Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:55:18.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean (Glycine Max) Cultivar Tolerance to San 582H and Metolachlor As Influenced by Soil Moisture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bradley T. Osborne ,
David R. Shaw  and
Randall L. Ratliff
Bradley T. Osborne
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant & Soil Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant & Soil Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Randall L. Ratliff
Affiliation:
Sandoz Agro, Inc., Greenville, MS 38701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1991 and 1992 to evaluate differential soybean cultivar tolerance to SAN 582H and metolachlor applied PRE, as influenced by soil moisture. Eighteen d after planting, a 3× rate of SAN 582H (3.0 kg ai ha−1) reduced plant populations of ‘Wright,’ ‘Bedford,’ and ‘Stonewall’ and metolachlor did not. At leaf drop, neither herbicide reduced crop height with optimum moisture. With excessive moisture, 3× rates of SAN 582H reduced plant height of Wright, Bedford, ‘Walters,’ ‘Young,’ ‘Brim,’ and ‘Bryan,’ and metolachlor reduced height of ‘Sharkey.’ The greatest yield reductions were due to excessive moisture, regardless of herbicide. Neither herbicide reduced yields with optimum moisture nor did a 1× rate with excessive moisture. However, with excessive moisture, a 3× rate of metolachlor (5.0 kg ai ha−1) reduced yield of Bedford by 470 kg ha−1, and the 3× rate of SAN 582H reduced yield of ‘Rhodes,’ Walters, and ‘Centennial’ more than 500 kg ha−1. Overall, soybean tolerance to both herbicides was good, but if used above recommended rates and with excessive moisture, injury can occur.

Keywords

SAN 582H, (1RS, aRS)-2-chloro-N-(2,4-dimethyl-3-thienyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)-acetamidemetolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidesoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Tolerancecultivar
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 288 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Anonymous. 1992. SAN 582H experimental herbicide: A technical overview. Sandoz Agro, Inc., Des Plaines, IL 60018.Google Scholar
2. Bellinder, R. R. and Warholic, D. T. 1988. Evaluation of acetanilide injury and its potential for yield reduction in cabbage, Brassica oleracea L. Weed Technol. 2:350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Boldt, L. D. and Barrett, M. 1989. Factors in alachlor and metolachlor injury to corn (Zea mays) seedlings. Weed Technol. 3:303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D. and Werling, V. L. 1989. Weed control from imazaquin and metolachlor in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Coats, G. E. 1992. Evaluation of experimental herbicides for warm season turfgrasses—1991. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:130.Google Scholar
6. Deal, L. M. and Hess, F. D. 1980. An analysis of the growth inhibitory characteristics of alachlor and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 28:168–175.Google Scholar
7. Griffin, J. L. and Harger, T. R. 1986. Red rice (Oryza sativa) and junglerice (Echinochloa colonum) control in solid-seeded soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 34:582–586.Google Scholar
8. Jones, R. E. Jr., Banks, P. A., and Radcliffe, D. E. 1990. Alachlor and metribuzin movement and dissipation in a soil profile as influenced by soil surface condition. Weed Sci. 38:589–597.Google Scholar
9. Jordan, G. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1978. Response of processing peas (Pisum sativum) and annual weeds to acetanilide herbicides. Weed Sci. 26:313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ketchersid, M. L., Norton, K., and Merkle, M. G. 1981. Influence of soil moisture on the safening effect of CGA-43089 in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 29:281–287.Google Scholar
11. Khodayari, K., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Black, H. L. 1987. Red rice (Oryza sativa) control with herbicide treatments in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 35:127–129.Google Scholar
12. Newsom, L. J. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) response to chlorimuron and imazaquin as influenced by soil moisture. Weed Technol. 6:389–395.Google Scholar
13. Regehr, D. L. and Janssen, K. A. 1989. Preplant weed control in a ridge-till soybean (Glycine max) and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) rotation. Weed Technol. 3:621–626.Google Scholar
14. Rowe, L., Rossman, E., and Penner, D. 1990. Differential response of corn hybrids and inbreds to metolachlor. Weed Sci. 38:563–566.Google Scholar
15. Scott, H. D., DeAngulo, J., Daniels, M. B., and Wood, L. S. 1989. Flood duration effects on soybean growth and yield. Agron. J. 81:631–636.Google Scholar
16. Tripp, T. N. and Baldwin, F. L. 1988. Effect of excessive precipitation on soybean injury from imazaquin and chlorimuron. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28:39.Google Scholar
17. Weber, J. B. and Peter, C. J. 1982. Adsorption, bioactivity, and evaluation of soil tests for alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 30:14–20.Google Scholar
18. Wehtje, G., Dickens, R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hajek, B. F. 1987. Sorption and mobility of sulfometuron and imazapyr in five Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 35:858–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar