Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:52:09.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stale seedbed weed control in cucumber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. Carroll Johnson III  and
Benjamin G. Mullinix Jr.
Benjamin G. Mullinix Jr.
Affiliation:
Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1995 to 1997 near Tifton, GA, to determine the benefits of stale seedbed weed control in cucumber. Three stale seedbed management systems—(1) power till stale seedbeds twice (2 ×), (2) glyphosate application immediately after planting, and (3) combination system of stale seedbeds power tilled once 2 wk prior to planting followed by glyphosate application immediately after planting cucumber—were evaluated as main plots. Subplots were weed management systems after planting cucumber: intensive, basic, and cultivation alone. Weed densities were generally greater in 1996 and 1997 than in 1995. Yellow nutsedge was the overall predominant species in 1995 (46 plants m−2), with Florida pusley being the predominant species in 1996 and 1997, at 80 and 124 plants m−2, respectively. Generally, stale seedbeds shallow tilled 2 × had fewer weeds and greater cucumber yields than stale seedbeds treated with glyphosate. Glyphosate did not adequately control emerged Florida pusley on stale seedbeds, resulting in reduced cucumber yield. Clomazone preemergence and bentazon/halosulfuron postemergence were used for broadleaf weed control in the intensive weed management system. These herbicides injured cucumber plants, delayed maturity, and reduced yield. Based on our results, stale seedbeds shallow tilled 2 × can be integrated into cucumber production and provide effective cultural weed control. Furthermore, these systems will replace the need for potentially injurious herbicides.

Keywords

BentazonclomazoneethalfluralinglyphosatehalosulfuronFlorida pusley, Richardia scabra L. RCHSCsmallflower morningglory, Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Griseb. IAQTAyellow nutsedgeCyperus esculentus L. CYPEScucumber, Cucumis sativus L.Cultural weed controlintegrated weed managementRCHSCIAQTACYPES
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 6 , December 1998 , pp. 698 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1991. Mechanical Weed Control: Keys to Getting Yields While Reducing or Eliminating the Use of Herbicides. Lewiston, MN: Land Stewardship Project. 8 p.Google Scholar
Bond, W. and Baker, P. J. 1990. Patterns of weed emergence following soil cultivation and its implications for weed control in vegetable crops. Pages 63–68 in British Crop Protection Council, Monogr. 45.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Carlson, D. R. 1980. Control of weeds in an oat (Avena sativa)—soybean (Glycine max) ecofarming rotation. Weed Sci. 28: 46–50.Google Scholar
Cardina, J. and Hook, J. E. 1989. Factors influencing germination and emergence of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) . Weed Technol. 3: 402–407.Google Scholar
Chancellor, R. J. 1985. Tillage effects of annual weed germination. World Soy. Res. Conf. III Proc. 3: 1105–1111.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1990. Decline of weed seeds and seedling emergence over five years as affected by soil disturbance. Weed Sci. 38: 504–510.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Eradat-Oskoui, K., and Wagner, S. W. 1993. Applications of weed seedbank ecology to low-input crop management. Ecol. Appl. 3: 74–83.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. and Lindstrom, M. J. 1988. Weed seed populations in ridge and conventional tillage. Weed Sci. 36: 500–503.Google Scholar
Friesen, G. J. 1979. Weed interference in transplanted tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) . Weed Sci. 27: 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunsolus, J. L. 1990. Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 5: 114–119.Google Scholar
Heatherly, L. G. and Elmore, C. D. 1983. Response of soybeans (Glycine max) to planting in untilled, weedy seedbed on clay soil. Weed Sci. 31: 93–99.Google Scholar
Heatherly, L. G., Elmore, C. D., and Wesley, R. A. 1990. Weed control and soybean response to preplant tillage and planting time. Soil Till. Res. 17, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 1995. Weed management in peanut using stale seedbed techniques. Weed Sci. 43: 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 1997. Economic considerations of stale seedbed weed control in peanut. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 184.Google Scholar
Noll, C. J. 1975. Herbicide weeding of cucumber grown in a stale seedbed. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 29: 262–263.Google Scholar
Noll, C. J. 1978. Chemical weeding of cucumber grown in a stale seedbed. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 32: 230–232.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. A. 1972. Fate of seeds of some annual weeds in different depths of cultivated and undisturbed soil. Weed Res. 12: 316–324.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. G. 1978. Control by tillage and persistence of volunteer sunflower and annual weeds. Agron. J. 70: 1053–1056.Google Scholar
Smith, E. V. and Mayton, E. L. 1938. Nut grass eradication studies. II. The eradication of nut grass, Cyperus rotundus L., by certain tillage treatments. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 30: 18–21.Google Scholar
Tripp, T. N., Oliver, L. R., and Baldwin, F. L. 1988. Use of imazaquin and chlorimuron plus metribuzin in stale seedbed soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41: 38.Google Scholar
Warnes, D. D. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Decline of wild mustard (Brassica kaber) seeds in soil under various cultural and chemical practices. Weed Sci. 32: 214–217.Google Scholar