Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:23:19.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sorption–desorption of cyanazine in three Mississippi delta soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen M. Schraer ,
David R. Shaw ,
Michelle Boyette ,
William L. Kingery  and
Cliff H. Koger
Stephen M. Schraer
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Box 9555, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Michelle Boyette
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Box 9555, Mississippi State, MS 39762
William L. Kingery
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Box 9555, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Cliff H. Koger
Affiliation:
Southern Weed Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sorption and desorption of cyanazine with three Mississippi Delta soils (two silt loams and one silty clay) were studied under laboratory conditions. Cyanazine sorption calculated using the Freundlich equation was greatest for the Sharkey silty clay soil. Partition coefficients (K d values) for cyanazine sorption ranged from 1.67 to 1.82, 1.92 to 2.15, and 3.65 to 3.96 ml g−1 for the Bosket silt loam, Dubbs silt loam, and Sharkey silty clay soils, respectively. Differences in sorption and K d values were attributed to clay content. At a given initial cyanazine concentration, cyanazine was desorbed more readily from the silt loam soils than from the Sharkey clay after the first 4-h desorption cycle. Desorption from the Sharkey clay continued for a longer period than that from the silt loam soils, with up to 6% cyanazine desorption from the Sharkey clay after a 16-h desorption cycle compared with 0% for the silt loam soils. Cyanazine losses increased with decreasing clay content, Dubbs = Bosket > Sharkey. This implies a potential relationship between cyanazine desorption and surface runoff losses of cyanazine.

Keywords

CyanazinePesticidescation exchange capacityhigh-performance liquid chromatographysorption isotherm
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 635 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bailey, G. W., White, J. L., and Rothberg, T. 1968. Sorption of organic herbicides by montmorillonite: role of pH and chemical character of adsorbate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32:222–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, D. C. and Lavy, T. L. 1985. Hexazinone sorption-desorption studies with soil and organic adsorbents. J. Environ. Qual. 14:181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancela, D. G., Taboada, E. R., and Sanchez-Rasero, F. 1990. Sorption of cyanazine on peat and montmorillonite clay surfaces. Soil Sci. 150:836–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carringer, R. D., Weber, J. B., and Monoco, T. J. 1975. Sorption-desorption of selected pesticides by organic matter and montmorillonite. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:568–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, J. C., Jokela, W. E., Potter, F. I., and Williams, J. W. 1996. Paired watershed comparison of tillage effects on runoff, sediment, and pesticide losses. J. Environ. Qual. 25:1000–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, S. A., Allmaras, R. R., Koskinen, W. C., and Wyse, D. L. 1988. Desorption of atrazine and cyanazine from soil. J. Environ. Qual. 17:719–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupe, R. H., Thurman, E. M., and Zimmerman, L. R. 1998. Relation of usage to the occurrence of cotton and rice herbicides in three streams of the Mississippi Delta. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:3673–3680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, B. T. 1986. Hydrolysis of cyanazine in aqueous solutions of weak acids. Pestic. Sci. 17:363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hance, R. J. 1969. The sorption of linuron, atrazine, and EPTC by model aliphatic adsorbents and soil organic preparations. Weed Res. 9:108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, N. C., Gupta, S. C., and Moncrief, J. F. 2000. Herbicide banding and tillage effects on runoff, sediment, and phosphorus losses. J. Environ. Qual. 29:1555–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M.H.B. 1970. Sorption of triazine herbicides on soil organic matter, including a short review on soil organic chemistry. Residue Rev. 31:131–174.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C. and Harper, S. S. 1990. The retention process: mechanisms. Pages 51–77 In Cheng, H. H., ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment. SSSA Book Series 2. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. A. 1990. Movement of pesticides into surface waters. Pages 303–350 In Cheng, H. H., ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment. SSSA Book Series 2. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Ma, L., Southwick, L. M., Willis, G. H., and Selim, H. M. 1993. Hysteretic characteristics of atrazine sorption-desorption by a Sharkey soil. Weed Sci. 41:627–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majka, J. T. and Lavy, T. L. 1977. Sorption, mobility, and degradation of cyanazine and diuron in soils. Weed Sci. 25:401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, J. M., Moorman, T. B., and Cambardella, C. A. 1997. Atrazine sorption at the field scale in relation to soils and landscape. J. Environ. Qual. 26:1271–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, W. E. and Hostettler, F. D. 1993. Nonpoint source contamination of the Mississippi River and its tributaries by herbicides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27:1542–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, W. E. and Rostad, C. E. 1990. Occurrence, distributions, and transport of herbicides and their degradation products in the lower Mississippi River and its tributaries. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24:1400–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 1997. Soil type and tillage effects on sorption of cyanazine and degradation products. Weed Sci. 45:727–732.Google Scholar
Senesi, N. and Testini, C. 1980. Sorption of some nitrogenated herbicides by soil humic acids. Soil Sci. 130:314–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senseman, S. A., Lavy, T. L., Mattice, J. D., Gbur, E. E., and Skulman, B. W. 1997. Trace level pesticide detections in Arkansas surface waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31:395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. E. and Walker, A. 1989. Prediction of the persistence of the triazine herbicides atrazine, cyanazine, and metribuzin in Regina heavy clay. Can. J. Soil Sci. 69:587–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonanda. 2002. Sonanda Zhengzhou Pesticide Co., Ltd. Available at http:www.sonanda.com. Accessed: August 12, 2002.Google Scholar
Southwick, L. M., Willis, G. H., Mercado, O. A., and Bengtson, R. L. 1997. Effect of subsurface drains on runoff losses of metolachlor and trifluralin from Mississippi River alluvial soils. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 32:106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurman, E. M., Goolsby, D. A., Meyer, M. T., Mills, M. S., Pomes, M. L., and Kolpin, D. W. 1992. A reconnaissance study of herbicides and their metabolites in surface water of the midwestern United States using immunoassay and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:2440–2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA SCS] U. S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Soil Survey—Washington County, Mississippi. Series 1958, No. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Verstraeten, I. M., Carr, J. D., Steele, G. V., Thurman, E. M., Bastian, K. C., and Dormendy, D. F. 1999. Surface water-ground water interaction: herbicide transport into municipal collector wells. J. Environ. Qual. 28:1396–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J. B. 1970. Sorption of s-triazines by montmorillonite as a function of pH and molecular structure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34:401–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar