of Lolium perenne over Agrostis capillaris seedlings through seed consumption and burial. Appl Soil Ecol 41:360–363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amador, JA, Avizinis, EJ (2013) Response of nitrous oxide flux to addition of anecic earthworms to an agricultural field. Open J Soil Sci 3:100–106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, ZH, Gui, LI, Tian-shou, S (2000) Influence of the earthworm Pheretima guillelmi on soil microbial biomass and activity. Acta Ecol Sin 20:8–12 Google Scholar
Berg, H (2002) Rice monoculture and integrated rice-fish farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam—economic and ecological considerations. Ecol Econ 41:95–107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, H, Tam, NT (2018) Decreased use of pesticides for increased yields of rice and fish—options for sustainable food production in the Mekong Delta. Sci Total Environ 619–620:319–327 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertrand, M, Barot, S, Blouin, M, Whalen, J, de Oliveira, T, Roger-Estrade, J (2015) Earthworm services for cropping systems: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:553–567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohlen, PJ, Parmelee, RW, Blair, JM, Edwards, CA, Stinner, BR (1995) Efficacy of methods for manipulating earthworm populations in large-scale field experiments in agroecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 27:993–999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, KY (2001) An overview of some tillage impacts on earthworm population abundance and diversity—implications for functioning in soils. Soil Tillage Res 57:179–191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2010) The role of seed ecology in improving weed management strategies in the tropics. Adv Agron 105:221–262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of the PPRC (2010) Pharmacopoeia of People’s Republic of China. Volume 1. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House. Pp 116–117 Google Scholar
Decaëns, T, Mariani, L, Betancourt, N, Jiménez, JJ (2003) Seed dispersion by surface casting activities of earthworms in Colombian grasslands. Acta Oecologica 24:175–185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, AM, Blossey, B, Richardson, JB (2017) Invasive earthworms change nutrient availability and uptake by forest understory plants. Plant Soil 421:175–190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, CA, Bohlen, PJ (1996) Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. 3rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall. 438 pGoogle Scholar
Eisenhauer, N, Marhan, S, Scheu, S (2008) Assessment of anecic behavior in selected earthworm species: effects on wheat seed burial, seedling establishment, wheat growth and litter incorporation. Appl Soil Ecol 38:79–82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhauer, N, Scheu, S (2008) Earthworms as drivers of the competition between grasses and legumes. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2650–2659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhauer, N, Schuy, M, Butenschoen, O, Scheu, S (2009) Direct and indirect effects of endogeic earthworms on plant seeds. Pedobiologia (Jena) 52:151–162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmer, WH (2009) Influence of earthworm activity on soil microbes and soilborne diseases of vegetables. Plant Dis 93:175–179 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forey, E, Barot, S, Decaëns, T, Langlois, E, Laossi, KR, Margerie, P, Scheu, S, Eisenhauer, N (2011) Importance of earthworm-seed interactions for the composition and structure of plant communities: a review. Acta Oecologica 37:594–603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazão, J, de Goede, RGM, Brussaard, L, Faber, JH, Groot, JCJ, Pulleman, MM (2017) Earthworm communities in arable fields and restored field margins, as related to management practices and surrounding landscape diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 248:1–8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frelich, LE, Hale, CM, Scheu, S, Holdsworth, AR, Heneghan, L, Bohlen, PJ, Reich, PB (2006) Earthworm invasion into previously earthworm-free temperate and boreal forests. Biol Invasions 8:1235–1245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Pérez, JA, Alarcón-Gutiérrez, E, Perroni, Y, Barois, I (2014) Earthworm communities and soil properties in shaded coffee plantations with and without application of glyphosate. Appl Soil Ecol 83:230–237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, JD (1983) The activities of earthworms and the fates of seeds. Pages 107–122 in Satchell JE, ed. Earthworm Ecology from Darwin to Vermiculture. London: Chapman and Hall Google Scholar
Hauser, S (1993) Distribution and activity of earthworms and contribution to nutrient recycling in alley cropping. Biol Fertil Soils 15:16–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B, Villumsen, G (2018) Environmental aspects of natural resource intensive development: the case of agriculture. Innov Dev 8:167–188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, CG, Lawton, JH, Shachak, M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kladivko, EJ, Akhouri, NM, Weesies, G (1997) Earthworm populations and species distributions under no-till and conventional tillage in Indiana and Illinois. Soil Biol Biochem 29:613–615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laossi, KR, Noguera, DC, Barot, S (2010) Earthworm-mediated maternal effects on seed germination and seedling growth in three annual plants. Soil Biol Biochem 42:319–323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laossi, KR, Noguera, DC, Bartolomé-Lasa, A, Mathieu, J, Blouin, M, Barot, S (2009) Effects of an endogeic and an anecic earthworm on the competition between four annual plants and their relative fecundity. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1668–1673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y, Wang, S, Lu, M, Zhang, Z, Chen, M, Li, S, Cao, R (2019) Rhizosphere interactions between earthworms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase nutrient availability and plant growth in the desertification soils. Soil Tillage Res 186:146–151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, NA (1982) The effect of herbicides used on asparagus on the growth rate of the earthworm Allolobophora caliginosa. Pages 328–331 in Proceedings of the 35th New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference. Auckland: New Zealand Plant Protection SocietyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, PA, Parton, WJ, Power, AG, Swift, MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McTavish, MJ, Murphy, SD (2020) Assessing the relative importance of earthworms as granivores under field conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 147: 103428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, PM, Carter, MR (1999) Impact of crop management factors in conservation tillage farming on earthworm density, age structure and species abundance in south-eastern Australia. Soil Tillage Res 50:1–10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milcu, A, Schumacher, J, Scheu, S (2006) Earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris) affect plant seedling recruitment and microhabitat heterogeneity. Funct Ecol 20:261–268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milleret, R, Le Bayon, RC, Lamy, F, Gobat, JM, Boivin, P (2009) Impact of roots, mycorrhizas and earthworms on soil physical properties as assessed by shrinkage analysis. J Hydrol 373:499–507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurhidayati, N, Ali, U, Murwani, I (2016) Yield and quality of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) under organic growing media using vermicompost and earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus inoculation. Agric Sci Procedia 11:5–13 Google Scholar
Piearce, TG, Lee, KE (1987) Earthworms, their ecology and relationships with soils and land use. J Appl Ecol 24:334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piearce, TG, Roggero, N, Tipping, R (1994) Earthworms and seeds. J Biol Educ 28:195–202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, EC (1967) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol 15:177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizl, V (1988) Interactions between earthworms and herbicides. I. Toxicity of some herbicides to earthworms in laboratory tests. Pedobiologia (Jena) 32:227–232 Google Scholar
Powles, SB, Preston, C, Bryan, IB, Jutsum, AR (1996) Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Adv Agron 58:57–93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, DM, Jiang, JZ (2004) Effect of 4% Nicosulfuron suspending agent on control of the weeds of spring and summer corn field in Shanghai. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai 20:123–125Google Scholar
Ren, Q, Zhao, J (2011) Sanxing town of Chongming: earthworms’ key role in a three-dimensional agricultural chain. Friends of Farmers 2:43. ChineseGoogle Scholar
Regnier, E, Harrison, SK, Liu, J, Schmoll, JT, Edwards, CA, Arancon, N, Holloman, C (2008) Impact of an exotic earthworm on seed dispersal of an indigenous US weed. J Appl Ecol 45:1621–1629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheu, S (2003) Effects of earthworms on plant growth: patterns and perspectives. Pedobiologia (Jena) 47:846–856 Google Scholar
Schmidt, O (2001) Time-limited soil sorting for long-term monitoring of earthworm populations. Pedobiologia (Jena) 45:69–83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanghai Academy of Sciences (1999) Flora of China. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology PressGoogle Scholar
Shannon, CE, Weaver, W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. P 5 Google Scholar
Shumway, DL, Koide, RT (1994) Seed preferences of Lumbricus terrestris L. Appl Soil Ecol 1:11–15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RG, Gross, KL, Januchowski, S (2005) Earthworms and weed seed distribution in annual crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:363–367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springett, JA, Gray, RAJ (1992) Effect of repeated low doses of biocides on the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa in laboratory culture. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1739–1744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinner, BR, Mccartney, DA, Blair, JM, Parmelee, RW, Allen, MF (1997) Earthworm effects on crop and weed biomass, and N content in organic and inorganic fertilized agroecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 29:423–426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subler, S, Baranski, CM, Edwards, CA (1997) Earthworm additions increased short-term nitrogen availability and leaching in two grain-crop agroecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 29:413–421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Beste, CE, Potts, WE (1991) Response of weeds to tillage and cover crop residue. Weed Sci 39:195–199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, AG (1985) Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Sci 33:34–43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traba, J, Azcárate, FM, Peco, B (2004) From what depth do seeds emerge? A soil seed bank experiment with Mediterranean grassland species. Seed Sci Res 14:297–303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travlos, IS, Cheimona, N, Roussis, I, Bilalis, DJ (2018) Weed-species abundance and diversity indices in relation to tillage systems and fertilization. Front Environ Sci 6:11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J, Van Noordwijk, M, Anderson, J, Ong, C, Perfecto, I (1998) Global change and multi-species agroecosystems: concepts and issues. Agric Ecosyst Environ 67:1–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waqar, A, Shah, GM, Bakhat, HF, Shahid, M, Aslam, M, Ashraf, MR, Hafeez, R, Murtaza, B, Rashid, MI (2019) The earthworm species Pheretima hawayana influences organic wastes decomposition, nitrogen mineralization and maize N recovery. Eur J Soil Biol 90:1–8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werth, J, Keenan, M, Thornby, D, Bell, K, Walker, S (2017) Emergence of four weed species in response to rainfall and temperature. Weed Biol Manag 17:29–35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, JH, Huijsmans, KGA (1994) Vertical seed dispersal by earthworms: a quantitative approach. Ecography (Cop) 17:124–130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, MS (2000) Agriculture: crop strength through diversity. Nature 406:681–682 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurst, S, Langel, R, Scheu, S (2005) Do endogeic earthworms change plant competition? A microcosm study. Plant Soil 271:123–130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, J, Hu, L, Tang, J, Wu, X, Li, N, Yuan, Y, Yang, H, Zhang, J, Luo, S, Chen, X (2011) Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:E1381–E1387 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarea, M, Ghalavand, A, Goltapeh, E, Rejali, F (2010) Effect of clovers intercropping and earthworm activity on weed growth. J Plant Prot Res 50: 463–469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, R, Li, C (2009) Effect of lead on survival, locomotion and sperm morphology of Asian earthworm, Pheretima guillelmi . J Environ Sci 21:691–695 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, X, Lv, W, Song, K, Li, S, Zhang, H, Bai, N, Zhang, J (2018) Effects of a vegetable-eel-earthworm integrated planting and breeding system on bacterial community structure in vegetable fields. Sci Rep 8:9520 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, XQ, Fan, XF, Zhang, HL, Shuang-Xi, LI, Wang, JQ, Zhang, JQ, Wang, LJ, Bin, Tao X, Wei-Guang, L (2015) Effects of Pheretima guillelmi cultivation time on microbial community diversity and characteristics of carbon metabolism in vegetable soil. J Agric Resour Environ 32:596–602 Google Scholar