Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:50:23.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of Achene Dormancy in Fumitory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry S. Jeffery  and
John D. Nalewaja
Larry S. Jeffery
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University, Fargo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fumitory (Fumaria officinalis L.) achenes were subjected to various treatments to induce germination and to study dormancy. Complete pericarp removal, partial seed coat removal, puncturing the seed coat, heat treatment, red and far-red light treatments, and germination temperature treatments did not break dormancy. Low-temperature after-ripening for 60 days at 4 C dormant fumitory achenes resulted in 90 to 95% germination. Water leaching of fumitory achenes increased the time required for successful after-ripening and the water leachate stimulated Avena coleoptile cylinder elongation. Wild oat (Avena fatua L.) embryo germination was inhibited by high concentrations of fumitory achene leachate and stimulated slightly by lower concentrations. High concentrations of the leachate inhibited epicotyl and radicle growth of pre-sprouted lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings and lower concentrations markedly stimulated radicle growth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , May 1970 , pp. 345 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amen, Ralph D. 1963. A concept of seed dormancy. Amer. Sci. 51:408–424.Google Scholar
2. Crocker, W. 1948. Growth of Plants. Reinhold Publ. Corp. New York, N. Y. 459 p.Google Scholar
3. Downs, R. J., Borthwick, H. A., and Piringer, A. A. 1961. Light and plants. U. S. Dep. Agr. Misc. Publ. 879. 26 p.Google Scholar
4. Justice, O. L. 1941. A study of dormancy of seeds of Polygonum . Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Memoir 325. 43 p.Google Scholar
5. Kothoff, I. M. and Rosenblum, C. 1937. Acid-base Indicators. Macmillan Co., New York. 414 p.Google Scholar
6. Kreitmar, H. 1949. Fumaria officinalis—der Erdrauch. Pharmazie 4(5):212.Google Scholar
7. Luckwell, L. C. 1952. Growth inhibiting and growth promoting substances in relation to dormancy and after-ripening of apple seed. J. Hort. Sci. (London) 27:53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Miller, C. O. 1956. Similarity of some kinetin and red light effects. Plant Physiol. 33:115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Naylor, J. M. and Simpson, G. M. 1961. Bioassay of gibberellic acid using excised embryos of Avena fatua L. Nature 192: 679–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar